Jump to content

1929 Newspaper article describing Siamese Boxing and other Thai Sports


Recommended Posts

The 1929 newspaper article was written by American travelogue author James Saxon Childers who went on to write and publish the book "From Siam to Suez" in 1932, detailing his adventures in Thailand and some his time spent watching Siamese boxing bouts.

The book is in the public domain and available to view and for free download from the Internet Archive, here:

https://archive.org/details/fromsiamtosuez010141mbp

SiameseSportsRoughAffairsThe_Birmingham_News_1929_02_17_75.jpg.6e8132cd458f645dba18c267bca270ca.jpg

Edited by jeffkantoku
Corrected book title
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

The 1929 newspaper article was written by American travelogue author James Saxon Childers who went on to write and publish the book "From Siam to Suez" in 1932, detailing his adventures in Thailand and some his time spent watching Siamese boxing bouts.

The book is in the public domain and available to view and for free download from the Internet Archive, here:

https://archive.org/details/fromsiamtosuez010141mbp

His accounts of Siamese boxing begin in Chapter IV, starting on page 22.

And again in Chapter VI, starting on page 31.

In the Birmingham News newspaper article, he mentions that 2500 spectators sat or stood in the different enclosures around the Bangkok arena.  Any idea where it would have been located? 

Edited by jeffkantoku
Added more information
Link to comment
Share on other sites

am researching and writing an action oriented screenplay set aboard a three-island tramp steamer anchored off the unnamed coast of a country modelled after Cambodia (originally set in 1953, but as I’m developing it, transforming it more into a fable with a non-specific time period, so at a time between 1920 and 1953).

Two of the crew members on board are the Thanikul brothers, Siamese twins, but bodily-fused only metaphorically.  They are Siamese Boxers who box against each other in a make-shift boxing ring on the ship’s closed cargo hatch.

I’d love to know of any sources (books or articles) in English recounting the history of Muay Thai or Muay Boran from the period between 1920 and 1953.

Have any Thai sources about Muay Boran from that period been translated into English?

Any writers’ names I should know of that period who wrote about this martial art?

I just want to get a feel for the attitudes of the people of this period about Siamese Boxing, both the colonialists and the locals.

I remember seeing a live Muay Thai match in Bangkok at a small outside ring, somewhere in Bangkok in 1996, as a tourist when I was living in Japan in the late ’90s. Can’t remember exactly where that was.

Thank you in advance for any information you could provide!

Cheers,

- Jeff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whybodyshotsfavoredinMuayThaispleenandliver.png.def647cd465d97644ecd38435f491582.png

 

This is a very interesting small section which may help explain a very fundamental difference between Thailand's Muay Thai and many other combat sports. Westerners in particular who favor hand-strikes have a hard time understanding Thailand's orientation to the body, especially the high scoring of knees and kicks to the body. This in part can be explained by a Siamese/Thai sense of the body which places the "self" in the torso, something many ancient cultures have and which we retain in thoughts like "he had 'guts'" or a "gut feeling". It seems that indeed the center of the person in Thai culture, his or her life-force is seen in the torso, and not in the "face" or "head", just as a matter of body mapping. But, here the wide-spread presence of malaria and the enlargement of the spleen (and liver) from malaria would even further explain the development of a kicking and kneeing fighting art, as these organs would be even more vulnerable...even by Childers account, life-threatening (never knowing if reports get exaggerated for foreign interests). The two aspects, the traditional centering of the life force in the torso AND the vulnerability of the spleen and liver may actually go hand in hand, one imagines. This is a very cool observation.

From material facts, even the effects of disease, an entire sophistication of attacks by knees and kicks may have developed, one not reducible to those specific vulnerabilities, as the aesthetic and the skills developed along their own paths. Notably, being able to control and protect the center of the body indeed likely unlocks many aspects of the spatial control of opponents, regardless of the vulnerability of specific organs. Malaria may have actually attenuated awareness which lead to high-order understanding of fighting itself.

