Jump to content
bakpao

Learning Muay Thai from a MMA gym

Recommended Posts

HI,

I'm in a situation where a gym I was training at has merged with another gym (old time student), this is really disappointing as I think it was probably the best gym in England.  :ohmy:

Anyway, it moved about a 45 minute drive away which is really inconvenient for me as I have no car. My only other options is either get a personal Muay Thai trainer who I know is good and I can learn a lot from, but is expensive and I won't be regularly or go to a local MMA gym which offers Muay Thai.

This is not an MMA gym that has a specialist Muay Thai trainer or anything like that, its just an MMA coach. I can post a video of their gym session they uploaded to Facebook to show the level of training, but I'm unsure whether that's appropriate. :mellow:

I'm planning to go to Thailand in 3-4 months for training. I want to be fit (as possible) before going to get the most out of training there, but of course improving technique is very important and I'm unsure how much I'll be able to improve going to the MMA gym...

:thanks:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds like either choice will require some level of sacrifice on your part. Either you're trying to make a commute part of your schedule, or you're possibly giving up quality of training. Do they offer a free trial? If so I'd say give it the week/10 days they offer and see how well their training fits your needs. You could get lucky and it might work oht well enough.

 

Also, obligatory American giggle about a 45 minute commute. :P

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds like either choice will require some level of sacrifice on your part. Either you're trying to make a commute part of your schedule, or you're possibly giving up quality of training. Do they offer a free trial? If so I'd say give it the week/10 days they offer and see how well their training fits your needs. You could get lucky and it might work oht well enough.

 

Also, obligatory American giggle about a 45 minute commute. :P

hahaha actually, its kinda my fault, I put 45 minute commute which is relevant to how long it'd take in a car, but as I don't have a car that length is irrelevant. I live in a tiny village and the bus's wouldn't be able to make it to that gyms location, so is kinda not an option... 45 min commute is bearable living in a city, so many options for travel. 

 

My option is to get a personal trainer to my home as often as I can afford, which at the moment would be like two times maximum a month, or go to an MMA gym.

I just don't want it to have a negative impact on my training and pick up things that will hinder my improvement, but at the same time I want to get fit.

I have a trial booked in on Monday with the MMA gym, so hopefully it goes well. :pinch:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm impressed that now even tiny villages have MMA gyms! Go to the MMA gym and ask if you can pay a reduced fee to only go to Muay Thai sessions. If so that's what I would choose. The training won't be as good as a pure Muay Thai gym but I don't think it will hinder your progress by any means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm impressed that now even tiny villages have MMA gyms! Go to the MMA gym and ask if you can pay a reduced fee to only go to Muay Thai sessions. If so that's what I would choose. The training won't be as good as a pure Muay Thai gym but I don't think it will hinder your progress by any means.

Its actually in a nearby town, easily accessible via bus. We have many gyms around here boxing/kickboxing/karate/tkd/judo just not Muay Thai anymore.

I mean the training is of course going to be worse, I hate the idea of MMA gyms teaching Muay Thai though I don't have many options.  :sad:

Regarding the price, I think they have different memberships depending on which classes or how many times a week you want to go. Not sure, will be pretty cheap though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bakpao, I feel you're not too happy about choosing the MMA option, but it's still a place where you will get some exercise, so it will keep you in shape.

And who knows, maybe you'll catch the MMA bug? :D

I can relate to your situation, as I will have to let go of my really great MT trainer in just a month, coz he's going abroad for half a year. So my option is to go back to a trainer I previously trained with, who is really into teaching MMA-style Muay Thai. There are differences in style. He corrects my cool low kick or totally effective leg block. Because it's not effective in MMA. So it's a difficult situation for me AND the trainer, coz I'm there only for Muay Thai and he's aware of it and partly okay with it, but he's so fascinated with MMA, that at the same time he seems a bit pissed off at me doing it the "traditional" way and tends to neglect me in training. Oh and he doesn't like my super great trainer that I love for his Muay Thai! XD I don't know if this works out in the long run, but I have to give it a try. Which I would advise you to do, too.

