Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This Saturday past, I helped promote "Thai Championship Boxing 10" (TCBX) in Ashburn, VA.  (I'm the matchmaker for this event series)  We had 14 amateur fights, including Full Rules Muay Thai, Modified Rules Muay Thai, & Glory Rules Kickboxing.  

I had 3 fighters on the card, each having a completely different result.  (technically, I only had 2 fighters on the card, but the one kid USED to train with me so I still feel he's "mine", LOL).

My first fighter fought in a 5-round full rules non-title match.  This fighter actively trains with me privately AND at the gym where I coach.  It was, by most people's comments, the fight of the night.  It was 2 fighters who are both 6'3" tall and weigh 155 lbs.  These guys blasted each other for all 5 rounds.  All I can say is that if you're going to lose a fight, THAT'S the way to lose a fight!!!!  The arena went NUTS for this match!  My fighter wound up losing via Majority Decision (2 judges chose his opponent, the 3rd judge deemed the match a draw).

11159982_10152915888426633_8452574617473

George Jefferis from Team Forged in Raleigh, NC vs. Matt Kovacic from Pentagon MMA (my gym) in Arlington, VA on the right.

 

My 2nd fighter fought in a 5-round full rules title match at 175 lbs.  This fighter has his own team, but he is managed by me and comes to train privately.  He and his opponent both had a bit of a layoff since their last fight, so this fight was fought in an overly cautious manner the whole 5 rounds with my fighters opponent taking it on points.  It was a good match, technically speaking, but it was boring to watch because there simply wasn't a lot of action.  My fighter didn't even need me to criticize, he was able to tell me himself what he did wrong before I said it...  "Man, I just couldn't pull the trigger!"

 

My 3rd fighter no longer trains with me, but he had started training under Master K when he was 6 years old (he's 22 years old now).  Shortly afterwards Master K relocated to New Jersey permanently and I took over the Muay Thai program and his training.  He trained under me for the next 5-6 years before I switched gyms.  He chose to stay at the gym I left due to travel distance, but I've remained close with him and his family.  He fought a 5 round full rules title fight at 140 lbs and won via KO in either the 3rd or 4th round....

11164685_10152916173581633_3153644113412

Me on the left posing with Jonathan George from Seapeanong Muay Thai in Lorton, VA on the right.

 

There were a number of other great fights that evening, especially our "Main Event" which featured two young ladies (14 & 15 years old) battling for the 105 lbs Junior Muay Thai title.  The match was called a draw (I completely disagree with that decision), but it was a REALLY good fight.  One girl was more of a boxer/brawler, and the other girl was more of a Muay Thai technician, though she wasn't afraid of mixing it up!  So while I totally disagree with the decision, both girls fought their hearts out and should be proud of their performance!

 

TCB11 is scheduled for Aug. 22nd!

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • Speculatively, it seems likely that the real "warfare roots" of ring Muay Thai goes back to all the downtime during siege encampment, (and peacetime) Ayutthaya's across the river outer quarters. One of the earliest historical accounts of Siamese ring fighting is of the "Tiger King" disguising himself and participating in plebeian ring fighting. This is not "warfare fighting" and goes back several hundred years. One can imagine that such fighting would share some fighting principles with what occurred on the battlefield, but as it was unarmed and likely a gambling driven sport it - at least to me - likely seems like it has had its very own lineage of development. Less was the case that people were bringing battlefield lessons into the ring, and more that gambled on fighting skills developed ring-to-ring. In such cases of course, developing balance and defensive prowess would be important.  Incidentally, any such Ayutthaya ring-to-ring developments hold the historical potential for lots of cross-pollination from other fighting arts, as Ayutthaya maintained huge mercenary forces, not only from Malaysia and the cusp of islands, but even an entire Japanese quarter, not to mention a strong commercially minded Chinese presence. These may have been years of truly "mixing" fighting arts in the gambling rings of the city (it is unknown just how separatist each culture was in this melting pot, perhaps each kept to their own in ring fighting).
    • For anyone who follows my writings I do not argue for any sense of a "pure" Muay Thai, or even Siamese fighting art history. Quite different than such I take one of Siam and Thai strengths is just how integrative they have been over centuries of development (while, importantly, preserving its core identity). For instance Western Boxing has had a powerful influence upon the form and development of Muay Thai for well over 100 years, and helped make it perhaps the premiere ring fighting art in the world, but Western Boxing itself was a very deep, complexly developed art which mapped quite well upon traditional Muay Thai in many areas, allowing it to flourish. This is quite different than the de-skilling that is happening in the sport right now, where instead the sport is being turned towards a less-skilled development, for really commercial reasons.  The story of whether the influx of attention, branding, not to mention the very important monetary investment that Entertainment Muay Thai has brought will actually help "save" traditional Muay Thai is yet to be written. It very well might, as the sport was reaching some important demographic and cultural dead-ends, and it needed an infusion. But, let's not have it be lost, what itself is being lost, which is the actual very high level of skill Thailand had produced...and how it had developed it. Let's keep our eye on the de-skilling.
    • One of the more slippery aspects of this change is that in its more extreme versions Entertainment Muay Thai was a redesign to actually produce Western (and other non-Thai) winners. It involved de-skilling the Thai sport simply because Thais were just too good at the more complex things. Yes, it was meant to appeal to International eyes, both in the crowd (tourist shows) and on streams, but the satisfying international element was actually Western (often White) winners of fights, and ultimately championship belts. The de-skilling of the sport and art was about tipping the playing field hard (involving also weigh-in changes that would favor larger bodied international fighters). Thais had to learn - and still have to learn - how to fight like the less skilled Westerners (and others). In some sense its a crazy, upside-down presentation of foreign "superiority", yes driven by hyper Capitalism and digital entertainment, but also one which harkens back to Colonialism where the Western power teaches the "native" "how its really done", and is assumed to just be superior in Nature. The point of fact is that Thais have been arguably the best combat sport fighters in the world over the last 50 years, and it is not without irony that the form of their skill degradation is sometimes framed as a return to Siam/Thai warfare roots. It's not. Its a simplification of ring fighting for the purpose of international appeal. 
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.4k
    • Total Posts
      11.6k
×
×
  • Create New...