Jump to content

The End of Female Muay Thai (the Muay of Thailand)?


Recommended Posts

Muay Thai of Thailand in the West

When Caley Reece retired I mentioned to her that with her probably passes the last high profile western female fighter who fights in what might be termed a "Thai style" in that she is both a crisp fighter with Thai techniques who also strongly favors clinch and fought professional Muay Thai - at the time it was very hard to think of another female fighter like this. Tiffany van Soest, who carried the torch of Muay Thai stardom in America was really a Karate style fighter who fought under (and succeeded in) Muay Thai rules. In fact I recall that after some difficulty in the ring Tiffany said she had to get back to her Karate roots. Iman Barlow, who also vies for the unspoken title of "best female Muay Thai fighter in the World" doesn't really fight Muay Thai rules any longer (2 Muay Thai fights in the last 2 years), instead fighting very frequently for K1 style Enfusion, along with many other top talents. I'm also not quite sure how "Thai" her style is, in the sense that she prefers not to fight in Thailand, and fights with great pressure and aggression. Anissa Meksen, another top Muay Thai western name, fights from a very heavy Savate background (11 years Savate champion). Jorina Baars is very Dutch in her style. Clinch fighters like Teressa Wintermyr are nearing the end of their careers, and now that Tiffany is moving onto MMA, likely to the UFC (with a brief stop over in Glory/Invicta), and with the UFC absorbing big names like Valentina Shevchenko, or turning Jedrzejczyk into a name, there is a real sense that as much as female Muay Thai seems to be growing, in a strange way the western female Muay Thai of Thailand (Thai-style) is ending.

Yes, women will still come to Thailand to train and pick up techniques, but as fighters are pulled more and more into non-Muay Thai promotions, variations of kickboxing, and "Muay Thai" itself becomes a broad international style, it could be that the Muay of Thailand for women is waning.

Thai-vs-Chinese-female-fight-001.jpg

The Muay Thai of Thailand, Internationally

This is speaking of the west. But even for Thai female fighters the pressure away from traditional Muay Thai has been happening for several years now. First it seemed to be the draw to go fight in Japan for significant purses that could not be had in Thailand (easily). I'm not an expert on these fights, but of those I've seen it has often involved female Thai fighters being beat on under rules they did not fully understand or were unprepared for (Shoot Box, for instance), or having Japanese Muay Thai champions face Thai opponents who were sometimes not the top tier, or outside of their natural weight class. This felt somewhat Nationalistic to me, as Japan has always had a tension with Thailand ever since it tried to steal (perfect?) Muay Thai as "Kickboxing" in the 1960s, a Muay Thai that challenged the supremacy of Karate in many ways. The Japanese want to beat Thais. Again, I'm no expert, this goes back much further than when I started paying attention, but in watching recent female champions in a few weight classes closely it seems like the best Thai fighters are no longer invited to fight for Muay Thai belts in Japan, and even that Japanese champions sometime come to Thailand somewhat quietly, and fight what they believe to be lower level names. This has left some of the best Thai female fighters without a chance at more international acclaim.

One has to add to this the more recent trend of Thai fighters being more or less "set up" to fight (and lose to) Chinese fighters. The first time we witnessed this was on the Queen's Birthday fights a few years ago. There was a bizarre match up of a very robust, almost hulking Chinese female fighter tossing around a Thai fighter in some of the oddest rules I've seen in Thailand - it was unexpected because this was a National holiday typically celebrating Thai female fighting. The Chinese fighter was basically ragdolling the Thai girl around the ring with hip throws and whatever else, in a part of the broadcast that was being sent to China (I believe). It was pretty stunning. Since then, and probably before, there are similar fights between Chinese and Thai female fighters, in Thailand, with rules designed to benefit the Chinese fighter, televised back to China (I presume). Thai female fighters also gain big purses flying out to China to (sometimes) be bludgeoned, again, under similar rules in what also seem to be unfair weight disadvantages. Again, it feels like Thai female fighters are serving what is essentially a Nationalism of another country.

