Jump to content

Questions about Muay Thai "Authenticity" in the West


Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, Kevin von Duuglas-Ittu said:

I'm very torn on this. I am 100% opposed to drill based fighting teaching, I think it's a cop out. Yes, there is a place for drills to be sure, and Thais indeed drill basics in the very young, but there is no expressive sport in the world where the elite, poetic fighters became that way primarily through drills. I say this though fully knowing that the west HAS to drill. It's in the very fabric of the business model of teaching. Drills are essentially mechanical abstractions of a living art, exported from that art, and put into an assembly line of a kind. Yes, the assembly line can and does produce working models of something, just like it can produce cars, or widgets, but the very act of abstraction, of mechanization for the purposes of duplicaiton, is killing the art of what Muay Thai is...in my opinion. As I say though, the west simply has no choice. It's like having to teach people how to play baseball in a land where no baseball fields exist. You can learn all kinds of "things" done on a baseball field, but if you don't have baseball fields you'll never really know what baseball is, or really have ever played it.

It depends on whether the drill is understood properly. All the best amateur and professional boxers drill, so do the best wrestlers and other grapplers. It's when they ONLY drill or the drills don't represent well what you're supposed to be doing that the problems begin. The best boxers in the amateurs are using the cuban and russian models and it's heavily focussed around realistic drilling. Drills aren't mechanisation unless the drills are all that you do. 

The way those Russian guys do it keep the drill very close to sparring while in control, allowing it to bleed over. That's how you can have an undersized fighter like Ramazanov outwork and outmanoeuvre Petchmorakot from the weight division above him. I think you say it yourself when you say that the Thai's drill the basics in the very young, it's not because they're necessarily young but because they're the beginners. 

Drills aren't removed from any artistry, opera singers drill vocal technique, illustrators will drill shapes. They're a part of it and a big part of what create the best fighters in the world, they're just not the be all and end all. I don't think that Thailand necessarily has the best approach to teaching and learning - I think they simply have the best learning environment in which to develop. 

That is why I also mention that in addition to the drill I'll teach the concept. If I introduce you to a concept like say for example changing levels, and that is just the concept, through drilling free-form you'll find your own ways to change level and operate as a fighter. Thai's do this, I just don't think they would necessarily explain this to you in the same way. Like, the vast majority of the time when I watch Sylvie working with a legend, she IS drilling. She's drilling in a way that I would call drilling, or what a Russian would call drilling - but maybe not in a way that an American will notice as drilling. There's subjectivity to it.

Edited by AndyMaBobs
  • Cool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A  fun drill to encourage creativity that I get anyone who works with me to do:

Person A - uses a technique, any technique, or combination etc. 

Person B - responds with their own one, but one different

Both fighters are allowed to check and otherwise defend during all of them.

They go back and forth, after doing it for about two minutes, they're allowed to interrupt each others combination. Power is about 50% - 60% to the body + legs, 20% to the head (The English tend to be big lads, don't want to take any risks there). The students learn techniques from each other that way - but also they learn the timing to properly interrupt each other. It eventually turns into something like light sparring. 

What in my experience I find is that my students end up being far more experimental in sparring. They're not stiff and they learn defence in a more organic way (I posted my fighters first competition, and that sort of drilling gave him his movement, which is still raw but very much there). 

Those 1,2,3 kick type of drills, for me, only serve the purpose of getting the fighter comfortable with the movement and becoming defensively responsible.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AndyMaBobs said:

That's how you can have an undersized fighter like Ramazanov outwork and outmanoeuvre Petchmorakot from the weight division above him.

A few things about that fight.

1. ONE calls what they put on "Muay Thai", but it isn't Muay Thai. It isn't reffed like Muay Thai, nor scored like Muay Thai. It is sad that it is becoming a layman's reference for what Muay Thai is, around the world. I say this well beyond this fight.

