Jump to content

What Does 'World Title' Really Mean in Thailand's Pro-Am World Championships?


Recommended Posts

I wrote this post for my blog this week: What Does 'World Title' Really Mean in Thailand's Pro-Am World Championships?

It was a difficult one to write because while I have some rather strong feelings about these tournaments and the authenticity of some of the 'world champions' they produce, I really didn't want to attack anyone. Instead, I just wanted to raise an issue that is rarely spoken about. There are multiple pro-am world championship tournaments each year by a handful of different organisatons, and some have shown themselves to be conducted under rather questionable terms. 

"In theory, there is nothing wrong with the idea of tournaments like these. They promote Muay Thai on a worldwide scale and bring fighters, instructors and fans from around the world together. However, it’s integral that they be carried out in an ethical way. That is, a way that upholds integrity and safety for all those involved. This is where they start to lose me".

What do you guys think? Whether you agree or disagree, I'd love to hear your thoughts on this one. 

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You approached this and executed your arguments very fairly, Emma. You always have a very even way of presenting things, so I wasn't surprised, but just really enjoyed your exploration of the problems while still allowing us as readers to believe we can get to something or somewhere better.

It seems that the "world title" doesn't mean much, other than when those two words are put together people who might not know (or care) anything about the sport will have an image of importance. But there's no reason the reality shouldn't carry the weight that the connotation suggestions. In the end it's a money-maker for the hosts and an exciting adventure and perceived accomplishment for those who participate. Like everyone getting a medal for completing the Disney Marathon - you ran the race, so there is something to it. But giving half the participants "world records" as titles for their time doesn't mean what it could, or maybe should. Or at least it should be recognized more readily and widely for what it already is. Which stands for all titles. The growing number of sanctioning bodies means a growing number of titles and a diluting of codified meaning between them. And even the big, long-established groups like the WPMF and WMC do some dodgy business with vacating titles and creating weird weight classes or interim titles. It's very difficult because I don't believe fighters are ever coming at it from a disingenuous place, but there's so little understanding within and across organizations that it's hard to support the objective meaning of the accomplishment while still wanting to support the subjective feeling that participants have in the accomplishment.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Sylvie. It's a difficult topic to talk about without offending people who've won these titles, but it's not a criticism of them at all - just the whole process! I'm really confused by the interim titles as well. Do fighters who win those even get to keep the belts?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just when I wrote that blog post of yours I thought about it again how meaningless those world titles are.

I attended two open amateur world championships. One in London organised by K1, the other one in China organised by the WKU.

For both of the tournaments I ended up having just one opponnent, in China I even fought a German girl ( I am German too). The organisation initially wanted to put together weight classes which would have meant me not only giving a away over 10kg but also 80+ fights experience. Our coaches didnt go through with this, luckily.

I didnt mind having just one opponnent, as long as I get to fight I am happy. But everything around is just crazy. I try to not tell people that I went to a world championship becaus eI think its embarrassing. Not enough fighters and world championships every other week anyway. It is really good for your own marketing, I have to admit that, but Id rather market myself through me fighting and not through a medal I got somewhere for which Im not even proud.

I also know that any of this titles are worked for too, they had to fight for it. But still, why cant they call it a normal tournament...?

The WAKO holds World Cups and Open Championships all the time, the same counts for so many other organisations. I dont think those titles arent worth that much. At least not if you know on how many fights you actually had to get there.

I think if you have an organisation who holds real qualifying tournaments and then you end up in the world championship, different countries are present and you have to work your way up the pool than this has a different significance (and there are organisations who do it that way) It also seems that in light contact kickboxing there are way more fighters and they usually have to work their way up in order to win.

 

I think the most important aspect of any world title, either a world title shot or any championship is the marketing you get, positive adverts for yourself and your gym, also given the fact that for some fights you might have to travel far and you need sponsors to support you, so telling them that you are going to a world championships means getting support much more easy than if you'd go to any other tournament.

 

This topic speaks right out my heart, and it is such a sensitive topic since the fights are still real (most of the time) and you still prepared for those fights.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wrote this post for my blog this week: What Does 'World Title' Really Mean in Thailand's Pro-Am World Championships?

It was a difficult one to write because while I have some rather strong feelings about these tournaments and the authenticity of some of the 'world champions' they produce, I really didn't want to attack anyone. Instead, I just wanted to raise an issue that is rarely spoken about. There are multiple pro-am world championship tournaments each year by a handful of different organisatons, and some have shown themselves to be conducted under rather questionable terms. 