All of this makes me wonder about the future of the Muay of Thailand for female fighters, even as female Muay Thai in Thailand seems to be receiving its widest reach and appreciation. The growing, looming wealth of China will likely only increase these kinds of Nationalistic matchups, a Wushu nation seeking to dramatize it's potency in real terms. and in the west the expansive pressure of the UFC and all its ripples in the pond (various "stand up MMA" striking promotions), may lead to an Internationalization of Muay Thai that will take "female Muay Thai" further and further from the Muay of Thailand, just as Muay Thai opportunity is expanding for female Thais within their country...and this is not even taking into account the pronounced globalizing success of the IFMA, which is quietly bringing about significant changes in the sport.

It may be as simple as the fact that the Thai-style rule set and scoring aesthetic does not exist outside of Thailand, so it is hard pressed to imagine that the Muay of Thailand could exists in anything outside of pockets of "Purists" who seek to preserve the artform in the west, or the proliferation of techniques and tone from former Thai fighters turned international coaches and therefore ambassadors for the sport. This is something that all of Muay Thai is facing. But, because of the precarious nature of female Muay Thai, the reality that far fewer women fight or train seriously when compared to men, shifts in style, trends in popularity and maybe more importantly opportunity, can have a much more powerful, and perhaps categorical effect on female fighting than they may on male fighting. As the United States loses its one female Muay Thai star to kickboxing, and then inevitably to MMA, a star who herself was perhaps a Karate fighter at core, one has to wonder just what the future of the Muay of Thailand is for female fighting. Will the Muay of Thailand become anything more for female fighters than a collection of techniques (spinning elbows, teeps, knees) added to a style simply known as "striking"?

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good post Kevin! I agree that the Thai version will only exist in the West among a small group of purists, but it seems like that is how it has always been. Another factor which might have an effect on the Thai style is the (growing?) feeling in Thailand that scoring is too influenced by the gamblers. Samart put out a video on youtube where he said the Thai scoring is set up to benefit gamblers(easy to throw a fight by losing balance, etc) and leads to fights which only show off some of Muay Thai's beautiful weapons(way more kicks and knees than punches and elbows).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Samart put out a video on youtube where he said the Thai scoring is set up to benefit gamblers(easy to throw a fight by losing balance, etc) and leads to fights which only show off some of Muay Thai's beautiful weapons(way more kicks and knees than punches and elbows).

 

Regarding the problems of gambling and it ruining Muay Thai in Thailand, I just don't buy it. The reason I don't by it is that in the Golden Age Muay Thai was basically run by huge, powerful mafia. The grip over Muay Thai was so strong that there were assassination attempts (shootings, a bombing) at Lumpinee. Gambling was the promotional bedrock of the greatest Muay Thai we've known, it's not a suddenly strong influence - gambling is likely expressing something within the culture, not artificially imposing something. This is probably a very nuanced history, but great fighters of the Golden Age notoriously lost their careers by throwing fights.

But staying focused on female Muay Thai, female Muay Thai in Thailand has its own short, minor history and sub-culture. One of the things we seemed to glean from the gamblers in female MT matchups, is that gamblers love Sylvie because she fights. And she fights hard. There seems to be a sense from at least some Thais that as female Thai fighters adopt a very "femur" (technical) fighting style, lots of retreat, point-scoring kicks, evasion, that they aren't really fighting. Even though Sylvie is a clinch fighter, some Thais seem to read this as real fighting, forcing the Thai fighter to fight. The technical approach, at least among female fighters, can be read as anti-fighting. If I would guess, this may also be how many Thai female fighters are viewed in Japan (or China), as anti-fighters, fighters who won't fight, in promotions where aggression is esteemed. I think that some of this same thirst for "real fighting" also exists at the level of male Muay Thai too. I think that's why shows like Thai Fight and Max Muay Thai are having wide televised audience success - these are often circus-like shows, but very popular, and their popularity should be telling us something. They are offering "aggression" in contrast to the more controlled fighting style of traditional Muay Thai. This may also be key to why MMA is starting to take a small foothold in younger generations. I'm not saying that this is a good thing, but I really don't think that the economic decline of Muay Thai in Thailand is because there aren't enough techniques being shown at Lumpinee. It may be even the opposite. Technical fighting may not have widespread appeal.

