Jump to content

Thinking About Style - Things I'm Working On


Recommended Posts

I've written before about the troubles I've had with a kind of Style (the post takes a while to load, lots of GIFs), and being forced into a style that wasn't "me", or at least that I had a really hard time bringing forward. I just wasn't an evasive, tricky, or dodge-y person. It wasn't until I discovered that there was a different style, a forward, space-eating style that I was set more free. I remember the beginning of realizing this was something that Andy Thomson said: "There is not one Muay Thai, there are 1,000s. Each person has their own Muay Thai."

The yesterday I wrote about the Things I'm Working On and a lot of them have to do with my style, and how to best bring it out. These things involve body punches, overhands, clinching hips in, taking space, not rushing. 

I wanted to post here because a lot of us feel like we want to measure up to "a" Muay Thai. We want to do it "right". There definitely are right and wrong ways to do things, but there is not the one way to do a particular thing. 

You don't need to be a fighter to think about style. What is your style, and what are you doing to pursue it?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your old post about finding your style is still one of my favorite blog posts.  I have found myself telling my students to find their own style of Muay Thai.  It also helps remind me that my job as their coach is to help them find their own style, not necessarily to mold them into MY style.  Sure, I teach my style of Muay Thai, but with my eyes towards helping them find their own way to express themselves.

I find myself nodding along wholeheartedly with your comments regarding scoring faster in the clinch.  One of the things that I try very hard to impress upon my students/fighters is that you don't use the clinch to setup your strikes (knees, then elbows)... rather, you use your knees (and elbows) to setup your clinch.  I want my students to immediately begin attacking with knees the moment they reach forward and touch their opponent.  Basically, we focus on reaching to control your opponents arms (biceps), attack with knees, transition to clinching with more knees and/or elbows.

In regards to the hook while rotating your core first, then punching....  that is ONE way of doing it.  I favor the practice of everything moving together as one solid unit.  That's not to say that is the only method I employ or teach, but its the method I focus on.  It's my "core" method, so to speak...  I use the method of moving my core first, then punching when I throw the hook that some people refer to as the "Russian Hook" or "Casting Punch".  (same same)

Wall of China?  LOL!  You and I have discussed this before.  The 2nd method you mention of pushing the leg down is my preferred counter...  but are you pushing down with your hand or using your own knee to push your opponent's down?  Your blog post is unclear on that point...

I feel you on "snapping the jab"...  I've recently begun helping a fighter learn to snap his jab.  It's something that I've learned to do on my own, and finding a way to describe to him what I want has been a challenge in that I'm sure what I'm telling him and showing him makes sense, but its just not "clicked" with him yet.  But reading your post reminds me of an analogy one of my boxing coaches used to explain it....  snapping a towel at someone!  (I'm going to use that analogy with him the next time we train and see if it helps!)

I love the term "scratch" to describe the scenario, especially late in a fight.  It's an attitude, really, and I feel that it leads directly into your comments on persuasion & authority....  It's like there's a level of scrappiness/aggressiveness you must demonstrate & maintain throughout an entire fight, but you must do so intelligently.  You can't just charge in, it's not the same thing!  But then, I'm preaching to the choir on that subject!  ;)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't yet know my Own style. But I don't move quick.. I feel almost like I'm lumbering along through the moves. I'm not a Stalker (not yet anyways). Rather,during practice I tend to ... Sit and wait for lack of a better term. I'm still unfamiliar with myself and what I can do, but I know enough that I sit and wait. Which I don't think is necessarily a good thing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In regards to the hook while rotating your core first, then punching....  that is ONE way of doing it.  I favor the practice of everything moving together as one solid unit.  That's not to say that is the only method I employ or teach, but its the method I focus on.  It's my "core" method, so to speak...  I use the method of moving my core first, then punching when I throw the hook that some people refer to as the "Russian Hook" or "Casting Punch".  (same same)

Yeah, like Master K's robot arm, where you just swing the whole body around and the fist torpedos! He'd lightly nudge me with his knuckles when he demonstrated and even that made me want to cry... so powerful.