2. I like Ramazanov a lot, for a non-Thai. To be sure. But he's just doing memorized switch steps advances and patterns over and over and over. It isn't really fighting, using your eyes, like any top Thai fighter does. There is no solving, no thinking, no seeing. It's hold your breath and throw your pattern, move. Hold your breath, throw your pattern and move. This is just not "fighting" in my view.

3. Petchmorakot is not near his prime. I didn't know his career when he was at Lumpinee, but at 25-26 and with the way he fights not really an accomplished fighter at this point. I know ONE wants to hype him as such, but he's just an uncomplex Muay Khao fighter, with very simple attacks. ONE likes to feature and hype fighters. Fighting outside of his career prime, and outside of stadium rules and judging makes him un-extraordinary.

4. Ramazanov in that fight didn't even understand how to close his open side to a southpaw. This is really something any 10 year old in Thailand knows to do. It's basic Muay Thai. If he had simply checked the rear kick, Petchmorakot had nothing. The absence of even basic defense vs southpaw just points up to serious deficits.

5. There is no way that Ramaznov wins that fight in full Thai rules. You don't get "points" for throwing a lot (you actually will lose points for it). The announcers themselves didn't even seem to understand Muay Thai rules proper.

6. An exciting win for Ramaznov, to be sure. Something to be proud of.

7. I'll repeat. It's sad that hybrid-ish representations of "Muay Thai" such as ONE are becoming representations of what Muay Thai is. 

I say this as a Ramazanov fan. I love watching him vs other non-Thais. But what I see him doing isn't really "Muay Thai" to me, or vision guided fighting.

 

2 hours ago, AndyMaBobs said:

Those 1,2,3 kick type of drills, for me, only serve the purpose of getting the fighter comfortable with the movement and becoming defensively responsible.

I never want to put a coach in a position where they feel like they have to defend or justify their training methods. Sounds like you've come upon a great compromise in making things work with what is available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kevin von Duuglas-Ittu said:

A few things about that fight.

1. ONE calls what they put on "Muay Thai", but it isn't Muay Thai. It isn't reffed like Muay Thai, nor scored like Muay Thai. It is sad that it is becoming a layman's reference for what Muay Thai is, around the world. I say this well beyond this fight.

2. I like Ramazanov a lot, for a non-Thai. To be sure. But he's just doing memorized switch steps advances and patterns over and over and over. It isn't really fighting, using your eyes, like any top Thai fighter does. There is no solving, no thinking, no seeing. It's hold your breath and throw your pattern, move. Hold your breath, throw your pattern and move. This is just not "fighting" in my view.

3. Petchmorakot is not near his prime. I didn't know his career when he was at Lumpinee, but at 25-26 and with the way he fights not really an accomplished fighter at this point. I know ONE wants to hype him as such, but he's just an uncomplex Muay Khao fighter, with very simple attacks. ONE likes to feature and hype fighters. Fighting outside of his career prime, and outside of stadium rules and judging makes him un-extraordinary.

4. Ramazanov in that fight didn't even understand how to close his open side to a southpaw. This is really something any 10 year old in Thailand knows to do. It's basic Muay Thai. If he had simply checked the rear kick, Petchmorakot had nothing. The absence of even basic defense vs southpaw just points up to serious deficits.

5. There is no way that Ramaznov wins that fight in full Thai rules. You don't get "points" for throwing a lot (you actually will lose points for it). The announcers themselves didn't even seem to understand Muay Thai rules proper.

6. An exciting win for Ramaznov, to be sure. Something to be proud of.

7. I'll repeat. It's sad that hybrid-ish representations of "Muay Thai" such as ONE are becoming representations of what Muay Thai is. 

I say this as a Ramazanov fan. I love watching him vs other non-Thais. But what I see him doing isn't really "Muay Thai" to me, or vision guided fighting.

 

I never want to put a coach in a position where they feel like they have to defend or justify their training methods. Sounds like you've come upon a great compromise in making things work with what is available.

Either way you slice it, he won the fight, In regards to the pure act of the two men fighting each other, he won it.

