Jump to content

Muay Tae (kicker) style


Recommended Posts

Hello all. I’ve recently joined the Muay Thai Library and am simply amazed at both the quality and quantity of knowledge provided. This is truly a beautiful project! One of my favorite parts is the insight you all provide on the different fighting styles within Muay Thai. I’ve noticed that there is a quite a bit of content on Muay Matt, Muay Khao, and Muay Femur archetypes but not a lot on the Muay Tae style (apart from Singdam and Kaensak) so I was just hoping to spark a bit of discussion about this lesser mentioned style. First a question:

Is the kicker archetype it’s own style or is just a sort of offshoot of the Muay Femur style? Or maybe a bit of both? For example, there are some guys like the two mentioned above and Sam-A who utilize a more defensive style, staying at range and scoring with round kicks and teeps; then there are guys like Yodsanklai and Samkor who just smash you into oblivion with a barrage of power left kicks. Would this all fall under the Muay Tae umbrella or would the former group of fighters be consider Femur? 
 

Who are your favorite kickers in the history of Muay Thai? I’m fond of Yodsanklai, hoping he’ll bounce back from his loss last weekend and I really like Apidej Sit-Hirun, his style was so efficient and effective, just good fundamentals and insanely powerful round kicks!
 

Very excited to hear you all’s input on this style and to be a member of this awesome community! 

  • Nak Muay 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, marxp44 said:

I’ve noticed that there is a quite a bit of content on Muay Matt, Muay Khao, and Muay Femur archetypes but not a lot on the Muay Tae style (apart from Singdam and Kaensak

The one to watch is Silapathai, maybe the best Muay Tae fighter ever: https://www.patreon.com/posts/21484000

Also Boonlai was a hell of a kicking fighter: https://www.patreon.com/posts/25122414

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, marxp44 said:

Is the kicker archetype it’s own style or is just a sort of offshoot of the Muay Femur style? Or maybe a bit of both? For example, there are some guys like the two mentioned above and Sam-A who utilize a more defensive style, staying at range and scoring with round kicks and teeps; then there are guys like Yodsanklai and Samkor who just smash you into oblivion with a barrage of power left kicks. Would this all fall under the Muay Tae umbrella or would the former group of fighters be consider Femur? 

You kind of tend to have two kinds of kickers, if you want to be really generalized. You have southpaw kickers who tend to have big, thunderous kicks (because their kick goes right into the power side of the orthodox fighter), like Yodsanklai and Samkor that you mention, and then you have orthodox fighters who are really more Muay Femeu, artful in scoring points and taking angles. Silapathai was unearthly in this. Check out his fight versus Karuhat were Karuhat, one of the most Muay Femeu fighters ever elected to kick with him:

 

Very few fighters ever could out kick Karuhat.

It's best to keep in mind that these "styles" are all just descriptors. If you said someone was Muay Tae, it isn't some kind of club he belongs to, you're mostly just saying "that guy kicks a lot". It's not purely that, but we tend to make a bigger deal of these style types than Thais do. Most kickers of the Golden Age though would consider themselves Muay Femeu. Femeu fighting just means "skilled" and "artful", something pretty much any fighter wouldn't mind being said about themselves. The torso kick was the most dependable highest scoring strike in Muay Thai, so the "art" of the kick was using it repeatedly to just rack up the points and demonstrate your control over the space.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Kevin von Duuglas-Ittu said:

The one to watch is Silapathai, maybe the best Muay Tae fighter ever: https://www.patreon.com/posts/21484000

Also Boonlai was a hell of a kicking fighter: https://www.patreon.com/posts/25122414

Thank you for the suggestions! I hadn’t seen either of those yet and based off of this Silapathai highlight I’m watching, it’s exactly the style I’m looking for. Thank you so much! 

  • Respect 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That makes a lot of sense, thanks for clearing that up. I guess the style distinctions should be more of a description than a prescription, like fighters have so many subtleties to their style that no one is ever really just one style. I really like that about Muay Thai, there are such high levels of artistry present.

  • Nak Muay 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, marxp44 said:

That makes a lot of sense, thanks for clearing that up. I guess the style distinctions should be more of a description than a prescription, like fighters have so many subtleties to their style that no one is ever really just one style

Really well said. This was really even much more the case in the Golden Age because fighters could do everything. There were very few successful one-dimensional fighters. These days you get much more singular fighting dimensions, it seems. Back in the day all the top fighters had all the skills. You couldn't just take their weapon away and win. I can never get out of my head the fight between Boonlai (a kicker) and Somrak (a few years before he won Gold as an Olympic boxer). Somrak wins without throwing a single meaningful punch (maybe not even a single punch, I can't recall). It's pretty amazing:

But so many of the top fighters had just capacities across styles. Chamuekphet was a relentless knee fighter, but could kick with anyone. Weeapol had very heavy hands, but could kick with everyone.

  • Like 1
  • Super Slick 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were killers in the Golden Age for sure, everyone just had a swagger and unique style about them. Thank you for these fights as well, they’re gonna be a great resource for study. I’m looking to implement a little bit of those Golden Age tactics into my MMA game so this Library and these discussions are truly a godsend! 

  • Gamma 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember a video of Sylvie talking to someone she took a lesson with (I don't remember who it was) while preparing for a fight and told him that she'd be fighting an opponent who prefers to... I forgot what. He didn't know yet that Sylvie was a Muay Khao style fighter but when he heard what kind of opponent she would be facing he was like "ah, then you just need to be Muay Khao!" as in "If that's the kind of opponent you're fighting, just adopt a Muay Khao style for this fight!".

Serves to show that Thais can be kind of flexible with styles.

