Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So a thread on concussion got me thinking about this.  

Punch drunk syndrome, or dementia pugilistica, or boxer's syndrome is also called chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). This condition is common among boxers. It is caused by head trauma and the condition typically develops about 16 years after the initial head injury.

Obviously I've heard of it in occurring in boxers, and in MMA, not really heard of it in MT though. Although I do know old western MT fighters who get headaches etc which is not a good sign. In Thailand I have met lots of old fighters,  many are alcoholics but never met anyone with any signs of brain injury, anyone know why this is?

Has anyone else heard anything? does it worry you? Do you think it will be an issue in the future?

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I do know old western MT fighters who get headaches etc which is not a good sign. In Thailand I have met lots of old fighters,  many are alcoholics but never met anyone with any signs of brain injury, anyone know why this is?

 

I was just asking Sylvie how many Thais we've met that seemed a little punch drunk. Only about 3, and we've been exposed to a lot of ex-fighters. One was actually primarily a boxer (lower level WBC title), one a middling long term Thai fighter, and one a big name former big time Thai boxer (but who had fought in the west as well, and also in other martial art tournaments). That's not a lot ex-Thai fighters.

There are two big reasons I can think of. 5 Round fights are much shorter than most boxing matches, and because there are so many weapons and the nature of Thai aesthetics, the head is not targeted in the same way. Almost all strikes are to the head in boxing. Body shots are mostly designed to get to the head. But in Muay Thai there are lots of ways to score other than hitting the head. And even most elbow strikes are meant to cut rather than bludgeon.

Another factor is training. From what I've read concussion syndrome is more closely related to the repeated smaller blows that occur in training, and not so much in single big shots in a fight. Boxing training (often with head gear which does not really protect against concussive force) often involves sitting in the pocket and taking lots of deflected blows (blocked or partially slipped). Thais don't really train like this. They do spar hard at times, but it isn't lots and lots of head-hunting sparring.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This had me thinking for a very long time and I wonder if some of you can add on to this (which relates this post as well) 

I have read some articles [in Boxing] and heard debates about the use of protection [headgear] during sparring and matches. Research has it that there are no "good evidence" that the use of headgear does not prevent head concussions, but could only reduce facial lacerations/cosmetic issues. And unfortunately I have read that it only increases trauma to the brain a whole lot more than "not wearing it" 

Personally, I do own a headgear but I only find it nuisance while training or sparring because it limits by vision. Not only that, I also found that my head ache's more when I get punched on the head; the force feels rather heavier than not wearing head protection. 

During training or matches - The way that western boxing and kickboxing works for points and appeal is the fighter doing whole lot more if you were to "aim for the head" and intend to KO your opponent ASAP. However in Muay Thai (I'm just re-iterating what Kevin said in the above) the scoring is different. 

You know what's interesting lol? Speaking of the use of headgear, I'm not sure if any of you recall this but recently in the Rio 2016 Olympics, boxers no longer use a head gear during matches. Due to basically in the above. However, female fighters were required to have it on. Here's an excerpt from this article: 

As of right now the AIBA’s ban on headgear in amateur fights and at this summer’s upcoming Olympics only extends as far as male heads. For now women fighters will continue to fistfight the old-fashioned way: with a giant, blinding delusion fastened to their vulnerable heads.

The ABIA’s reasoning, according to group President Ching-Kuo Wu, is simple: There just hasn’t been as much research done on the effects of headgear for women boxers as for men. "We have to do this step by step,” Wu said. “Once everything is proved ... then we can start to have some test and consider it in future for women."

http://fightland.vice.com/blog/male-olympic-boxers-will-no-longer-wear-ridiculous-and-dangerous-headgear

Why is that? Is it because females are not as strong as men [to do KO to the head] thus, keeping that clunky headgear protects us from trauma? I'm a little concerned by that retrospective study. In my opinion, I still think that headgear is a no-no (for me anyways) 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I would think it is just because, regardless of security, the Olympics and sports in general are still very misogynistic. I can't see any other reason that, women are more fragile and that women with cuts and bruises is not feminine, is not okay.

It is the same reasons, I believe, women in hockey are not allowed to hit and get hit. I remember watching the last winter Olympics women hockey games and not believing the commentators saying stuff like : "well they are going way too rough, they need to calm down, this is lack of sportsmanship, this is not elegant" and other BS like that. The exact same thing would have happened in men hockey and the commentator would have say: "well that a good clean hit, good intensity". Discouraging.  As if women were not able to hit and get it in Hockey just as men do.

Anyway, can't think of another reason.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Crumbs, when I was a kid and played hockey (not ice hockey - the game on a grass field) at school all the people who taught it said that the most terrifying hockey they ever saw was schoolgirl hockey; not the boys! Back then the rules for boys and girls were slightly different (I'm not sure in what way, and I don't think there is any difference now) and we girls sneered at the boys because they would wear shin pads. We never did; only the goalie was padded up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I agree with Kevin - the body takes a lot more of the abuse in MT, where the majority of blows are aimed at the head in boxing. The few pro boxing gyms I've visited seem to exclusively conduct very hard sparring sessions, so even when not fighting they are taking a significant amount of abuse - probably amplified by the inclusion of headgear. A heavier head creates a greater whiplash effect, which creates more trauma to the brain, etc. 