 

I recommend you try that drill that I detailed at some point and see how you find it affects what openings you see and how it helps you improvise with your own sparring and training! Hopefully at some point I'll be in Thailand in the next couple years and we can try it out then! 🙂 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys all write in a super complicated way.

On drilling. Western boxers might drill, but if you go into a regular boxing gym in US or UK because you wanna be a fighter, you'll also get a trainer holding pads for you. 

Sorry to be a broken record, but this really isn't a minor point.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Oliver said:

You guys all write in a super complicated way.

On drilling. Western boxers might drill, but if you go into a regular boxing gym in US or UK because you wanna be a fighter, you'll also get a trainer holding pads for you. 

Sorry to be a broken record, but this really isn't a minor point.

 

Pad holding in Thailand is simulating sparring, pad holding in a US boxing gym is usually fluff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Oliver said:

Umnm.....who told you that?

2 People: 
Head coach of CBA, coached Cuban national team including silver medalists at the olympics.
Also the head coach of Johnny Tocco's boxing - which is one of the best amateur boxing gyms in the US. 
Two of the most qualified people I know in boxing.

Too much western padwork is fluffing the boxers ego thinking they've got the fast hands and reflexes - but isn't substantive. The best countries for boxing focus on drills over padwork - and it shows in the amateur scene. That's why Cuba dominates and America has degraded so badly. Too much focus on speedy padwork without practical application and athleticism, not enough on the building blocks that make a fighter.

This is substantive padwork. It has a clear goal and focus, it's not just training muscle memory.

It's very easy for padwork to turn into drilling a set combination + responses to the pad holders slaps, that only succeed in making you better at that drill - rather than better at fighting. The drill itself becomes the skill that's mastered instead of the drill serving to improve the skill of fighting.

I see it all the time - you get guys who look fierce on the pads, but when they get into sparring and fighting they aren't capable of anything more than rushing in swinging and trying to use athleticism to win. 

I'll leave it there for my moaning. 😛

Edited by AndyMaBobs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/13/2020 at 7:09 PM, AndyMaBobs said:

2 People: 
Head coach of CBA, coached Cuban national team including silver medalists at the olympics.
Also the head coach of Johnny Tocco's boxing - which is one of the best amateur boxing gyms in the US. 
Two of the most qualified people I know in boxing.

...Errr....these are people you *actually* know? As in *know* know? Or you heard it said by them on a podcast? Or you met them once at an event and queued for a selfie?

Sorry but something about this is setting off the bullshit radar. 

Cannot actually refute anything you've said or prove you wrong, that's the thing. Am not a western boxer, not an American, and never trained in an American gym. Can an American on this forum who has boxed please weigh in on this? Would be happy to be wrong, just need more convicing.

Oh yeah, and that thing you said about padholding in Thailand being 'simulated sparring'. Like...OK, kinda get what you think you mean when you say that...but....it's a very very curious way of describing it.

And those previous videos you posted of Russian guys training Muay Thai with that partner drill system you describe.... umm.... again...not trying to be an asshole here, but that isn't Muay Thai. Would rather suck a dick than train like that every day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Oliver said:

...Errr....these are people you *actually* know? As in *know* know? Or you heard it said by them on a podcast? Or you met them once at an event and queued for a selfie?

Sorry but something about this is setting off the bullshit radar. 

Cannot actually refute anything you've said or prove you wrong, that's the thing. Am not a western boxer, not an American, and never trained in an American gym. Can an American on this forum who has boxed please weigh in on this? Would be happy to be wrong, just need more convicing.

Oh yeah, and that thing you said about padholding in Thailand being 'simulated sparring'. Like...OK, kinda get what you think you mean when you say that...but....it's a very very curious way of describing it.

And those previous videos you posted of Russian guys training Muay Thai with that partner drill system you describe.... umm.... again...not trying to be an asshole here, but that isn't Muay Thai. Would rather suck a dick than train like that every day.