  • Nak Muay 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/23/2019 at 1:46 AM, marxp44 said:

Who are your favorite kickers in the history of Muay Thai? 

Some great names already mentioned above. I'd like to add Nokweed Davy, who had an absolute sledgehammer of a kick

Nokweed.gif.8c7bdd8a3cd8878b5d6f35b4d9173e34.gif
 

 

And Chatchai Paiseetong for his sublime head kicks

Chatchai.gif.ce9f498c29149714d731d5fbedac437a.gif

  • Gamma 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
On 11/25/2019 at 3:01 PM, Xestaro said:

Serves to show that Thais can be kind of flexible with styles.

This is definitely true. Ideally, the supreme fighters, could move between styles. Fighters like Namkabuan and Namsaknoi for instance would fight a kind of femeu semi-aggressive style, and then go full Muay Khao in the 4th to lock fights away. Chumuakpet was definitely a Muay Khao fighter, one of the greatest, but when he fought a large Muay Khao fighter like Sangtiennoi, he fought almost all the scoring part of the fight backwards, in a femeu style. Other fighters of course really became locked into their style. Someone like Samson Isaan couldn't see himself dancing away in a fight. I remember him making fun of Karuhat saying that the femeu fighter was just flouncing about, and waving their hand "bye, bye" "bye, bye".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • Karuhat leaves our house after another PRP treatment this afternoon, a big American seminar tour in Feb. I have trepidation that he literally could be an accidental target for ICE and other anti-foreigner tactics. Going to my home country and maybe at risk. 
    • Many are curious or questioning why I’ve become so focused on fighters of the Golden Age, if it might be some form of nostalgia, or a romance of exoticism for what is not now. Truthfully, it is just that of the draw of a mystery, the abiding sense of: How did they do that?, something that built up in me over many years, a mystery increasing over the now hundreds of hours I’ve spent in the presence of Golden Age fighters - both major and minor. Originally it came from just standing in the ring with them, often filming close at hand, and getting that practically synaptic, embodied sense that this is just so different, the feeling you can only get first hand - especially in comparison. You can see it on video, and it is apparent, but when you feel it its just on another order, an order of true mystery. When something moves through the space in a new or alter way it reverberates in you. How is it that these men, really men from a generation or two, move like this. It’s acute in someone like Karuhat, or Wangchannoi, or Hippy, but it is also present in much lessor names you will never know. It’s in all of them, as if its in the water of their Time. I’ve interviewed and broken down all the possible sources of this. It seems pretty clear that it did not come to them out of some form of instruction. It was not dictated or explicitly shown, explained (so when coaches today do these today they are not touching on that vein). It does not seem sufficient to think that it came from just a very wide talent pool, the sheer number of young fighters that were dispersed throughout the country in the 1980s, as if sheer natural selection pulled those movements and skills out. It did not come from sheerly training hard - some notable greats did not train particularly hard, at least by reputation. It’s not coached, its not trained, its not numerical. A true mystery. Fighters would come from the provinces with a fairly substantial number of fights, but at a skill level which they would say isn’t very strong, and within only a few years be creating symphonies in the ring. Karuhat was 16 when he fought his first fight (with zero training) and by 19 was one of the best fighters who ever lived. Sirimongkol accidentally killed an opponent in the provinces (I would guess a medical issue for the opponent, a common strike) and was pulled down to Bangkok because of this sudden "killer" reputation, but he’d tell you that he was completely unskilled and of little experience. Within a few years he was among the very best of his generation. We asked him: Who trained you, who taught you?, expecting some insight into a lineage of knowledge and he told us “Nobody. I learned from watching others.” This runs so hard against the primary Western assumptions of how Knowledge is kept, recorded and passed, but it is a story we heard over and over. Somehow these men, both famous and not, developed keen, beautiful (very precise) movement and acute combat potency without direct transmission or even significant instructional training. The answer could be located nowhere…in no particular place or function. Sherlock Holmes said of a mystery: Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.. All these things that we anticipate make great fighters, these really seem to be the impossible here. They were not the keys, it seems. Instead it appears that it was in the very weave of the culture, and the subcultures of Muay Thai, within the structures of the kaimuay experiences, in the richly embedded knowledges of everyone in the game, in the states of relaxation of the aesthetics of muay itself, in the practices of play, in the weft of festival fighting, the warp of equipmentless training, in endurance, in the quixotic powers of gambling, the Mother’s Milk of Muay Thai itself, which is a very odd but beautiful thing to conclude. It does pose something of a nostalgia, because many of these cultural and circumstantial elements have changed - some radically altered by a certain modernity, some shifted subtly - so there is a dimension of feeling that we want not to lose all of it, that we might still pull some substantial threads forward into our own future, some of that cultural DNA that made some of the greatest fighters ever what they were. It's not a hope to return to those past states, but a respect for what they (mysteriously) created. As we approximate techniques, copy movements, mechanize styles, coach harder and harder, these are all the things that make up a net through which everything slips out. Instead, this mystery, the how did they become so great, so proficient, so perceptive, so smooth, so electric, so knowing, stands before us, something of a challenge to our own age and time.
    • I guess you're in the UK?  If so, do college.  At your age it's free.  As for after college, do what youth allows.  Have a go at fighting.   You pay for uni whatever age you are.  Nothing wrong in doing something in uni in your mid -20's+.  I did a second degree in my 30's.  I would not have been held back by a career as a fighter earlier on.  As you get older, you begin to regret the things that you didn't do, far more than the things that you did.     Good luck in your fight career!
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.4k
    • Total Posts
      11.6k
×
×
  • Create New...