Jump to content

Sitmonchai Gym VS Kem Muay Thai Gym VS ?


Recommended Posts

I know I've asked before about gym, but my situation has changed and I will be going to Thailand for a month next summer alone. 

After reading Sylvie's list my two choices would probably be Sitmonchai Gym or Kem Muay Thai Gym.

I have two main considerations:

My size, 6'4" 240 lbs, I need a gym with foreigners even here in Canada I have difficulty finding sparring partners of my size so I can't imagine in Thailand. 

and Clinch. I want to learn a lot of clinch because in north america we don't, I least in the 3 gyms I've trained we did not do much. 

Because of the first criteria I am leaning towards Simonchai but Sylvie said they do not clinch much so I am hesitating. 

And Kem's gym seems awesome, they clinch a lot but I am afraid of lacking people with my size. 

Any advices or suggestions? I don't really care where it is or how much. It's just for a month and all I want to do is train. 

thank you

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I forget his name, but there is one pretty big trainer out at Sitmonchai. From my understanding, even the big Thai's at Kem's are only 70kgs. I'd shoot Sitmonchai a message with your questions/concerns and just see what they say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I've asked before about gym, but my situation has changed and I will be going to Thailand for a month next summer alone. 

After reading Sylvie's list my two choices would probably be Sitmonchai Gym or Kem Muay Thai Gym.

I have two main considerations:

My size, 6'4" 240 lbs, I need a gym with foreigners even here in Canada I have difficulty finding sparring partners of my size so I can't imagine in Thailand. 

and Clinch. I want to learn a lot of clinch because in north america we don't, I least in the 3 gyms I've trained we did not do much. 

Because of the first criteria I am leaning towards Simonchai but Sylvie said they do not clinch much so I am hesitating. 

And Kem's gym seems awesome, they clinch a lot but I am afraid of lacking people with my size. 

Any advices or suggestions? I don't really care where it is or how much. It's just for a month and all I want to do is train. 

thank you

 

No doubt, you are a big guy! But, it is probably better to learn how to clinch against smaller Thais that really know what they are doing in the clinch, with long clinch sessions, and it is to go against big westerners who don't really have the expertise, less frequently. You really want to be exposed to technique. Of course this operates on a scale, and it's hard to assess from afar.

Kru San (re: Tyler's comment) who is a pretty big guy at Sitmonchai, but I don't know if he clinches. I'll tell you though he's impressive with his strikes. You can watch a private session with Kru San on Sylvie's Patreon. He's kind of incredible. He's recently begun fighting again, after several years of retirement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both are great gyms with very different styles and strengths. 

Kem is more isolated, only in the sense that the "next town over" is pretty far over. Sitmonchai is also isolated in an immediate sense, but you can get to Kanchanburi pretty easily on a Sunday or whatever. That's only important in considering what it might feel like if you're not having ideal training - being able to venture out or if you might feel stuck. 

The kind of focus Kem has in watching his students is truly amazing and the trainers are very cool. The setting is stunning and, for some, that kind of isolation feels really good. I've had his trainers in my corner at fights and have watched them training others, as well as kicked pads with one or two, and I feel like they're just a wonderful set of men. 

I'm not actually helping you, but these are a few more balls to add into your decision making juggle, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone. 

Sound advices. Since I saw the video of Rambaa Somdet whipping the dude's ass I kind of want to go try a week with him now.... ahahah although he look like a real small man. But the quality of the technique over the size of the teacher sounds good

But I think the advice of isolation is a good one. I think I might try Rambaa for a week and then heads up to Sitmonchai. Jeez, so many gym to choose from. Hard to make a choice. Especially from far away. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • Speculatively, it seems likely that the real "warfare roots" of ring Muay Thai goes back to all the downtime during siege encampment, (and peacetime) Ayutthaya's across the river outer quarters. One of the earliest historical accounts of Siamese ring fighting is of the "Tiger King" disguising himself and participating in plebeian ring fighting. This is not "warfare fighting" and goes back several hundred years. One can imagine that such fighting would share some fighting principles with what occurred on the battlefield, but as it was unarmed and likely a gambling driven sport it - at least to me - likely seems like it has had its very own lineage of development. Less was the case that people were bringing battlefield lessons into the ring, and more that gambled on fighting skills developed ring-to-ring. In such cases of course, developing balance and defensive prowess would be important.  Incidentally, any such Ayutthaya ring-to-ring developments hold the historical potential for lots of cross-pollination from other fighting arts, as Ayutthaya maintained huge mercenary forces, not only from Malaysia and the cusp of islands, but even an entire Japanese quarter, not to mention a strong commercially minded Chinese presence. These may have been years of truly "mixing" fighting arts in the gambling rings of the city (it is unknown just how separatist each culture was in this melting pot, perhaps each kept to their own in ring fighting).
    • For anyone who follows my writings I do not argue for any sense of a "pure" Muay Thai, or even Siamese fighting art history. Quite different than such I take one of Siam and Thai strengths is just how integrative they have been over centuries of development (while, importantly, preserving its core identity). For instance Western Boxing has had a powerful influence upon the form and development of Muay Thai for well over 100 years, and helped make it perhaps the premiere ring fighting art in the world, but Western Boxing itself was a very deep, complexly developed art which mapped quite well upon traditional Muay Thai in many areas, allowing it to flourish. This is quite different than the de-skilling that is happening in the sport right now, where instead the sport is being turned towards a less-skilled development, for really commercial reasons.  The story of whether the influx of attention, branding, not to mention the very important monetary investment that Entertainment Muay Thai has brought will actually help "save" traditional Muay Thai is yet to be written. It very well might, as the sport was reaching some important demographic and cultural dead-ends, and it needed an infusion. But, let's not have it be lost, what itself is being lost, which is the actual very high level of skill Thailand had produced...and how it had developed it. Let's keep our eye on the de-skilling.
    • One of the more slippery aspects of this change is that in its more extreme versions Entertainment Muay Thai was a redesign to actually produce Western (and other non-Thai) winners. It involved de-skilling the Thai sport simply because Thais were just too good at the more complex things. Yes, it was meant to appeal to International eyes, both in the crowd (tourist shows) and on streams, but the satisfying international element was actually Western (often White) winners of fights, and ultimately championship belts. The de-skilling of the sport and art was about tipping the playing field hard (involving also weigh-in changes that would favor larger bodied international fighters). Thais had to learn - and still have to learn - how to fight like the less skilled Westerners (and others). In some sense its a crazy, upside-down presentation of foreign "superiority", yes driven by hyper Capitalism and digital entertainment, but also one which harkens back to Colonialism where the Western power teaches the "native" "how its really done", and is assumed to just be superior in Nature. The point of fact is that Thais have been arguably the best combat sport fighters in the world over the last 50 years, and it is not without irony that the form of their skill degradation is sometimes framed as a return to Siam/Thai warfare roots. It's not. Its a simplification of ring fighting for the purpose of international appeal. 
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.4k
    • Total Posts
      11.6k
×
×
  • Create New...