To take it a step further, the research suggests that concussion risk also has to do with neck to head circumference. If your neck is smaller in relation to your skull, it has a harder time slowing acceleration of the head due to an impact. Increasing neck circumference protects against traumatic brain injury. The amount of time spent clinching develops muscles in and around the neck like nothing else. (Everyone who trains has had that lovely first experience where you can hardly look up for a few days after the first hard clinching session.  :pinch:) There is also an emphasis on strengthening the neck and jaw by biting down on a rope and lifting a weight of some kind with your neck in traditional Thai-style training. Out of all sports, Muay Thai necks have to be up there with the strongest!

Edited to add: I bet Muay Thai fighters in the west traditionally do not spend as much time clinching and strengthening their necks, and probably more time hard sparring, which may have something to do with the differences noticed by the OP. 

Side note: My mom had an interesting discussion about this with one of the neurologists she works with at the hospital. He seemed to think athletes in every contact sport, especially kids and teens, should be doing these exercises. 

Wrestlers are another group that spends a lot of time conditioning their neck, and usually in MMA they are very difficult to knock out. I wonder if they have different rates of CTE as well?

It would be interesting to see some research on neck to head ratios in Muay Thai vs other concussive sports. I suspect it is much closer in the average nak muay than it is in the average boxer. In terms of sheer number of fights, it is amazing that you don't meet more retired MT fighters who are obviously punchy. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • Speculatively, it seems likely that the real "warfare roots" of ring Muay Thai goes back to all the downtime during siege encampment, (and peacetime) Ayutthaya's across the river outer quarters. One of the earliest historical accounts of Siamese ring fighting is of the "Tiger King" disguising himself and participating in plebeian ring fighting. This is not "warfare fighting" and goes back several hundred years. One can imagine that such fighting would share some fighting principles with what occurred on the battlefield, but as it was unarmed and likely a gambling driven sport it - at least to me - likely seems like it has had its very own lineage of development. Less was the case that people were bringing battlefield lessons into the ring, and more that gambled on fighting skills developed ring-to-ring. In such cases of course, developing balance and defensive prowess would be important.  Incidentally, any such Ayutthaya ring-to-ring developments hold the historical potential for lots of cross-pollination from other fighting arts, as Ayutthaya maintained huge mercenary forces, not only from Malaysia and the cusp of islands, but even an entire Japanese quarter, not to mention a strong commercially minded Chinese presence. These may have been years of truly "mixing" fighting arts in the gambling rings of the city (it is unknown just how separatist each culture was in this melting pot, perhaps each kept to their own in ring fighting).
    • For anyone who follows my writings I do not argue for any sense of a "pure" Muay Thai, or even Siamese fighting art history. Quite different than such I take one of Siam and Thai strengths is just how integrative they have been over centuries of development (while, importantly, preserving its core identity). For instance Western Boxing has had a powerful influence upon the form and development of Muay Thai for well over 100 years, and helped make it perhaps the premiere ring fighting art in the world, but Western Boxing itself was a very deep, complexly developed art which mapped quite well upon traditional Muay Thai in many areas, allowing it to flourish. This is quite different than the de-skilling that is happening in the sport right now, where instead the sport is being turned towards a less-skilled development, for really commercial reasons.  The story of whether the influx of attention, branding, not to mention the very important monetary investment that Entertainment Muay Thai has brought will actually help "save" traditional Muay Thai is yet to be written. It very well might, as the sport was reaching some important demographic and cultural dead-ends, and it needed an infusion. But, let's not have it be lost, what itself is being lost, which is the actual very high level of skill Thailand had produced...and how it had developed it. Let's keep our eye on the de-skilling.
    • One of the more slippery aspects of this change is that in its more extreme versions Entertainment Muay Thai was a redesign to actually produce Western (and other non-Thai) winners. It involved de-skilling the Thai sport simply because Thais were just too good at the more complex things. Yes, it was meant to appeal to International eyes, both in the crowd (tourist shows) and on streams, but the satisfying international element was actually Western (often White) winners of fights, and ultimately championship belts. The de-skilling of the sport and art was about tipping the playing field hard (involving also weigh-in changes that would favor larger bodied international fighters). Thais had to learn - and still have to learn - how to fight like the less skilled Westerners (and others). In some sense its a crazy, upside-down presentation of foreign "superiority", yes driven by hyper Capitalism and digital entertainment, but also one which harkens back to Colonialism where the Western power teaches the "native" "how its really done", and is assumed to just be superior in Nature. The point of fact is that Thais have been arguably the best combat sport fighters in the world over the last 50 years, and it is not without irony that the form of their skill degradation is sometimes framed as a return to Siam/Thai warfare roots. It's not. Its a simplification of ring fighting for the purpose of international appeal. 
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.4k
    • Total Posts
      11.6k
×
×
  • Create New...