 

"In theory, there is nothing wrong with the idea of tournaments like these. They promote Muay Thai on a worldwide scale and bring fighters, instructors and fans from around the world together. However, it’s integral that they be carried out in an ethical way. That is, a way that upholds integrity and safety for all those involved. This is where they start to lose me".

What do you guys think? Whether you agree or disagree, I'd love to hear your thoughts on this one. 

Emma. This post was fantastic. You expressed your opinions diligently and certainly opened my eyes to some things I was unaware of. Thank you!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Emma. This post was fantastic. You expressed your opinions diligently and certainly opened my eyes to some things I was unaware of. Thank you!

Thank you!  :tongue: Glad you liked it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just to pick up one part of your thoughts Emma - interim titles

A female pro-boxer here Christina McMahon recently won an Interim WBC title, and I had to write about it for work so learned A LOT about titles :)

So basically an interim world title is a world title and is held simultanously with a world title in that weight category

It is offered only when the holder of the world title, who is ranked No 1 in that category is unavailable for a title defence due to serious illness or legal difficulties (I think because of travel). An interim title can only be fought for between the No 2 in that division and a serious contender ie someone ranked in the Top Ten of that division.

Both the interim world title and the world title then co-exist for a short period (not defined) until the No 1 either vacates her title or fights the winner of holder of the Interim Title. If the No 1 vacates, then it is considered that the Interim title-holder is the sole World Title holder for that division. And then the normal procedure happens for challenges etc

It caused a lot of headache for McMahon here as people were talking down her achievement (she won on points against a Zambian opponent, ranked No 2 and the fight was in Zambia - think we all know how hard it is to win on points in the opponent's home!) but she actually is a World Champion under the rules.

Hope that helps :)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to pick up one part of your thoughts Emma - interim titles

A female pro-boxer here Christina McMahon recently won an Interim WBC title, and I had to write about it for work so learned A LOT about titles :)

So basically an interim world title is a world title and is held simultanously with a world title in that weight category

It is offered only when the holder of the world title, who is ranked No 1 in that category is unavailable for a title defence due to serious illness or legal difficulties (I think because of travel). An interim title can only be fought for between the No 2 in that division and a serious contender ie someone ranked in the Top Ten of that division.

Both the interim world title and the world title then co-exist for a short period (not defined) until the No 1 either vacates her title or fights the winner of holder of the Interim Title. If the No 1 vacates, then it is considered that the Interim title-holder is the sole World Title holder for that division. And then the normal procedure happens for challenges etc

It caused a lot of headache for McMahon here as people were talking down her achievement (she won on points against a Zambian opponent, ranked No 2 and the fight was in Zambia - think we all know how hard it is to win on points in the opponent's home!) but she actually is a World Champion under the rules.

Hope that helps :)

Thanks for that! I didn't know any of this, so it definitely does help. I can understand why it must be difficult for interim title winners under criticism. It's not their fault, they just do what they're supposed to do. Isn't Christina 40 years old? Amazing! Congratulations to her. Could you link us to the article you wrote? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is offered only when the holder of the world title, who is ranked No 1 in that category is unavailable for a title defence due to serious illness or legal difficulties (I think because of travel). An interim title can only be fought for between the No 2 in that division and a serious contender ie someone ranked in the Top Ten of that division.

 

This is interesting and perhaps is more functional in pro-boxing, but part of the problem is that accurate and up to date public rankings don't exist for WBC Muay Thai, so it is impossible to tell if someone is in the top 10 or not? Am I maybe missing where the public WBC Muay Thai world rankings of female fighters are kept? As far as I could find the WBC Muay Thai site only shows the ranking of men . The only other source I could find was the WBC Muay Thai wikipedia page which anyone can add to or change, which lists only the champions (no rankings) with most of the weight classes empty:

WBC-female-rankings.png

The most up to date rankings seem to be kept by the WPMF - they've even (recently?) tried to keep track of Interim titles - but these are pretty much significantly out of date as lists, often containing retired or nonactive fighters. I follow the WPMF closely, much less the WBC (mostly because I can't find their active rankings, and their titles seem less frequently fought for in Thailand), and interim titles in the WPMF can seem almost randomly created for events, sometimes even with the weights of fighters not made public. "Interim" becomes a title ex nihilo (albeit between good fighters). On the other hand I also seem to remember the WBC "creating" a World Title fight in the 100 lb division, a division I don't even think existed. And then, if I'm not wrong, another "International Belt" title last August between fighters I don't think are ranked by them (at least one I suspect wasn't). The bottom line is that if rankings are not kept up to date and made public it is really hard to even know who is fighting and why? The WMC website also does not keep female fighter rankings, or up to date champions.