The push-down on the Wall of China is with the hand, very fast, hips in first to create pressure, then relaxed at that moment - followed by an immediate knee. It is very effective. There are other counters but I'm trying to minimize my options so that I don't get caught thinking so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't yet know my Own style. But I don't move quick.. I feel almost like I'm lumbering along through the moves. I'm not a Stalker (not yet anyways). Rather,during practice I tend to ... Sit and wait for lack of a better term. I'm still unfamiliar with myself and what I can do, but I know enough that I sit and wait. Which I don't think is necessarily a good thing.

Sounds like you're on your way to being a counter striker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is exactly why I love your blog, Sylvie! I never knew there were different styles of fighting, of course, I intuitively felt there might be different styles, but it's different when you see it written down and described :)

I'm still a little bit like Michelle, I still don't know what my body is capable of, sometimes I'm surprised by it, sometimes I'm dissapointed. What I've heard from people, they say I have kind of my own style: I constantly go forward, don't show off spectacular moves, just keep pressuring the opponent. But I also let go, just like in training and "reset" the fight ;)

It's funny, because this is what other say, watching from the sidelines. What I feel in the ring is completely different. I try not to get punched, I try to attack first, and I'm trying out my best moves, maybe not wanting to show off, but wanting the opponent to take me seriously. Basically, when I see someone is taking me lightly (this happens a lot, I usually spar with young adult guys) I throw a backfist or a ushiro mawashi geri (spin back kick?). Even if the hit doesn't land (which it usually does with someone taking me lightly) it make the opponent shift gears. So I kind of think about it as showing off.

I think I'm definitely more of the "aesthetic" fighter, femur whas it? I like when the technique looks good and is effective as well, but I'd rather hit with good technique than strong. At least that is my opinion at this point in time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, like Master K's robot arm, where you just swing the whole body around and the fist torpedos! He'd lightly nudge me with his knuckles when he demonstrated and even that made me want to cry... so powerful.

 

OMG!  This is why I miss Master K so much!  He had the most hilarious (but effective!) analogies for EVERYTHING!  I still train with a number of his former students, and we have tried to compile a list of "K-isms" for posterity.  We all crack up when we review the list we've compiled....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The push-down on the Wall of China is with the hand, very fast, hips in first to create pressure, then relaxed at that moment - followed by an immediate knee. It is very effective. There are other counters but I'm trying to minimize my options so that I don't get caught thinking so much.

 

 

Again, you and I seem to share brain cells sometimes!  LOL!  While my preferred method to break the Wall of China is using my knees to push it down and "walk over", I'm TOTALLY with you on keeping things simple and choosing 1 method that works for me (or teaching my students to choose 1 method that really works for THEM!).  I do this throughout training.... teach a variety of methods to achieve the same goal, then let my students practice to discover the 1 that suits them best.

It's like that clinch knee combo that Kaensak taught you.  2 quick knees, step with the opposite foot and pivot in place, then slam a knee into their exposed ribs while they're off balance....  (one of your many video blogs, not sure if you remember the specific one).  Or the escape/counter to the body clinch that Kaensak taught me....  These are great techniques to know and I teach them to my students.  However, when it comes time to begin fight training, many techniques such as those mentioned get dropped from the aresenal in favor of simpler, more direct techniques that are easier to execute in a high-stress situation such as an actual fight.

...which goes back to what you've mentioned about the importance of "play" in Muay Thai.  Those more intricate moves not only work but are effective, but only after lots of practice.  "Play" in Muay Thai is absolutely essential for these techniques to be mastered, but its a concept that the American mindset/style of training still greatly struggles with.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just out of curiosity, what are some archetypal styles that you guys have seen in fighters?