Yup, know know. Thought it wouldn't make a difference either way.

You can go to Levantar Athletics on YouTube to see the training at Toccos (I know their head coach quite well) and I've taken lessons from the head coach at CBA. 

It's not a curious way of describing it - it's just how they approach pad work. I won't assume to know your experience, but if you've ever had a thai trainer hold pads for you, or trained in Thailand, you will see what I mean.

As I said tho, I'll leave it there because this info and perspectives are easily available.

Edited by AndyMaBobs
  • Gamma 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AndyMaBobs said:

It's not a curious way of describing it - it's just how they approach pad work. I won't assume to know your experience, but if you've ever had a thai trainer hold pads for you, or trained in Thailand, you will see what I mean.

I really hesitate to jump in here because you and I have very different frames of reference, and a great deal of what you assert just doesn't jib with what I know and experience, but I might as well give it a try... this just isn't what padwork is, or is for in Thailand. Yes, gyms that handle a lot of westerns do start molding padwork as a kind of simulated fighting...because they are westerners, and they often lack basic rhythm or responses...and, importantly, westerners like it. But this just isn't what padwork is for in the building of Thai fighters. Padwork, originally, was designed to "charge the battery" (as Kaensak put it) leading  up to a fight. It's pounding out fighting shapes, building endurance and explosiveness. It isn't really a "teaching" mechanism. It's kind of become one for westerners, because gyms are changing, but this isn't what it really is for. Thais don't need to "simulate sparring", well, because they spar.  If there are any teaching, or leading aspects of padwork, traditionally, maybe for developing fighters its about rhythm, posture, constancy, spacing, in the exercise of power and endurance. No, padwork really isn't "simulated sparring", at least in the core of it.

Westerners do experience this "simulated fight" quality in Thailand, and then bring it back to their gym and mark it as "very Thai". And, I do think that for westerners who do need a lot of developmental experiences, it's a very good thing to try and bring out the "fight" energy in their Thai trainer, who usually is an ex-fighter and probably pretty bored with their endless rounds. Its a very good thing. It's more fun, etc. But no, that isn't really the purpose of padwork, classically.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Kevin von Duuglas-Ittu said:

I really hesitate to jump in here because you and I have very different frames of reference, and a great deal of what you assert just doesn't jib with what I know and experience, but I might as well give it a try... this just isn't what padwork is, or is for in Thailand. Yes, gyms that handle a lot of westerns do start molding padwork as a kind of simulated fighting...because they are westerners, and often lack basic rhythm or responses...and, westerners like it. But this just isn't what padwork is for in the building of Thai fighters. Padwork, originally, was designed to "charge the battery" (as Kaensak put it) leading  up to a fight. It's pounding out fighting shapes, building endurance and explosiveness. It isn't really a "teaching" mechanism. It's kind of become one for westerners, because gyms are changing, but this isn't what it really is for. Thais don't need to "simulate sparring", well, because they spar.  If there are any teaching, or leading aspects of padwork, traditionally, maybe for developing fighters its about rhythm, posture, constancy, spacing, in the exercise of power and endurance. No, padwork really isn't "simulated sparring", at least in the core of it.

Westerners do experience this "simulated fight" quality in Thailand, and then bring it back to their gym and mark it as "very Thai". And, I do think that for westerners who do need a lot of developmental experiences, it's a very good thing to try and bring out the "fight" energy in their Thai trainer, who usually is an ex-fighter and probably pretty bored with their endless rounds. Its a very good thing. It's more fun, etc. But no, that isn't really the purpose of padwork, classically.

I think it's terminology or the way I articulate something vs how you would, because I agree with what you're saying. 

The way I was taught my padwork by my coach (he's a Thai fella) is very different from how other westerners were. It's not simulated sparring in the core of it sure, but compare Thai padwork to some of the mindless padwork you'll see in Western gyms and I think you'll see what I mean.

Padwork in a US Thai gym (and sadly a lot of the UK) is just glorified cardio boxing. 