The power vs technique question has been a long running one, and I'm sure it goes much further back than when Samart lost to Dieselnoi who just clinched and kneed, a loss that still probably stings. But this is why I say that in particular to female Muay Thai, the style of Muay Thai in Thailand, for women, may be in a precarious place. It is caught up in this much wider march towards power fighting and aggression, which is really typified by the International populist ethos of MMA, and its various step-child promotions of kickbox striking.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just this morning I had an interesting experience with Pi Nu. He was having me do these "sok glap" (reverse elbow) on the pads, which he sees as a "trick" and wants me to do for two reasons: 1) confidence and 2) I'm fighting in a show that will expect this kind of thing. He had me throw a bunch of them, then kind of muttered that because I'm a westerner this move is good. "When Thai do it, everybody yak yak," he said. He uses "yak yak" to mean gossiping or complaining. 

How interesting! We hate-watch Max every weekend and the worst fights have just endless spinning back elbows; off-balance, not landing... total crap. But a lot of them. Westerners do most of them, but the Thai fighters have picked it up as well, as a way to try to win the "super bonus," which is extra cash. Pi Nu gave me no explanation for why people would talk shit about Thai fighters for that elbow. I'd assume it's because they never land, so you look like a tool-bag spinning around and ending up with your back taken or off-balance or whatever. That's what the westerners often look like. But given the major complaint of ex-fighters of Pi Nu's age and a bit older, which is the complaint Samart made, that fighters now days just fight enough to win and don't show any technique... well, clearly the flashy and mostly ineffective reverse elbow isn't one of them.

I wonder if it's that fighters used to have very distinct styles. Dieselnoi's knees, Yodkhunpon's elbows, Apidej's kicks, or Samart's overall finesse but slick boxing and teeps especially... I can pick out some tendencies in modern fighters, but not like these guys. Maybe what people see now is that there's less distinction. Like how the Ram Muay used to be unique to gyms but now they all pretty much look the same. 

When I was training with Dieselnoi the other day I asked him what fighters he likes now. He thought about it for a minute (a lot of men his age don't, they just immediately say everybody today sucks), then shook his head and said nobody really. It's a common answer, that fighters now can't hold a candle to the Golden Age. But he gave an interesting addendum to that assessment, which I've never heard from any others like him. He said that before you had these top fighters and champions who had to fight each other - the best fighting the best. He says now you have these great fighters but they're under different promoters, so they don't fight each other. The best are protected from the best. Like how you don't see very many "super fights" in the UFC and none in boxing anymore.