I agree with Emma that this isn't the faults of fighters in the least. You fight on a card, you are told it is for a title. All you can do is enthusiastically fight.

I do feel for these organizations because they are political bodies and keeping up websites is probably low on their list of priorities. But it would make a world of difference to the growth of the sport and their organizations as well if we could follow along with how they rank fighters.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Reflecting back on Emma's article I include this video of the 2015 WMO World Championship Title fight at 51 kg - a category that apparently had only 2 people in it. A fight to become World Champion.

[update, July 27, 2015: The winner of this fight Jade Sirisompan has changed the setting of the video to private]

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I ran into this article on the 2012 WMC World Title fights in Phuket. Warning, it is an extremely sharp-tongued, and very likely to some, offensive rant. It's hard to know if the author had axes to grind with specific fighters or gyms, but to those not there it does give a sense that all was not right with this event. In fact the Claire Haigh title fight is a fight that actually spurred Caley Reece to retire (the first time). By Caley's admission that world title meant a ton and it really hit her hard to have it given away. Since then organizations seem to have adopted the "interim" title as the way to go, something they don't always make clear in publicizing events where belts seem to be fought for in every fight. After this event it feels like the WMC started to recede from female fighting somehow, and the WPMF has stepped forward some. The WMC once was the dominant body.

Of course the fighters just fight, no fault to them. You fight who is put in front of you. And running sactioning bodies in Thailand must be something like herding cats, with everyone looking out for individual interests, and exercising leverage to some degree. It's just to say that maybe progress is needed.