So, all in all. Depending how the trainer at your new place will put emphasis on the "usefulness" of Muay Thai in MMA, you'll either learn Muay Thai or MMA-style stand-up ;) But in the end, you still learn combinations and work out. So it's better than doing nothing. 

And in Thailand they will change your technique anyway, regardless of what you've trained back home ;) ;) XD

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be interested to know what gym it is that has moved.

I always think its hard moving gyms when you don't want to, I am going through this same thing for other reasons right now and I have to be quite positive at the new gym and try not to compare.  I did a lot of research and in factr a top Thai coach is teaching in an mma gym in london so this is my back up option.  I think trying it out would be a good idea, see what the people are like when you do a group class, see what a private is like. 

 

A friend sent me a link to a gym that is closer than the one I am travelling to and I was put off by the videos so I know how that feels.  I think there is a difference between putting up relatively inexperienced people doing their best in class compared to videos of the head instructor doing the weirdest pads I have ever seen or letting someone doing a private and not correcting their technique at all. 

 

Are you in an area where there are a lot of choices of gyms or is this MMA one your only option?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be interested to know what gym it is that has moved.

I always think its hard moving gyms when you don't want to, I am going through this same thing for other reasons right now and I have to be quite positive at the new gym and try not to compare.  I did a lot of research and in factr a top Thai coach is teaching in an mma gym in london so this is my back up option.  I think trying it out would be a good idea, see what the people are like when you do a group class, see what a private is like. 

 

A friend sent me a link to a gym that is closer than the one I am travelling to and I was put off by the videos so I know how that feels.  I think there is a difference between putting up relatively inexperienced people doing their best in class compared to videos of the head instructor doing the weirdest pads I have ever seen or letting someone doing a private and not correcting their technique at all. 

 

Are you in an area where there are a lot of choices of gyms or is this MMA one your only option?

I'll send the gyms name in a pm.

I know that any gym I go to wont have the same quality as the gym before as they tried to replicate Thai style as much as possible 1 on 1 padwork with trainer, sparring, clinching for long time, etc etc. So I know I'm going to lose quality when changing to another gym, its like you said, when I saw videos of the class it was really low level... 

I'm in an area with a decent amount of gyms within a 1 hour drive, the problem is that most of them are on industrial parks or something similar, so they're inaccessible via bus - and I don't have a car. Whereas the MMA gym is accessible by bus.

The problem isn't that its an MMA gym its that, an MMA coach is teaching Muay Thai.  :ohmy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bakpao, I feel you're not too happy about choosing the MMA option, but it's still a place where you will get some exercise, so it will keep you in shape.

And who knows, maybe you'll catch the MMA bug? :D

I can relate to your situation, as I will have to let go of my really great MT trainer in just a month, coz he's going abroad for half a year. So my option is to go back to a trainer I previously trained with, who is really into teaching MMA-style Muay Thai. There are differences in style. He corrects my cool low kick or totally effective leg block. Because it's not effective in MMA. So it's a difficult situation for me AND the trainer, coz I'm there only for Muay Thai and he's aware of it and partly okay with it, but he's so fascinated with MMA, that at the same time he seems a bit pissed off at me doing it the "traditional" way and tends to neglect me in training. Oh and he doesn't like my super great trainer that I love for his Muay Thai! XD I don't know if this works out in the long run, but I have to give it a try. Which I would advise you to do, too.

So, all in all. Depending how the trainer at your new place will put emphasis on the "usefulness" of Muay Thai in MMA, you'll either learn Muay Thai or MMA-style stand-up ;) But in the end, you still learn combinations and work out. So it's better than doing nothing. 

And in Thailand they will change your technique anyway, regardless of what you've trained back home ;) ;) XD

I actually like MMA, but I don't like the trash talk and the lack of history behind it. I used to do kickboxing a while ago, that got boring too because there's nothing behind it, its just boxing mixed with karate... you know what I mean? No substance, if that's the right thing to say.

 

Yeah that's the issue, because he's so used to thinking of training for MMA, even if he is teaching Muay Thai he's still fitting into scenarios for MMA in his head. So its like, he's teaching Muay Thai but his agenda is for it to suit MMA, lol I don't know how to explain. It's like if you ask a Thai to teach you boxing, it will be suited to their Muay Thai mindset.

