Jump to content

Ballet and muay thai


Recommended Posts

Has anyone crosstrained between disciplines ? Specifically ballet and muay thai ? If not those, any other cross training ? Have you seen any improvement as a result of cross training or decline in abilities as a result of doing so ?

 

I am starting ballet lessons Friday to help improve my balance and flexibility, especially in my hips and legs. I've heard of people doing so, but not much past that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure you will learn a lot at ballett classes, but I consider crosstraining with such far away disciplines a bit distracting. I used to do a lot of various sport activities in my years off martial arts, but I see that I get the best progress when I crosstrain only muay thai with muay thai and a bit of weight training in between ;) I want to add yoga to it, but don't have enough time. I manage to go to one yoga class a month, which can not be considered cross-training ;)

I'm curious of what you're experience with ballett will be  :) 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know of anyone who has cross-trained in ballet, but I'm sure there's something to be gained from it. Whether or not there are other methods or disciplines that would better improve your muay thai than ballet is a different question. I do BJJ once or twice a week, but just out of interest in the sport itself. I've only just started so I'm yet to see if that improves my stability/strength in the clinch. I do cross-train in western boxing once a week and it has improved my boxing technique but I haven't taken any sparring classes yet. 

You might enjoy this article if you haven't already come across it :) The Muay Thai Fighter and the Ballerina: A Portrait of Two Artists

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've learned ballet in the past and I find it helps with understanding Muay Thai as a new student--understanding how to rotate the leg in the hip socket, the precision of movements in the legs, balance, etc. Not sure I'd take a class now to help my Muay Thai training though.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I remember correctly, Ali had a background in dancing. 

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-485250.html- Marquez did ballet training before his infamous knockout of Pacquiao. 

An olympian I met at wild card said he believes his success was from ballet when he was a kid. 

Enough evidence of usefulness? :)

Also, Expert Boxing's Johny Nguyen swears by dancing as a compliment to boxing -- his brother is a dancer. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 6 months later...

i have trained in ballet. I find it useful as it has strengthened all of my muscles, i have good flexibility and range for stretching joints. i have an understanding of directing the body, good co ordination, balance and experience in learning routine ( good for combos). also a thorough ballet training should offer some study of physiology. i am ashamed to say i missed most my physio classes and so missed a wealth of information that would inform ballet and muay thai. An awareness of muscle groups, bones etc would be amazing knowledge. I think this is only offered in advanced levels.

Mentally, ballet is great for discipline of mind. Practically for training routines and also for remaining focussed. awareness of warm up importance, spatial awareness, timing, rhythm. Obviously the legs and feet feature predominantly in both forms for example I can throw good knees because I understand how they 'look' as a dance aesthetic.Working your partner/opponent is also something dance experience helps with in terms of movement through fight space and improvised movement/leading movement. 

Energy is channelled in dance and in muay thai. This is a skill that is practiced in ballet. In muay thai I've been taught to fight from centre..'centre' is also where ballet is brought from.See Martha Graham's practice for work on the use of 'centre' in ballet and M.Cunnigham's practice of 'centre' as a dance form.

The rotation in the joints especially the hip joints for kicking as mentioned above is also a ballet skill. the use of the mind to visualise movement is present in both forms.

The main difference i find is that within dance it is more usual to work with partners in a fluid way...ie they are allowing you to move them around for e.g..Obviosuly fighting is about an opposition of forces..which does occur in dance of course but dance will explore the dynamics of both fluidity and opposition. Great dance can be made form one partner refusing to move and causing momentum in their partner...which is in some way similar to fight partners opposing each other s force. 'ducking' blows or moving out of the way of punches and kicks is also something that contemporary ballet will explore...moving out of the dance partners movements to create dance. 

Both dance and muay thai are improvisational even though they both have definite routine. the improvisation skill will come in when deciding how to attack, which moves to make.

On a downside..in ballet I was taught to work from centre in 2nd position. 2nd position is where the hips are turned out (as we do for kicks)but the feet are heels together and then rotated in line with the hips to an open position (its a lot easier to do or see this than describe in type!)  Every dance movement falls BACK into centre and 2nd. This is find impedes my muay thai practice because of course we are fighting from centre, but in stance. Stance is completely different from 2nd ballet position and so if you're like me and trained to always go back there you have to mentally check that and make sure you fall in stance. Its hardly a big deal tho when you think of all the positives. 

I would recommend ballet to anybody. Its great for lots of things but I would say that cross training both at the same time may be confusing. You may need a very agile mind to keep all the movements separate.