 

It's harder to articulate what I mean because it's not a live conversation here its a forum - so less context

 

This resembles a fight much more than what I see done in the UK. 

When you've got pro fighters it gets better (in regards to muay thai at least)

Edited by AndyMaBobs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Oliver said:

umm.... again...not trying to be an asshole here, but that isn't Muay Thai. Would rather suck a dick than train like that every day.

Really, let's be chill on the language/intensity. I agree, I have to shake my head at that training stuff, but we want to keep the forum super friendly. So many places on the internet are really uncool. And yeah, people have different approaches.

  • Like 1
  • Super Slick 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Kevin von Duuglas-Ittu said:

Really, let's be chill on the language/intensity. I agree, I have to shake my head at that training stuff, but we want to keep the forum super friendly. So many places on the internet are really uncool. And yeah, people have different approaches.

It made him a formidable fighter in his own right, regardless of our own takes on it. 🙂 

Cheers for keeping it friendly! Even if we may not agree

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/9/2020 at 11:43 PM, Snack Payback said:

That's great you got to train at JWP's gym. He comes across as a really sound fella 👍

He really is.. his wife is great too. 
Both badass and both very friendly with no ego 🙏🏼

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Kevin von Duuglas-Ittu said:

Really, let's be chill on the language/intensity. I agree, I have to shake my head at that training stuff, but we want to keep the forum super friendly. So many places on the internet are really uncool. And yeah, people have different approaches.

Yeah that's fair. Sorry for the language, wasn't trying to be gross.

The 'simulated sparring' description of Thailand's pad holding.... Urrghhh.... it's like...we know what Andy is getting at at, but that phrase doesn't mean quite what he intended, was just a language slip up. (See, am being all nice now). What he means is probably that the trainer throws kicks back at you, and you gotta block and kick back. Or he'll slap you in the face with the Thai pad if you being lazy and drop your guard. Whereas if you're hitting a heavy bag, you don't get those live responses. Like, OK fine. 

But.... it doesn't feel like sparring when you're doing it. At the end of a round of sparring with your training partner, you're not made to smash 20  (or more) hard body kicks with each leg, then get down for press-ups before the resting for the next round.

Have met Europeans that bitch and trash talk (wait...can I say 'bitch' for 'complaining?) about Thailand's pad holding. They're like, "Ohhh....all I get to do every day is do jab, cross, body kick, & jab right cross, right elbow, & jab, body kick, knee....its just the same thing over and over again".

You look at them like.... errr.....YEAH mofo (see..didn't spell it out....) that's what it is.... that's what you signed up for!

Peace and love to you all by the way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Oliver said:

Have met Europeans that bitch and trash talk (wait...can I say 'bitch' for 'complaining?)...
You look at them like.... errr.....YEAH mofo (see..didn't spell it out....)

I know you are being cheeky, but just to be clear, it isn't actually the adult language, it's the part that begins....

6 hours ago, Oliver said:

umm.... again...not trying to be an asshole here...

Usually, anything that begins "not trying to be an asshole" and then follows with profanity, well...you know, is lacking in tone. I'm just trying to keep it all cool. If you want to cuss, curse, bust out all kinds of language in a friendly way, go for it. Sylvie and I are pretty sailormouth when it comes to enthusiasm.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kevin von Duuglas-Ittu said:

Usually, anything that begins "not trying to be an asshole" and then follows with profanity, well...you know, is lacking in tone. I'm just trying to keep it all cool.

Copy that

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 4/4/2020 at 1:29 PM, Sylvie von Duuglas-Ittu said:

I think this is especially tricky because of the complete disparity between importance and commonality of fighting between Thai gyms and western gyms. In the argument about grading systems in western gyms, which is a way to retain members and give people who aren't fighters a sense of accomplishment and progress, these methods are in place because gyms are not mainly fighter's gyms. Most members are there for fitness or passion, but most won't fight. There are "fight teams" within the gyms and the more fighters you have the  more "authentic" you are, I guess. But in Thailand, a grading system would be ridiculous. You walk into a gym and just watch people and you know what "level" they are in experience. Fighters definitely have importance for financial reasons and giving "face" and esteem to the gym name, which is true in the West as well but to a very, very different degree. I'm not sure how that kind of "authenticity" could translate into such a different system in the West, with such different business models, customer breakdowns, opportunities, and most importantly a broad disparity in experience between Thai trainers/gyms and those anywhere else in the world.

