Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello all. I’ve recently joined the Muay Thai Library and am simply amazed at both the quality and quantity of knowledge provided. This is truly a beautiful project! One of my favorite parts is the insight you all provide on the different fighting styles within Muay Thai. I’ve noticed that there is a quite a bit of content on Muay Matt, Muay Khao, and Muay Femur archetypes but not a lot on the Muay Tae style (apart from Singdam and Kaensak) so I was just hoping to spark a bit of discussion about this lesser mentioned style. First a question:

Is the kicker archetype it’s own style or is just a sort of offshoot of the Muay Femur style? Or maybe a bit of both? For example, there are some guys like the two mentioned above and Sam-A who utilize a more defensive style, staying at range and scoring with round kicks and teeps; then there are guys like Yodsanklai and Samkor who just smash you into oblivion with a barrage of power left kicks. Would this all fall under the Muay Tae umbrella or would the former group of fighters be consider Femur? 
 

Who are your favorite kickers in the history of Muay Thai? I’m fond of Yodsanklai, hoping he’ll bounce back from his loss last weekend and I really like Apidej Sit-Hirun, his style was so efficient and effective, just good fundamentals and insanely powerful round kicks!
 

Very excited to hear you all’s input on this style and to be a member of this awesome community! 

  • Nak Muay 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, marxp44 said:

I’ve noticed that there is a quite a bit of content on Muay Matt, Muay Khao, and Muay Femur archetypes but not a lot on the Muay Tae style (apart from Singdam and Kaensak

The one to watch is Silapathai, maybe the best Muay Tae fighter ever: https://www.patreon.com/posts/21484000

Also Boonlai was a hell of a kicking fighter: https://www.patreon.com/posts/25122414

  • Like 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, marxp44 said:

Is the kicker archetype it’s own style or is just a sort of offshoot of the Muay Femur style? Or maybe a bit of both? For example, there are some guys like the two mentioned above and Sam-A who utilize a more defensive style, staying at range and scoring with round kicks and teeps; then there are guys like Yodsanklai and Samkor who just smash you into oblivion with a barrage of power left kicks. Would this all fall under the Muay Tae umbrella or would the former group of fighters be consider Femur? 

You kind of tend to have two kinds of kickers, if you want to be really generalized. You have southpaw kickers who tend to have big, thunderous kicks (because their kick goes right into the power side of the orthodox fighter), like Yodsanklai and Samkor that you mention, and then you have orthodox fighters who are really more Muay Femeu, artful in scoring points and taking angles. Silapathai was unearthly in this. Check out his fight versus Karuhat were Karuhat, one of the most Muay Femeu fighters ever elected to kick with him:

 

Very few fighters ever could out kick Karuhat.

It's best to keep in mind that these "styles" are all just descriptors. If you said someone was Muay Tae, it isn't some kind of club he belongs to, you're mostly just saying "that guy kicks a lot". It's not purely that, but we tend to make a bigger deal of these style types than Thais do. Most kickers of the Golden Age though would consider themselves Muay Femeu. Femeu fighting just means "skilled" and "artful", something pretty much any fighter wouldn't mind being said about themselves. The torso kick was the most dependable highest scoring strike in Muay Thai, so the "art" of the kick was using it repeatedly to just rack up the points and demonstrate your control over the space.

  • Like 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, Kevin von Duuglas-Ittu said:

The one to watch is Silapathai, maybe the best Muay Tae fighter ever: https://www.patreon.com/posts/21484000

Also Boonlai was a hell of a kicking fighter: https://www.patreon.com/posts/25122414

Thank you for the suggestions! I hadn’t seen either of those yet and based off of this Silapathai highlight I’m watching, it’s exactly the style I’m looking for. Thank you so much! 

  • Respect 1
Posted

That makes a lot of sense, thanks for clearing that up. I guess the style distinctions should be more of a description than a prescription, like fighters have so many subtleties to their style that no one is ever really just one style. I really like that about Muay Thai, there are such high levels of artistry present.

  • Nak Muay 1
Posted
1 minute ago, marxp44 said:

That makes a lot of sense, thanks for clearing that up. I guess the style distinctions should be more of a description than a prescription, like fighters have so many subtleties to their style that no one is ever really just one style

Really well said. This was really even much more the case in the Golden Age because fighters could do everything. There were very few successful one-dimensional fighters. These days you get much more singular fighting dimensions, it seems. Back in the day all the top fighters had all the skills. You couldn't just take their weapon away and win. I can never get out of my head the fight between Boonlai (a kicker) and Somrak (a few years before he won Gold as an Olympic boxer). Somrak wins without throwing a single meaningful punch (maybe not even a single punch, I can't recall). It's pretty amazing:

But so many of the top fighters had just capacities across styles. Chamuekphet was a relentless knee fighter, but could kick with anyone. Weeapol had very heavy hands, but could kick with everyone.

  • Like 1
  • Super Slick 1
Posted

They were killers in the Golden Age for sure, everyone just had a swagger and unique style about them. Thank you for these fights as well, they’re gonna be a great resource for study. I’m looking to implement a little bit of those Golden Age tactics into my MMA game so this Library and these discussions are truly a godsend! 