Outside of MT in striking sports I've heard of terms like "out-fighter" that I'm not entirely familiar with along with the more obvious "boxer" and etc.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tbh, I'm still figuring it out. I find out I love to use the knees and clinch method during sparring (if allowed) or training. It's where my strength lies. But during a fight, things just don't turn out exactly like you wanted as always.. hahahahha.. I have noticed I usually get bashed up by opponent in first round and then change my gear during second round.. I like to circle around the ring, wearing my opponent down and when they come in - I will throw a punch and a kick move to the side / teep them until they can't follow my pace. It will end up with lots of knees from there onwards or elbows if allowed.. << This usually happened when most of my opponent are punchers instead of both.. I dislike punchers =.=, no offense made there..

 

But sometimes it gets really frustrating because I want to do clinch not punch and kick only.. But, oh well I can't hope it goes out like what I planned before the fight.. XD

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just out of curiosity, what are some archetypal styles that you guys have seen in fighters?

Outside of MT in striking sports I've heard of terms like "out-fighter" that I'm not entirely familiar with along with the more obvious "boxer" and etc.

In western boxing they have the "boxer" vs. the "puncher," which is supposed to be the difference between someone who is very technical and cereberal and someone who hits to hurt, but not quite a "brawler"

In Muay Thai I've seen "inside fighters"; "knee fighters"; "counter strikers"; "boxers" (Pornsenae and Pakorn); "defensive" (Sam A); Saenchai is often called "feemeur" but I don't fully agree because he stays in the pocket even though he's evasive; "counter fighter"; "tricky fighter" (that's Saenchai to me); "cocky" is what I'd call Kaensak's style, in a good way; "book" is like a forward pressure fighter, like Thanonchai (my favorite); I'd call Sangmanee "feemeur"...

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In western boxing they have the "boxer" vs. the "puncher," which is supposed to be the difference between someone who is very technical and cereberal and someone who hits to hurt, but not quite a "brawler"

In Muay Thai I've seen "inside fighters"; "knee fighters"; "counter strikers"; "boxers" (Pornsenae and Pakorn); "defensive" (Sam A); Saenchai is often called "feemeur" but I don't fully agree because he stays in the pocket even though he's evasive; "counter fighter"; "tricky fighter" (that's Saenchai to me); "cocky" is what I'd call Kaensak's style, in a good way; "book" is like a forward pressure fighter, like Thanonchai (my favorite); I'd call Sangmanee "feemeur"...

 Thanks for the insight Sylvie, I heard about the "femur" Muay Thai fighters vs. the more aggressive fighters from your blog post, but I had no idea there were so many different aspects!! I think I'm going to go take a look at each of the fighters you've mentioned here to see if I can sort of scope out what each style means in practice...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Erm, I don't know if this is a style question or not, but are there fighters who utilize both traditional and southpaw stances equally? I'd like to get acquainted with them and their style and how they train.

 

Yes, there are definitely "switch" fighters....  I'm trying to think of any notable ones, but for some reason I'm drawing a blank right now.  I'll poke around to see if I can find something....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay cool. Because right now I'm having a self identified identity crisis when it comes to stance. I have more power in orthodox and better technique in southpaw. I am not completely comfortable in either. It's been over a year now and it still feels that way.

 

I know part of the reason is because of my shoulder, any time we run nothing but jabs or jabs and hooks off the lead arm I have to switch to southpaw because my shoulder can't handle it yet. But yeah. I tried googling but couldn't find anything but articles on the disadvantages of being southpaw.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Since it's right near two years later, wondered if anyone has noticed a change in their style and how they approach opponents/partners? Has time made you stronger or more confident in a certain style or has it changed for you? Just curious.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have less than 10 fights so I still haven't found my style. When I started fighting about a year ago I just kicked a lot, but in my last few fights I have felt stronger in the clinch and found knees to be more effective. In my next handful of fights I would really like to develop my confidence in the ring so that I can display a stronger style as opposed to my current position of different styles for every fight..which I know is probably normal for an amateur but feels messy to me.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since it's right near two years later, wondered if anyone has noticed a change in their style and how they approach opponents/partners? Has time made you stronger or more confident in a certain style or has it changed for you? Just curious.