There aren't a lot of famous female fighters in Thailand. I can probably count on one hand the very top names and they're usually not in the same weight classes as each other. And those who are, won't fight each other because "we're friends." And their gyms go along with this because of money and reputation, I think. Same reason Anderson Silva and Machida - one weight class apart, it is possible, but they wouldn't do it - wouldn't fight. But if there's no money for top female fighters, then there's no fights for top female fighters. The woman in the photo that Kevin shared above is Mary from Thailand (facing the camera; the woman with her back to the camera is Chinese) and she's a good fighter, well-established, good name, etc. She's 25, which is "old" for a female fighter; it's even a bit old for a male fighter. But fighting in China is good money for a Thai and it happens more or less in a vacuum, so it doesn't matter for her reputation or her career overall. I think the thing that's killing female Muay Thai is that there's nowhere to go. What's killing male Muay Thai is that what used to be really prestigious simply isn't anymore. And as interest by generations of Thais wanes, while interest by westerners picks up, the audience will have great affect on how the aesthetic develops. Sports are living things, they change, and the tendency is always to say that how it used to be was always better. I expect Muay to change and I don't think that's a bad thing. But it's still painful in some ways. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • Some notes on the predividual (from Simondon), from a side conversation I've been having, specifically about how Philosophies of Immanence, because they tend to flatten causation, have lost the sense of debt or respect to that which has made you. One of the interesting questions in the ethical dimension, once we move away from representationalist thinking, is our relationship to causation.   In Spinoza there is a certain implicit reverence for that to which you are immanent to. That which gave "birth" to you and your individuation. The "crystal" would be reverent to the superstaturated solution and the germ (and I guess, the beaker). This is an ancient thought.   Once we introduce concepts of novelness, and its valorization, along with notions of various breaks and revolutions, this sense of reverence is diminished, if not outright eliminated. "I" (or whatever superject of what I am doing) am novel, I break from from that which I come from. Every "new" thing is a revolution, of a kind. No longer is a new thing an expression of its preindividual, in the ethical/moral sense.   Sometimes there are turns, like in DnG, where there is a sort of vitalism of a sacred. I'm not an expression of a particular preindividual, but rather an expression of Becoming..a becoming that is forever being held back by what has already become. And perhaps there is some value in this spiritualization. It's in Hegel for sure. But, what is missing, I believe, is the respect for one's actual preindividual, the very things that materially and historically made "you" (however qualified)...   I think this is where Spinoza's concept of immanent cause and its ethical traction is really interesting. Yes, he forever seems to be reaching beyond his moment in history into an Eternity, but because we are always coming out of something, expressing something, we have a certain debt to that. Concepts of revolution or valorized novelty really undercut this notion of debt, which is a very old human concept which probably has animated much of human culture.   And, you can see this notion of immanent debt in Ecological thought. It still is there.   The ecosystem is what gave birth to you, you have debt to it. Of course we have this sense with children and parents, echo'd there.   But...as Deleuze (and maybe Simondon?) flatten out causation, the crystal just comes out of metastable soup. It is standing there sui generis. It is forever in folds of becoming and assemblages, to be sure, but I think the sense of hierarchy and debt becomes obscured. We are "progressing" from the "primitive".   This may be a good thing, but I suspect that its not.   I do appreciate how you focus on that you cannot just presume the "individual", and that this points to the preindividual. Yes...but is there not a hierarchy of the preindividual that has been effaced, the loss of an ethos.   I think we get something of this in the notion of the mute and the dumb preindividual, which culminates in the human, thinking, speaking, acting individuation. A certain teleology that is somehow complicit, even in non-teleological pictures.   I think this all can boil down to one question: Do we have debt to what we come from?   ...and, if so, what is the nature of that debt?   I think Philosophies of Immanence kind of struggle with this question, because they have reframed.   ...and some of this is the Cult of the New. 3:01 PM Today at 4:56 AM   Hmmmm yeah. Important to be in the middle ground here I suspect. Enabled by the past, not determined by it. Of course inheritance is rather a big deal in evolutionary thought - the bequest of the lineage, as I often put it. This can be overdone, just as a sense of Progress in evolution can be overdone - sometimes we need to escape our past, sometimes we need to recover it, revere it, re-present it. As always, things must be nuanced, the middle ground must be occupied. 4:56 AM   Yes...but I think there is a sense of debt, or possibly reverence, that is missing. You can have a sense of debt or reverence and NOT be reactive, and bring change. Just as a Native American Indian can have reverence for a deer he kills, a debt. You can kill your past, what you have come from, what you are an expression of...but, in a deep way.   Instead "progress" is seen as breaking from, erasing, denying. Radical departure.   The very concept of "the new" holds this.   this sense of rupture.   And pictures of "Becoming" are often pictures of constant rupture.   new, new, new, new, new, new...   ...with obvious parallels in commodification, iterations of the iphone, etc.   In my view, this means that the debt to the preindividual should be substantive. And the art of creating individuation means the art of creating preindividuals. DnG get some of this with their concept of the BwOs.   They are creating a preindividual.   But the sense of debt is really missing from almost all Immanence Philosophy.   The preindividual becomes something like "soup" or intensities, or molecular bouncings.   Nothing really that you would have debt to. 12:54 PM   Fantasies of rupture and "new" are exactly what bring the shadow in its various avatars with you, unconsciously.     This lack of respect or debt to the preindividual also has vast consequences for some of Simondon's own imaginations. He pictures "trade" or "craft" knowledge as that of a childhood of a kind, and is quite good in this. And...he imagines that it can become synthesized with his abstracted "encyclopedic" knowledge (Hegel, again)...but this would only work, he adds, if the child is added back in...because the child (and childhood apprenticeships) were core to the original craft knowledge. But...you can't just "add children" to the new synthesis, because what made craft knowledge so deep and intense was the very predindividual that created it (the entire social matrix, of Smithing, or hunting, or shepherding)...if you have altered that social matrix, that "preindividual" for knowledge, you have radically altered what can even be known...even though you have supplemented with abstract encyclopedic knowledge. This is something that Muay Thai faces today. The "preindividual" has been lost, and no amount of abstraction, and no about of "teaching children" (without the original preindividual) will result in the same capacities. In short, there is no "progressive" escalation of knowledge. Now, not everything more many things are like a fighting art, Muay Thai...but, the absence of the respect and debt to preindividuality still shows itself across knowledge. There are trends of course trying to harness creativity, many of which amount to kind of trying to workshop preindividuality, horizontal buisness plan and build structures, ways of setting up desks or lounge chairs, its endless. But...you can't really "engineer" knowledge in this way...at least not in the way that you are intending to. The preindividual comes out of the culture in an organic way, when we are attending to the kinds of deeper knowledge efficacies we sometimes reach for.
    • "He who does not know how to read only sees the differences. For him who knows how to read, it all comes to the same thing, since the sentence is identical. Whoever has finished his apprenticeship recognizes things and events, everywhere and always, as vibrations of the same divine and infinitel sweet word. This does not mean that he will not suffer Pain is the color of certain events. When a man who can and a man who cannot read look at a sentence written in red ink, they both see the same red color, but this color is not so important for the one as for the other."   A beautiful analogy by Simone Weil (Waiting for God), which especially in the last sentence communicates how hard it is to discuss Muay Thai with those who don't know how to "read" its sentences. Yes, I see the effort. Yes, I see the power. Yes, I even see the "technique"...but this is like talking about the color of sentences written out at times.
    • from Reddit discussing shin pain and toughening of the shins: There are several factors, and people create theories on this based on pictures of Muay Thai, but honestly from my wife's direct experience they go some what numb and hard from lots of kicking bags and pads, and fighting (in Thailand some bags could get quite hard, almost cement like in places). Within a year in Thailand Sylvie was fighting every 10 or 12 days and it really was not a problem, seldom feeling much pain, especially if you treat them properly after damage, like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztzTmHfae-k and then more advanced, like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcWtd00U7oQ And they keep getting harder. After a few years or so Sylvie felt like she would win any shin clash in any fight, they just became incredible hard. In this video she is talking about 2 years in about how and why she thought her shins had gotten so hard: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFXCmZVXeGE she shows in the vid how her shins became kind of permanently serrated, with divots and dings. As she discusses only 2 years in (now she's 13 years of fighting in) very experienced Thais have incredibly hard shins, like iron. Yes, there are ideas about fighting hard or not, but that really isn't the determining factor from our experience with Sylvie coming up on 300 fights and being around a lot of old fighters. They just can get incredibly tough. The cycles of damage and repair just really change the shin (people in the internet like to talk about microfractures and whatnot). Over time Sylvie eventually didn't really need the heat treatment anymore after fights, now she seldom uses it. She's even has several times in the last couple of years split her skin open on checks without even feeling much contact. Just looked down and there was blood.  
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