I describe muay thai as a dance, an art. both disciplines are beautiful to watch.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6c025df628d55986a11c82cda236a03d.jpglouise le cavalier: lalala human steps..  

Louise le Cavalier (principle dancer: lalala human steps.) I would recommend watching 'human sex'in which lecavalier displays some great movement, strength and dynamics that represent a fight between people. Another good examples of fight dynamics in contemporary dance are company DV8.Their piece 'Monochrome Men"looks at latent violence within homosexuality....:) These companies are from the late 80's early 90's which is when I was dancing and fully engrossed in dance scene. Louise LeCavalier is my favourite of all dancers. I went to see her perform in Leeds with her new company and by the end of the show it felt like my whole body wanted to explode. I would like to offer this as an example around ballet as ballet has many contemporary forms outside of its traditions.Swan Lake by M.Bourne for example is an all male contemporary ballet. The freedom from tradition has allowed many creations of dance around fight dynamics. Its not all about en pointe and pink tutus. :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • Speculatively, it seems likely that the real "warfare roots" of ring Muay Thai goes back to all the downtime during siege encampment, (and peacetime) Ayutthaya's across the river outer quarters. One of the earliest historical accounts of Siamese ring fighting is of the "Tiger King" disguising himself and participating in plebeian ring fighting. This is not "warfare fighting" and goes back several hundred years. One can imagine that such fighting would share some fighting principles with what occurred on the battlefield, but as it was unarmed and likely a gambling driven sport it - at least to me - likely seems like it has had its very own lineage of development. Less was the case that people were bringing battlefield lessons into the ring, and more that gambled on fighting skills developed ring-to-ring. In such cases of course, developing balance and defensive prowess would be important.  Incidentally, any such Ayutthaya ring-to-ring developments hold the historical potential for lots of cross-pollination from other fighting arts, as Ayutthaya maintained huge mercenary forces, not only from Malaysia and the cusp of islands, but even an entire Japanese quarter, not to mention a strong commercially minded Chinese presence. These may have been years of truly "mixing" fighting arts in the gambling rings of the city (it is unknown just how separatist each culture was in this melting pot, perhaps each kept to their own in ring fighting).
    • For anyone who follows my writings I do not argue for any sense of a "pure" Muay Thai, or even Siamese fighting art history. Quite different than such I take one of Siam and Thai strengths is just how integrative they have been over centuries of development (while, importantly, preserving its core identity). For instance Western Boxing has had a powerful influence upon the form and development of Muay Thai for well over 100 years, and helped make it perhaps the premiere ring fighting art in the world, but Western Boxing itself was a very deep, complexly developed art which mapped quite well upon traditional Muay Thai in many areas, allowing it to flourish. This is quite different than the de-skilling that is happening in the sport right now, where instead the sport is being turned towards a less-skilled development, for really commercial reasons.  The story of whether the influx of attention, branding, not to mention the very important monetary investment that Entertainment Muay Thai has brought will actually help "save" traditional Muay Thai is yet to be written. It very well might, as the sport was reaching some important demographic and cultural dead-ends, and it needed an infusion. But, let's not have it be lost, what itself is being lost, which is the actual very high level of skill Thailand had produced...and how it had developed it. Let's keep our eye on the de-skilling.
    • One of the more slippery aspects of this change is that in its more extreme versions Entertainment Muay Thai was a redesign to actually produce Western (and other non-Thai) winners. It involved de-skilling the Thai sport simply because Thais were just too good at the more complex things. Yes, it was meant to appeal to International eyes, both in the crowd (tourist shows) and on streams, but the satisfying international element was actually Western (often White) winners of fights, and ultimately championship belts. The de-skilling of the sport and art was about tipping the playing field hard (involving also weigh-in changes that would favor larger bodied international fighters). Thais had to learn - and still have to learn - how to fight like the less skilled Westerners (and others). In some sense its a crazy, upside-down presentation of foreign "superiority", yes driven by hyper Capitalism and digital entertainment, but also one which harkens back to Colonialism where the Western power teaches the "native" "how its really done", and is assumed to just be superior in Nature. The point of fact is that Thais have been arguably the best combat sport fighters in the world over the last 50 years, and it is not without irony that the form of their skill degradation is sometimes framed as a return to Siam/Thai warfare roots. It's not. Its a simplification of ring fighting for the purpose of international appeal. 
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.4k
    • Total Posts
      11.6k
×
×
  • Create New...