So there's the problem of him teaching me MMA style Muay Thai, which isn't too much of a problem I guess cause its only for a few months, I just hope he doesn't try to completely change my style to what he wants, or else that would be a problem. If its just minor things that I can easily solve then I can put up with it.  :sleep:

 

Yeah, that's all I think is, its better than nothing. Just to get fit rather than learn. :ohmy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah that puts a different slant on it.  I know I feel nothing will better my last gym but at least I have someone that fought internationally in Thai as a coach and they are making huge efforts to really improve the feel and classes.

I don't know the reason you don't drive and you don't have to say but is this or a bike licence something you could consider?  Could you get a fold up bike and catch the bus most of the way and cycle the rest.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HI,

I'm in a situation where a gym I was training at has merged with another gym (old time student), this is really disappointing as I think it was probably the best gym in England.  :ohmy:

Anyway, it moved about a 45 minute drive away which is really inconvenient for me as I have no car. My only other options is either get a personal Muay Thai trainer who I know is good and I can learn a lot from, but is expensive and I won't be regularly or go to a local MMA gym which offers Muay Thai.

This is not an MMA gym that has a specialist Muay Thai trainer or anything like that, its just an MMA coach. I can post a video of their gym session they uploaded to Facebook to show the level of training, but I'm unsure whether that's appropriate. :mellow:

I'm planning to go to Thailand in 3-4 months for training. I want to be fit (as possible) before going to get the most out of training there, but of course improving technique is very important and I'm unsure how much I'll be able to improve going to the MMA gym...

:thanks:

Is it feasible to do both? If you could get just a handful of 1-1 sessions to learn technique and then practice those techniques on your own at any kind of facility that could accommodate you, then go to the far-away gym for some sparring or occasional padwork as a workout... is that just way too complicated?