 

The two year mark is really interesting for Sylvie. About two years ago, if not a little more, Sylvie went into a very deep clinch game, Muay Khao style. This meant striking a lot less, fortifying herself against attacks when closing distance, and snuffing strikes, developing ways of entering clinch. But in the last few months she's started to really concentrate on relaxation which has opened up other modes of fighting for her, modes that are only starting to show themselves. This really came to a head a week ago when Karuhat, a legendary fighter who has cornered for her a few times, and who we film with, out of nowhere decided to turn Sylvie completely southpaw, because this would eliminate some fundamental technique flaws she's shown against some problematic opponents. This southpaw switch somehow really connected up with what she's been quietly working on, Nongki energy, more Karuhat like suddenness, and is creating a whole different series of style movements. I'm not sure what is going to come of this, but it is as if Sylvie's fortress style was a long and necessary phase she had to pass through before she could get to more relaxation, and a different part of her character. And only really the excellence of her opponents (certain elite fighters who can stay with Sylvie in clinch), and the increasing size of her opponents, which has pushed her to go beyond her very defined "style". It's pretty exciting times.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • from the same commodity article I've been citing, here a very important transition from exclusivity to authenticity, as the distance between (knowledge) production and (knowledge) consumption shrinks, and duplication or imitation increases. This genuinely is where we are with the invasion of the "combo" from the West, really a technique "duplication" mechanism, attempting to copy and reproduce for export the more nuanced knowledge of traditional Muay Thai production. Notable is that, as rule changes have come to emphasize the de-skilled combo (clash fighting, KO bonuses, aggression and volume valorization, down-regulating defense and control), the counterfeit becomes woven into production itself...and, one suspects that "authenticity" will rise as a value marker, due to this collapse.   
    • I've been thinking about how to write about this. A few sketched out ideas. Sylvie's chosen path to fight a LOT - and as it turns out more than anyone documented along several criteria, but it wasn't really the ambition - was because when we came to Thailand we were pretty surprised by a few things. The first was that really there wasn't a huge gap between very experienced local circuit Thai female fighters, and nominal "World Champions". It was more a small question of degree, which meant that if you were a high practicing circuit fighter you already were not that far off from "World Champion" level. At the time - and maybe this has changed some, in part due to Sylvie's example, now fighters count and even probably exaggerate their fight totals - the goal was for foreigners to come to Thailand and win belts. As there was no substantive difference between belt and no-belt, and as Sylvie's actually goal was to just get increasingly proficient in Muay Thai, to come closer to it in its cultural form, pursuing belts really wasn't very interesting, especially because being booked for a belt fight at the time was largely in the hands of a few powerful gyms that were promoting their name to Westerners. She didn't really want to fight in the high profile Tourism layer of Muay Thai, the layer that was big gym steered. Instead it seemed that the best way forward was to just fight. And fight a ton. The Thai gambling social form of Muay Thai, and other cultural constraints, made it so that Sylvie would never really be given an easy match, once she became known, and as she increased the size of her opponents - a luxury she had because she was only a 100 lb fighter, and she could practically go up and up and up as long as her skill kept pace - there was a huge talent pool of Thai female fighters in the traditional Muay Thai scenes.  She began detaching herself from gym control (extremely hard to do), in part because gyms have social obligations to specific promoters, and in part because gyms also have incentive to force matchups that (at times) unduly favor their Western fighter, and booking her fights in various regions of Thailand, moving from provincial fighting, to local tourist oriented scenes, to Bangkok big broadcast shows, from the North to the Northeast to the South. It really was profound, and uniquely freed fighting because all that mattered was that the fight was fair and challenging, the exact recipe for unique growth (a sign of this babybear match-making is that she really held a 70% or so win rate as her opponents went up in weight. It really was an ideal Milo's Calf condition), building-in increasing handicaps, one that I don't believe can ever be duplicated because of how much Thailand's Muay Thai has been infiltrated by the Soft Power economic imperative, digital image-making, and how female fighters themselves have come to be reinscribed in the Thai power dynamics of Entertainment Fighting. Promotions and gyms now value and control Western (and Thai) female fighters in