    • Hi all, Does anyone know of any suppliers for blanks (Plain items to design and print a logo on) that are a good quality? Or put me in the right direction? thanks all  
    • The first fight between Poot Lorlek and Posai Sittiboonlert was recently uploaded to youtube. Posai is one of the earliest great Muay Khao fighters and influential to Dieselnoi, but there's very little footage of him. Poot is one of the GOATs and one of Posai's best wins, it's really cool to see how Posai's style looked against another elite fighter.
    • Yeah, this is certainly possible. Thanks! I just like the idea of a training camp pre-fight because of focus and getting more "locked in".. Do you know of any high level gyms in europe you would recommend? 
    • You could just pick a high-level gym in a European city, just live and train there for however long you want (a month?). Lots of gyms have morning and evening classes.
    • Hi, i have a general question concerning Muay-Thai training camps, are there any serious ones in Europe at all? I know there are some for kickboxing in the Netherlands, but that's not interesting to me or what i aim for. I have found some regarding Muay-Thai in google searches, but what iv'e found seem to be only "retreats" with Muay-Thai on a level compareable to fitness-boxing, yoga or mindfullness.. So what i look for, but can't seem to find anywhere, are camps similar to those in Thailand. Grueling, high-intensity workouts with trainers who have actually fought and don't just do this as a hobby/fitness regime. A place where you can actually grow, improve technique and build strength and gas-tank with high intensity, not a vacation... No hate whatsoever to those who do fitness-boxing and attend retreats like these, i just find it VERY ODD that there ain't any training camps like those in Thailand out there, or perhaps i haven't looked good enough?..  Appericiate all responses, thank you! 
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.4k
    • Total Posts
      11.5k
×
×
  • Create New...