I don't think that what you would be doing at an MMA gym is worthless, even if the level is pretty basic. If you can get repetition in on the things you know to be correct form and practical technique, then it's a reasonable option. Coming to Thailand with a great wealth of technical knowledge isn't, in my mind, as important as coming with a baseline of fitness that allows you to train hard while you're here and pick up as much to bring home with you as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had a similar problem- I recently moved cities and have had to move from a gym I really love to one which is predominantly an MMA gym (I'm not really a fan of MMA at all). I was worried at first but although it's a very different session now, I still really enjoy it and feel I'm learning a lot. There are aspects of my technique which I feel aren't criticised as much now, so I supplement my training by having a couple of private sessions a month with my old coach, even though it's a four hour round trip for me. If you can afford to have a couple of privates a month I'd recommend it. I know it's kind of frowned upon sometimes to skip between gyms like this, but I've been honest with both my trainers about my reasons so they are all cool with it. It's not me saying their training isn't good enough, it's just a way of getting a different type of training and also touching base with a gym I still feel pretty loyal to and owe a lot to. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • This idea of "soul stuff" (from Wolters) is summarized by Michael Charney in his book on Southeast Asian Warfare, woven together with his own thesis from the historical record, that in warfare "soul stuff" could be captured, as expressed in the old cultures of headhunting.
    • On pages 17-19 he introduces the concept of "soul stuff", specifically in the context of the "cognatic kinship" of the lowland regions of Mainland Southeast Asia: This kinship is one in which inheritance and conceptual descent passes equally from males and females. Importantly, powers (rights and otherwise) are not confined by particular gender. These are not family trees of continuous energetic progeny, of men or women, but rather individuals are emphasized by in the genealogy, by their performance. What he is breaking away from is the idea that "power" (however it is conceived, is much less structured by institutional positioning, and not even by lines of familial descent, than by the idea that through performance one can acquire, and also signify personal power..."soul stuff". You didn't get it from your "title" or your father, per se.     If you've been in Thailand long you'll recognize the "big men" of political or social power. He though places this within a larger idea of "prowess", which some sense of martial performance. (In the appendix in the post above emphasis is on spiritual performance, even to the degree of asceticism, in Balinese and Javanese cultures which perhaps DO place more emphasis on direct lineage). The idea he's forwarding though is one of almost spiritual (or even charismatic) social mobility, as endemic to mainland Southeast Asia, achieved through performance, read as "prowess".  
    • This is a transcription of Appendix A of the preeminent anthropologist O. W. Walter's History Culture and Religion in Southeast Asian Perspectives (1982, 1999/2004), covering a very significant principle of his interpretation of early Southeast Asian beliefs. It is for him an essential under-belief which animates meaningful social structures within different SEA cultures, and for the study of the history and meaning of Siam/Thailand's Muay Thai it can be particularly illuminating. It's not a text I could find online, so I put it here. Miscellaneous Notes On "Soul Stuff" and "Prowess" I became interested in the phenomena of "Soul Stuff" when I was studying the "Hinduism" of seventh-century Cambodia and suspected that Hindu devotionalism (bhakti) made sense to the Khmers by a process of self-Hinduization generated by their own notions of what Thomas A. Kirsch, writing about the hill tribes of mainland Southeast Asia, calls "inequality of souls". Among the hill tribes, a person's "soul stuff" can be distinguished from his personal "fate" and the spirit attached to him at birth. "Both the internal quality and the external forces are evidence of his social status." The notion of inequality of souls seems to be reflected in the way Khmer chiefs equate political status with differing levels of devotional capacity. I then began to observe that scholars sometimes found it necessary to call attention to cultural elements in different parts of the lowlands of Southeast Asia which seemed to be connected with the belief that personal success was attributable to an abnormal endowment of spiritual quality. For example, Shelly Errington in her forthcoming book, Memory in Luwu, chapter 1, sumange is the primary source for animating health and effective action in the world, and kerre ("effect") is the visible sign of a dense concentration of sumange. Potent humans and also potent rocks, for example, are said to be in "the state of kerre (makerre)". Sumange is associated with descent from the Creator God and signified by white blood, but this is not always so. Individuals with remarkable prowess can suddenly appear from nowhere, and the explanation is that they are makerre. Kerre is not invariably contingent on white blood.  In Bali the Sanskrit word sakti ("spiritual energy") is associated with Vishnu. Vishnu represents sakti engaged in the world, and a well-formed ancestor group is the social form required to actualize sakti. But sakti is Bali is not related to immobile social situations, for Vishnu's preferred vehicle is "an ascendant, expanding ancestor group." Such a group is led by someone of remarkable prowess.  Benedict Anderson in his essay on "The Idea of Power in Javanese Culture," does not refer to "soul stuff"; his focus is on Power, or the divine energy which animates the universe. The quantum of Power is constant, but its distribution may vary. All rule is based on the belief in energetic Power at the center, and a ruler, often for concentrating or preserving cosmic Power by, for example, ascetic practices. His feat would then be accompanied by other visible signs such as a "divine radiance". The Javanese notion of the absorption of cosmic Power by one person presupposes that only a person of innate quality could set in motion the processes for concentrating cosmic Power by personal effort. On the other hand, the Power this person could deploy in his lifetime inevitably tended to become diffused over the generations unless it was renewed and reinvigorated by the personal efforts of a particular descendant. Anderson's analysis may recall the situation I seemed to detect in seventh-century Cambodia. In both instances ascetic performance distinguished outstanding men from their fellows, and in Luwu as well as in Java visible signs revealed men of prowess and marked them out as leaders of their generation. Again, according to Vietnamese folklore, the effect of a personal spiritual quality is suggested by the automatic response of local tutelary spirits to a ruler's presence, provided that the ruler had already shown signs of achievement and leadership. A local spirit is expected to recognize and be attracted by a ruler's superior quality and compelled to put himself at such a ruler's disposal. I have introduced the topics of "soul stuff" and "prowess" in a discussion of the cultural matrix, and we can suppose that these and other indigenous beliefs remained dominant in the protohistoric period in spite of the appearance of "Hindu" features in documentary evidence. I take the view that leadership in the so called "Hinduized" countries continued to depend on the attribution of personalized spiritual prowess. Signs of a spiritual quality would have been a more effective source of leadership than institutional support. The "Hinduized" polities were elaborations or amplifications of the pre- "Hindu' ones. Did the appearance of Theraveda Buddhism on mainland Southeast Asia  make a difference? Historians and anthropologists with special knowledge must address this question. I shall content myself with noting a piece of evidence brought to my attention by U Tun Aung Chain which refers to the Buddhist concept of "merit". The Burman rulers Alaungmintaya of the second half of the eighteenth century is recorded as having said to the Ayudhya ruler: "My hpon (derived from punna, or "merit") is clearly not on the same level as yours. It would be like comparing a garuda with a dragon-fly, a naga with an earthworm, or the Sun with a fire-fly." Addressing local chiefs he said: "When a man of hpon comes, the man without hpon disappears." [my bold] Here is Buddhist rendering of superior performance in terms of merit-earning in previous lives and the present one, and we are again dealing with the tradition of inequality of spiritual prowess and political status. Are we far removed from other instances of spiritual inequality noted above? The king's accumulated merit had been earned by ascetic performance; the self had to be mastered by steadfastness, mindfulness, and right effort, and only persons of unusual capacity were believed to be able to follow the Path consistently and successfully during their past and present lives. Such a person in Thailand would be hailed for his parami, or possession of the ten transcendent virtues of Buddhism. A Thai friend tells me that parami evokes bhakti ("devotion"), and the linguistic association suggests a rapport comparable with what is indicated in the seventh-century Cambodia and Vietnamese folklore about the tutelary spirits. In all the instances I have sketched, beliefs associated with an individual's spiritual quality rather than with institutional props seem to be responsible for success. Perhaps de la Loubere sensed that same situation in Ayudhya at the end of the seventeenth century when he remarked: "the scepter of this country soon falls from hands that need a support to sustain it." His observation is similar to that of Francisco Colin in the Philippines in the seventeenth century: "honored parents or relatives" were of no avail to an undistinguished son.  Others may wish to develop or modify the basis I have proposed for studying leadership in early societies of Southeast Asia. Explanations of personal performance, achievement, and leadership are required to reify the cultural background reflected in historical records, and in this turn requires study by historians and anthropologists, working in concert, of the indigenous beliefs behind foreign religious terminology.   pages 93-95        
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