Totally agree with your points. It seems that Western MT gyms having to compete with other Martial Arts that provided belts to show seniority/experience level (not to mention to make money and massage the ego) had to follow the "Martial Arts School" model. What's also interesting is that the guy who introduced the MT band grading system was a Thai immigrant to California Chai Sirisute, the founder of the World Thai Boxing Association. Sirisute claims to be the first to actively teach MT in the US in 1968. I'm guessing he surveyed the landscape and realized every other martial art awarded a belt or other symbol to signify rank and decided to copy them to be competitive. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an impression, though it is only an impression that western should be read as 'american' for most of these threads, because things like belts in Muay Thai isn't something I've encountered at all in Britain or Europe - that's not to say that it doesn't exist in some mcdojo-ish setting but a fair degree of what I've been reading in this thread overall seems to be a question of muay thai's authenticity in America, rather than the west.

I have my gripes with how muay thai is trained in the UK with silly padwork approaches that can't be replicated in a fight over proper drilling/sparring - but I've never encountered things like belts and gradings like what you've just described. I imagine that Sken probably used some sort of thing when he first started teaching 'Thaikwondo' over here - but shit like that seems to have been weaseled out if it was ever a thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • The BwO and the Muay Thai Fighter As Westerners and others seek to trace out the "system" of Muay Thai, bio-mechanically copying movements or techniques, organizing it for transmission and export, being taught by those further and further from the culture that generated it, what is missed are the ways in which the Thai Muay Thai fighter becomes like an egg, a philosophical egg, harboring a potential that cannot be traced. At least, one could pose this notion as an extreme aspect of the Thai fighting arts as they stand juxtaposed to their various systemizations and borrowings. D&G's Body Without Organs concept speculatively helps open this interpretation. Just leaving this here for further study and perhaps comment.   from: https://weaponizedjoy.blogspot.com/2023/01/deleuzes-body-without-organs-gentle.html Artaud is usually cited as the source of this idea - and he is, mostly (more on that in the appendix) - but, to my mind, the more interesting (and clarifying) reference is to Raymond Ruyer, from whom Deleuze and Guattari borrow the thematics of the egg. Consider the following passage by Ruyer, speaking on embryogenesis, and certain experiments carried out on embryos: "In contrast to the irreversibly differentiated organs of the adult... In the egg or the embryo, which is at first totally equipotential ... the determination [development of the embryo -WJ] distributes this equipotentiality into more limited territories, which develop from then on with relative autonomy ... [In embryogenesis], the gradients of the chemical substance provide the general pattern [of development]. Depending on the local level of concentration [of chemicals], the genes that are triggered at different thresholds engender this or that organ. When the experimenter cuts a T. gastrula in half along the sagittal plane, the gradient regulates itself at first like electricity in a capacitor. Then the affected genes generate, according to new thresholds, other organs than those they would have produced, with a similar overall form but different dimensions" (Neofinalism, p.57,64). The language of 'gradients' and 'thresholds' (which characterize the BwO for D&G) is taken more or less word for word from Ruyer here. D&G's 'spin' on the issue, however, is to, in a certain way, ontologize and 'ethicize' this notion. In their hands, equipotentiality becomes a practice, one which is not always conscious, and which is always in some way being undergone whether we recognize it or not: "[The BwO] is not at all a notion or a concept but a practice, a set of practices. You never reach the Body without Organs, you can't reach it, you are forever attaining it, it is a limit" (ATP150). You can think of it as a practice of 'equipotentializing', of (an ongoing) reclaiming of the body from any fixed or settled form of organization: "The BwO is opposed not to the organs but to that organization of the organs called the organism" (ATP158). Importantly, by transforming the BwO into a practice, D&G also transform the temporality of the BwO. Although the image of the egg is clarifying, it can also be misleading insofar as an egg is usually thought of as preceding a fully articulated body. Thus, one imagines an egg as something 'undifferentiated', which then progressively (over time) differentiates itself into organs. However, for D&G, this is not the right way to approach the BwO. Instead, the BwO are, as they say, "perfectly contemporary, you always carry it with you as your own milieu of experimentation" (ATP164). The BwO is not something that 'precedes' differentiation, but operates alongside it: a potential (or equipotential ethics) that is always available for the making: "It [the BwO] is not the child "before" the adult, or the mother "before" the child: it is the strict contemporaneousness of the adult, of the adult and the child". Hence finally why they insist that the BwO is not something 'undifferentiated', but rather, that in which "things and organs are distinguished solely by gradients, migrations, zones of proximity." (ATP164)