The above fight is the fight the author is most disturbed by, Tracy Lockwood vs Gerry Rawai. The final round indeed was cut short, only about 1:10 in length.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • Muay Thai, Colonialism and "Techniques" not a competition, its a celebration There is a lot that is culturally complex in how the West (and others) interact with the traditional Muay Thai of Thailand, and honestly it is worth of analysis and thinking about. It's likely full of contradictions, and doesn't present only a single picture of motivations, but...there is one thing that is pretty common place and intense, and that is the way that fighters, coaches and various purveyors of information on Muay Thai to the West, usually in the form of demo'd techniques, simply present themselves as "experts", as if their knowledge, what they came to is simply something OF them. It becomes the signature of their authority and value, especially in social media contexts where a lot of platform reach comes from "demos" of one kind or another. This is just a serious trend, a pattern. But really it is almost inexcusable when sharing or teaching others not to share where and even more importantly WHO learned something you are demoing from. Almost uniformly, it wasn't something you learned from yourself. This means, with every share you are actively erasing the past, the actual lineage of that knowledge, you are erasing the people who actually knew something more than you, and you are removing their importance for anyone who might be interested in what you are sharing. This is pretty extreme, in that it is quite widespread. One of the biggest problems Muay Thai has right now is that as it internationizes, as it reaches for more commercial markets, so many of its roots are being erased...it has less and less concrete rootedness. And while this may help it spread quickly, charged up by the popularity of influencers and such, soil without roots will just wash away when there is a change in season. The roots are what holds everything together. Further of course, if you aren't naming teachers, krus, padmen and coaches that gave you that bit of information you are undermining the entire hope of Thailand in sharing Muay Thai in the world. You are erasing the very thought that you have to go to Thailand to learn specific things (or, in other countries well educated krus and gyms), the notion that to learn something better or more completely you should go further down the coaching tree, further into the roots. This was a huge motivation for pretty much everything Sylvie has done. Her path started learning kind of psuedo-Muay Thai from a strip mall gym that had a lot of TDK in the mix, but there was the photo of a guy on the wall who had taught the head coach of the gym his Muay Thai. This was "Master K", Sylvie's first Thai teacher. What do we do? We go to the teacher of the teacher. And this is exactly what lead us to Thailand, eventually to the Muay Thai Library documentary project itself. It's been an instinct from the beginning, but also a motivating value. Shine the light backwards. The teacher always will know some things the student will not. Because the teacher's knowledge comes from something very complex, a lived experience that is full of details and reasons and contexts that don't get filtered down into the particular technique. The teacher is full of richness and intensity...and its our job to raise up and preserve the teacher, to pull them into the present, and thus into the future. And this should be done with every share of technique possible. It should be just regular, not only etiquette, but also passion to bring the sources of what you know forward with you, and build a picture of knowledge that immediately causes people to look past you, before you, when they learn something. The krus, coaches and padmen need to be known. If you've been to Thailand and trained seriously you already know that many Thai padmen in gyms in some ways know more much more about Muay Thai than you'll ever know, even if you are a very experienced fighter. Muay Thai needs for us not to erase its own past, it needs to stop cutting off the vines below the flower. It is just amazing to me that so many shares of technique do not automatically tell of where it came from...who it came from. This doesn't mean you have to authorize your knowledge, because you got it from someone more famous, or more esteemed than someone else. As I said, there are so, so many in Thailand who are just brimming with knowledge who are almost completely unknown to but a few. Common padmen just walking experts of Muay Thai, padmen who don't have even much social standing in their own gym. Lift these names. Inspire people to connect to your own knowledge tree. It's not a competition, its a celebration.  There are many krus that we've documented in the Muay Thai Library who are not or were not social important krus or padmen, but they are full incredible knowledge and wisdom. Raising their names, and sharing their muay is absolutely vital, and can change their lives as well. There are so many example of this, even very famous names now. Sharing can be something as simple as: "Point your toes up on checked kicks, this is something learned from Kru Big at Sinbi [made up name] and a few other places as well" or,  "Hook-lowkick is a great go-to combo, this is a mainstay of the Sitmonchai style started with Kru Dam" or, "Kru Toi always told me to use the teep more in fights, and its something I've had success in when I did it".   It's just a way of talking about advice or demonstrated knowledge. Also, if this became more regular it would undercut just people cribbing demo advice from other content sharers, other influencers or breakdownists of varying quality, something that thins out the knowledge base. There isn't must wrong with learning from other sharers, but maybe just mention that you have? Create and build lineages, and inspire others to do the same. Muay Thai itself needs this.
    • "I don't know anything about tennis, but the one hitting the ball harder is clearly winning." Sylvie's brilliant encapsulation of Western advisements of how trad Muay Thai should be fought.
    • I put together this compilation of little notes Sylvie has taken in a stretch of training and sharing Muay Thai, and was surprised that there is a full 30 minutes of these. I'm just struck and really almost shocked at how much knowledge she drops and the nature of it. These are not "demos" of techniques, but looking beneath or within techniques, something that comes from being closely connected to techniques for many many years, and her self-transformation. I can't think of another person in the world who could drop notes like this, of this much variety, because this just comes out of her path. These are like reading notes of Muay Thai. It's a very interesting, and kind of inspiring level of knowledge. She's a walking encyclopedia of experience and knowledge.  That foot-drop taught by Manop is just this kind of thing. It's not "technique", its a piece of a technique, but its related to a generative principle that informs all sorts of other techniques, and even can touch all of your Muay Thai. There are so many of those.   
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

    • Hi all, Does anyone know of any suppliers for blanks (Plain items to design and print a logo on) that are a good quality? Or put me in the right direction? thanks all  
    • The first fight between Poot Lorlek and Posai Sittiboonlert was recently uploaded to youtube. Posai is one of the earliest great Muay Khao fighters and influential to Dieselnoi, but there's very little footage of him. Poot is one of the GOATs and one of Posai's best wins, it's really cool to see how Posai's style looked against another elite fighter.
    • Yeah, this is certainly possible. Thanks! I just like the idea of a training camp pre-fight because of focus and getting more "locked in".. Do you know of any high level gyms in europe you would recommend? 
    • You could just pick a high-level gym in a European city, just live and train there for however long you want (a month?). Lots of gyms have morning and evening classes.
    • Hi, i have a general question concerning Muay-Thai training camps, are there any serious ones in Europe at all? I know there are some for kickboxing in the Netherlands, but that's not interesting to me or what i aim for. I have found some regarding Muay-Thai in google searches, but what iv'e found seem to be only "retreats" with Muay-Thai on a level compareable to fitness-boxing, yoga or mindfullness.. So what i look for, but can't seem to find anywhere, are camps similar to those in Thailand. Grueling, high-intensity workouts with trainers who have actually fought and don't just do this as a hobby/fitness regime. A place where you can actually grow, improve technique and build strength and gas-tank with high intensity, not a vacation... No hate whatsoever to those who do fitness-boxing and attend retreats like these, i just find it VERY ODD that there ain't any training camps like those in Thailand out there, or perhaps i haven't looked good enough?..  Appericiate all responses, thank you! 
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.4k
    • Total Posts
      11.4k
×
×
  • Create New...