  • Gamma 1
Posted

I remember a video of Sylvie talking to someone she took a lesson with (I don't remember who it was) while preparing for a fight and told him that she'd be fighting an opponent who prefers to... I forgot what. He didn't know yet that Sylvie was a Muay Khao style fighter but when he heard what kind of opponent she would be facing he was like "ah, then you just need to be Muay Khao!" as in "If that's the kind of opponent you're fighting, just adopt a Muay Khao style for this fight!".

Serves to show that Thais can be kind of flexible with styles.

  • Nak Muay 1
Posted
On 11/23/2019 at 1:46 AM, marxp44 said:

Who are your favorite kickers in the history of Muay Thai? 

Some great names already mentioned above. I'd like to add Nokweed Davy, who had an absolute sledgehammer of a kick

Nokweed.gif.8c7bdd8a3cd8878b5d6f35b4d9173e34.gif
 

 

And Chatchai Paiseetong for his sublime head kicks

Chatchai.gif.ce9f498c29149714d731d5fbedac437a.gif

  • Gamma 1
  • 4 months later...
Posted
On 11/25/2019 at 3:01 PM, Xestaro said:

Serves to show that Thais can be kind of flexible with styles.

This is definitely true. Ideally, the supreme fighters, could move between styles. Fighters like Namkabuan and Namsaknoi for instance would fight a kind of femeu semi-aggressive style, and then go full Muay Khao in the 4th to lock fights away. Chumuakpet was definitely a Muay Khao fighter, one of the greatest, but when he fought a large Muay Khao fighter like Sangtiennoi, he fought almost all the scoring part of the fight backwards, in a femeu style. Other fighters of course really became locked into their style. Someone like Samson Isaan couldn't see himself dancing away in a fight. I remember him making fun of Karuhat saying that the femeu fighter was just flouncing about, and waving their hand "bye, bye" "bye, bye".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • Your comments here remind me of two authors in particular.  The first, Walter Benjamin, who wrote Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction in around 1920, and William S Burroughs.  Both were concerned with the ability of modern modes of production of profit increasing quantity, with a corresponding collapse in quality.     The intersection of traditional art and contemporary media consumption is not new.  We still have art galleries, museums and opera.  We still even have cheese rolling, dwile flonking and the Atherstone Ball Game in the UK.  Let's hope there are enough lovers of true Muay Thai to support it at festival level, certainly these traditional forms can be promoted, there are numerous examples of art forms which have promoted their pure selves.  One example is playhouses live broadcasting to cinemas.  The old art form utilises the newer to its benefit.   I certainly intend to travel to Chenjigou to train the martial art that the Chen family have taught there since the 1640's.  I intend to travel to Thailand for similar reasons.  
    • Whatever one's position on the future of Thailand's Muay Thai, its hard to deny that many of the arguments for the unstoppable - but sometimes delayed - "evolution" of the sport, it's imagined "potential" being reached through globalization and hoped-for mass popularity, it's provincial/parochial (or corrupt) nature being technologically "modernized" and rationalized, mirror the justification reasonings behind colonialism, which held a concept of beneficent, educating husbandry and willful, well-rewarded participants in the culture. This is not to say that they are the same, we are in a different time in history, but only that the ethical questions about colonialism likely need to also be answered in this case, where "development" by powerful outside forces and interests is assumed as an unproblematic Good.
    • This is aside from the worrisome corrosive effect of replacing extremely knowledgeable, deeply invested in-stadium fans with phone scrolling tourists who know very little about the sport or what is going on in the ring. A sport (and art) in a certain sense cannot survive at a high level of performance with such a huge in-stadium fan disparity. Audience will over time shape the product...when it becomes a "product". This is one of the quagmires of a consumerist approach. 
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

    • Private Girls From Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Cacual Dating https://Cupidon.Top [url=https://Cupidon.Top] Private Girls From Your Town [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie NEW GIRLS [url=https://Cupidon.Top/girl/chloe-ziva-49.html]Chloe Ziva[/url] [url=https://Cupidon.Top/girl/lola-la-fleur-11.html]Lola La Fleur[/url] [url=https://Cupidon.Top/girl/suki-82.html]Suki[/url] [url=https://Cupidon.Top/girl/hillary-is-wet-13.html]Hillary is WET[/url] [url=https://Cupidon.Top/girl/bamby-belle-104.html]Bamby Belle[/url] [url=https://Cupidon.Top/girl/luminatria-29.html]Luminatria[/url] [url=https://Cupidon.Top/girl/anna-cute-fox-114.html]Anna Cute fox[/url]
    • That sounds promising if you've already moved, how are things going for you now? 
    • I'm sorry I don't really know. Sylvie is in touch with a collector and this person is where she buys hers, but there are not multiple copies available. Maybe someone else would know of a larger source.
    • Where can I find some physical old Muay Thai magazines? I am located in Bangkok. Thanks
    • I can only comment on Perth. There's a very active Muay Thai scene here - regular shows. Plenty of gyms across the city with Thai trainers. All gyms offer trial classes so you can try a few out before committing . Direct flights to Bangkok and Phuket as well. Would you be coming over on a working holiday visa? Loads of work around Western Australia at the moment. 
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.4k
    • Total Posts
      11.7k
×
×
  • Create New...