    • The Labor Shortage in Muay Thai As the Thai government is pushing to centralize Muay Thai as a Soft Power feature of tourism, and as Thai kaimuay become rarer and rarer, pushed out by big gyms (scooping up talent, and social demographic changes), there is a labor shortage for all the fights everyone wants to put on. There are two big sources to try and tap. There are all the tourists who can come and fight on Tourism Muay Thai (Entertainment) shows, and there are the provinces. The farang labor issue is taken care of by rule changes and Soft Power investment, but how do the provinces get squeezed in? Well, ONE Lumpinee is headed to the provinces, trying to build that labor stream into its economic model, and cut off the traditional paths from provincial fighting to Bangkok trad stadium fighting, and top BKK trad promoters are focusing more on provincial cards. There is a battle over who can stock their fight cards. ONE needs Thais to come and learn their hyper-aggressive swing hard and get knocked out sport, mostly to lose to non-Thais to grow the sport's name that way, fighting the tourists and adventure tourists, and the trad promoters need to keep the talent growing along traditional cultural lines. As long as the government does not invest in the actual ecosystem of provincial Muay Thai (which doesn't involve doing money handouts, that does not help the ecosystem), the labor stream of fighters will continue to shrink. Which means there is going to be a Rajadamnern vs Lumpinee battle over that diminishing resource. The logical step is for the government to step in and nurture the provincial ecosystem in a wholistic way, increasing the conditions of the seeding, small kaimuay that were once the great fountain for the larger regional scenes and kaimuay. headsup credit to Egokind on Twitter for the graphics. "You can get rich!!!!!!" (paraphrase)                  
    • The Three Great Maledictions on Desire I've studied Deleuze and Guattari for many years now, but this lecture on the Body Without Organs is really one of the the most clarifying, especially because he leaves the terminology behind, or rather shifts playfully and experimentally between terms, letting the light shine through. This is related to the continuity within High level traditional Muay Thai, and the avoidance of the culminating knock-out moment, the skating through, the ease and persistence. (You would need a background in Philosophy, and probably this particular Continental thought to get something more out of this.)   And we saw on previous occasions that the three great betrayals, the three maledictions on desire are: to relate desire to lack; to relate desire to pleasure, or to the orgasm – see [Wilhelm] Reich, fatal error; or to relate desire to enjoyment [jouissance]. The three theses are connected. To put lack into desire is to completely misrecognize the process. Once you have put lack into desire, you will only be able to measure the apparent fulfilments of desire with pleasure. Therefore, the reference to pleasure follows directly from desire-lack; and you can only relate it to a transcendence which is that of impossible enjoyment referring to castration and the split subject. That is to say that these three propositions form the same soiling of desire, the same way of cursing desire. On the other hand, desire and the body without organs at the limit are the same thing, for the simple reason that the body without organs is the plane of consistency, the field of immanence of desire taken as process. This plane of consistency is beaten back down, prevented from functioning by the strata. Hence terminologically, I oppose – but once again if you can find better words, I’m not attached to these –, I oppose plane of consistency and the strata which precisely prevent desire from discovering its plane of consistency, and which will proceed to orient desire around lack, pleasure, and enjoyment, that is to say, they will form the repressive mystification of desire. So, if I continue to spread everything out on the same plane, I say let’s look for examples where desire does indeed appear as a process unfolding itself on the body without organs taken as field of immanence or of consistency of desire. And here we could place the ancient Chinese warrior; and again, it is we Westerners who interpret the sexual practices of the ancient Chinese and Taoist Chinese, in any case, as a delay of enjoyment. You have to be a filthy European to understand Taoist techniques like that. It is, on the contrary, the extraction of desire from its pseudo-finality of pleasure in order to discover the immanence proper to desire in its belonging to a field of consistency. It is not at all to delay enjoyment.   This is not unrelated to the Cowardice of the Knockout piece I wrote:  
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