much more restrictive ways that produce a limitation of opportunity and experience. Restrictions indeed existed before, but today female fighters have been woven into other more hierarchical interests that are unlikely to recede. It really was that she didn't want to be fighting for belts that were politically arranged (even if great opportunities), or to have people controlling her matchups to produce regular advantages so to secure an image of dominance. Images of dominance in Thailand's Muay Thai actually often close down opportunities, and it was our feeling that as traditional Muay Thai itself is undergoing widespread deskilling, the one sure fire way to continue to grow was to fight, climbing an increasingly steep grade. The fight, if the thumb is not unnaturally on the scale in your favor, is the one (fairly) unblemished experience that grew knowledge and capacity in the sport. Thais fought a lot in their development, Sylvie would just take this principle and maximize it as an adult who came to the sport later in life, detouring the various prestige honey-pots and power imbalances that could trap you, cut you off from what was possible in you. Key was working at Thailand's talent-rich margins, and creating a vast network of promoter and gym relationships so that you never became too advantaged in the ring...advantage that came as bias to all Westerners who have been part of Thailand's embrace. Sylvie was setting a path on the edges of the sport, a sport which had a quite vast provincial base, much of which Westerners did not really encounter.  The result of all this, of literally 100s of fights of increasing size difficulty, in the traditional - nuanced - mode of the sport is an extremely grounded - she hasn't been knocked down in over 1,000 rounds - defensively robust (a gep awut 4th round imperative) fighting style, that is very, very attuned to narrative scoring (it has to be, because that's how trad scoring works), all built around Muay Khao and clinch dominance in a very small, 100 lb body, quite in contrast with the more common body types and size around which Muay Khao usually is ascribed. An absolutely unique fighting capacity, that was made out of its fight path...along with the continuous influence of really unparalleled documentary work, which also has been no small part of the story. But it really came from shunning advantage, and false pictures of mastery. It came from just doing. And it came from a certain kind of invisibleness, the ability to slide across power barriers that can capture many others, at a different time in Thailand's Muay Thai history, a time of a perfect relationship between connectivity and tradition, in a sweet spot that no longer exists, before Muay Thai was given over to the foreigner in more programmatic, economic, sport-changing ways.   
    • Fighting is just such an incredibly compressive experience. Even one fight, or five. As Sylvie's husband it just boggles my mind that she has fought nearly 300 documented fights, even at the human level, stepping into the ring that many times, in a sport and culture she was not raised in, was not acclimated to in her youth, but rather came to love and grow into, earning her physical and emotional compassry, day by day, year by year. Just the sheer numbers of that compression spins my mind. Over and over and over. Stepping into conflict fire to learn the art of shaping under duress.  This week Sylvie had one of her more typical matchups. Refusing to fight in tourism's Entertainment Muay Thai, especially since COVID, she's positioned herself at the margins of where the Internet light usually shines, in provincial festival fights and in local city scenes where traditional Muay Thai is still trained for and fought. And giving up substantive weight so matchups that test her, grow her, can be had. This time it was in Hua Hin vs Linping who is a 53-54 kg fighter who often faces significantly bigger Westerners. She's tested herself. But Sylvie is giving up 6-7 kgs going in. Not all that unusual for her, in fact about half her fights have been 3 or more weight classes up.    What I'm writing about here is something much more simple, something more elemental. Sylvie - by far - has fought up more than any female fighter in documented history, likely by a very, very large margin. Speaking of the compressiveness of fighting there is something that is even more intensely compressive when fighting someone larger than you, and even distinctly quite bigger. The body itself seems to experience the danger, the risk, at a very base level. You stand there, they stand there, the size can just be felt. She's very experienced in this, and has developed any number of tools, both technical and psychological, to mitigate that, but just as a witness, there is some level at which nothing can be done. It just is going to compress you. And that she has done this for such an enormous number of fights is kind of insane and unknowable. She looks at large opponents and her mind now sizes them down. They don't seem that big, but at a real and substantive level the emotional body knows. And I stand in awe at this mountain she is climbing. She has made an art of the duress.    
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.4k
    • Total Posts
      11.6k
×
×
  • Create New...