    • Sparring was each day, it's part of the training, also each day you go the bagwork and the pads, so i don't know where you got that idea from.  You never go  without hiting the pads or having spar in the Thailand, unless you're in a really bad comercial gym, but the spar there is way different than in other countries, you develop technique there and go sparr without power, by either legs, hands or clinch, depending on the day . As for technique, they always correct you and try to teach it the correct way, they made a good amount of adjustments in my kicking techniques, sweeps and clinch while i was there, i didn't go into such small details because it would take a whole book to write about how much small things they see and try to work on that. Also i don't think you fully read what i wrote in the blogs, because i don't really remember now all the things i wrote, it was a long time ago, but i went on and re-read the first day i wrote, and it already said i did a lot of pads and clinch , knees and elbows , so i don't know where you got the idea that i didn't do pad work. 
    • Hey mate sorry for bumping old thread, im thinking bout going to Manop for 3 months in nov-dec-jan. Everything you described in your posts are what i'm looking for, but there was some things bothering me.   1) From what I read you barely got to spar? Sparring is a huge deal and important for me.. Why didn't you get to spar in the beginning? 2) You seem to spent ALOT of time hitting the bag, why didnt you get more pad-time in the beginning of your training? I really don't know your level and it was hard to tell from the fight 3) (Probably most important) How are they on instructions? Do they correct your technique? how much do they emphesise on that? Do they teach you proper form, sweeps, techniques, tricks, etc? cause from your posts it seemed like you were on your own pretty much the entire stay     Cheers!
    • I'll recommend Elite Sports, Yokkao and Fairtex.
    • If you're having problems seeing then it's time to get a Dr somehow and I'm glad you did. So now, unfortunately all you can do is wait. I have been in similar situations and understand how frustrating it is. Good luck.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.2k
    • Total Posts
      10.9k
×
×
  • Create New...