    • In my experience, 1 pair of gloves is fine (14oz in my case, so I can spar safely), just air them out between training (bag gloves definitely not necessary). Shinguards are a good idea, though gyms will always have them and lend them out- just more hygienic to have your own.  2 pairs of wraps, 2 shorts (I like the lightweight Raja ones for the heat), 1 pair of good road running trainers. Good gumshield and groin-protector, naturally. Every time I finish training, I bring everything into the shower (not gloves or shinnies, obviously) with me to clean off the (bucketsfull in my case) of sweat, but things dry off quickly here outside of the monsoon season.  One thing I have found I like is smallish, cotton briefs for training (less cloth, therefore sweaty wetness than boxers, etc.- bring underwear from home- decent, cotton stuff is strangely expensive here). Don't weigh yourself down too much. You might want to buy shorts or vests from the gym(s) as (useful) souvenirs. I recommend Action Zone and Keelapan, next door, in Bangkok (good selection and prices):  https://www.google.com/maps/place/Action+Zone/@13.7474264,100.5206774,17z/data=!4m14!1m7!3m6!1s0x30e29931ee397e41:0x4c8f06926c37408b!2sAction+Zone!8m2!3d13.7474212!4d100.5232523!16s%2Fg%2F1hm3_f5d2!3m5!1s0x30e29931ee397e41:0x4c8f06926c37408b!8m2!3d13.7474212!4d100.5232523!16s%2Fg%2F1hm3_f5d2?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI0MTAyOS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
    • Hey! I totally get what you mean about pushing through—it can sometimes backfire, especially with mood swings and fatigue. Regarding repeated head blows and depression, there’s research showing a link, especially with conditions like CTE (Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy). More athletes are recognizing the importance of mental health alongside training. 
    • If you need a chill video editing app for Windows, check out Movavi Video Editor. It's super easy to use, perfect for beginners. You can cut, merge, and add effects without feeling lost. They’ve got loads of tutorials to help you out! I found some dope tips on clipping videos with Movavi. It lets you quickly cut parts of your video, so you can make your edits just how you want. Hit up their site to learn more about how to clip your screen on Windows and see how it all works.
    • Hi all, I am fortunate enough to have the opportunity to be traveling to Thailand soon for just over a month of traveling and training. I am a complete beginner and do not own any training gear. One of the first stops on my trip will be to explore Bangkok and purchase equipment. What should be on my list? Clearly, gloves, wraps, shorts and mouthguard are required. I would be grateful for some more insight e.g. should I buy bag gloves and sparring gloves, whether shin pads are worthwhile for a beginner, etc. I'm partiularly conscious of the heat and humidity, it would make sense to pack two pairs of running shoes, two sets of gloves, several handwraps and lots of shorts. Any nuggets of wisdom are most welcome. Thanks in advance for your contributions!   
    • Have you looked at venum elite 
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.4k
    • Total Posts
      11.2k
×
×
  • Create New...