Malaria may have been in Southeast Asia for 1,000s of years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As noted in private communication, this newspaper account seems like it captured one of the last fights in the Kard Chuek era in Bangkok:

It is interesting that the Childers newspaper article (1929) captures the time right went all glove-less fighting was reportedly banned by Rama 7 (1928) in Bangkok. The fight (possibly from 1928) was gloveless. He may have been reporting on one of the last gloveless fights of Bangkok (or, the decree was very unevenly enforced (more likely).

https://8limbsus.com/blog/modernization-muay-thai-timeline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if Childers book (1932) is far more romantic and florid than his Newspaper report (1929), but there is some contradiction in descriptions of fighters who "quit" (just acknowledge the opponent superior).

The newspaper article:

nostigma.png.6b70ab8e02a76cd8e8f63b2885edc259.png

 

The book:

effeminate.png.fb03e2e6aa38c61bd514ceb02088de5a.png

the book then recounts the Newspaper report that there is no stigma in quitting...but then immediately reverses the moment of quitting, into death.

Screenshot2025-04-14180047.png.33cd8cd993b458f549c1e8c3dd0ad9ab.png

 

This is one of the problems with Western reports at the time (and even fight footage), they have a kind of compulsion toward the florid because they want to report their experiences as incredibly exotic, like nothing a "civilized" man would ever see. And...they just indeed experience everything as quite exaggerated, as they were in very alien environments and everything as disorienting.

This author seems to portray death as fairly common in the Kard Chuek ring, and it may have been (but he struggles to make coherent sense of the fighter who just sits down without stigma)...but by report King Rama 7 in 1928 banned glove-less fighting in response to a death in a fight at the city pillar, which seems like an unlikely reason if deaths were quite common...though speculating perhaps it was a "civilizing" moment, that particular death, depending on particular reactions from Western visitors?

In his newspaper article Childers claims to have watched two fighters suffer spleen injuries who later died in the hospital, in his book he seems to have turned one of these into a death that he watched happen in the ring, of a boy in his "first fight" (this seems quite dubious), a boy who he watched train, who wanted to come to America. The propensity for embellishment (if not outright fabrication) seems strong with this writer.

laystill.png.82e6f28de9431b1fc476358f798ec6be.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

small note, it is interesting to see a 1930s account of an hour of shadowboxing:

shadowboxinganhour.png.6fd957fc25f5c0233ed48f7c64924eb2.png

It reminds me of Yodkhunpon's account of building his Muay Thai out of countless hours of shadowboxing, due to his lack of equipment or even explicit training in his rural village. The tale of endless shadowboxing goes back 100 years.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • Speculatively, it seems likely that the real "warfare roots" of ring Muay Thai goes back to all the downtime during siege encampment, (and peacetime) Ayutthaya's across the river outer quarters. One of the earliest historical accounts of Siamese ring fighting is of the "Tiger King" disguising himself and participating in plebeian ring fighting. This is not "warfare fighting" and goes back several hundred years. One can imagine that such fighting would share some fighting principles with what occurred on the battlefield, but as it was unarmed and likely a gambling driven sport it - at least to me - likely seems like it has had its very own lineage of development. Less was the case that people were bringing battlefield lessons into the ring, and more that gambled on fighting skills developed ring-to-ring. In such cases of course, developing balance and defensive prowess would be important.  Incidentally, any such Ayutthaya ring-to-ring developments hold the historical potential for lots of cross-pollination from other fighting arts, as Ayutthaya maintained huge mercenary forces, not only from Malaysia and the cusp of islands, but even an entire Japanese quarter, not to mention a strong commercially minded Chinese presence. These may have been years of truly "mixing" fighting arts in the gambling rings of the city (it is unknown just how separatist each culture was in this melting pot, perhaps each kept to their own in ring fighting).
    • For anyone who follows my writings I do not argue for any sense of a "pure" Muay Thai, or even Siamese fighting art history. Quite different than such I take one of Siam and Thai strengths is just how integrative they have been over centuries of development (while, importantly, preserving its core identity). For instance Western Boxing has had a powerful influence upon the form and development of Muay Thai for well over 100 years, and helped make it perhaps the premiere ring fighting art in the world, but Western Boxing itself was a very deep, complexly developed art which mapped quite well upon traditional Muay Thai in many areas, allowing it to flourish. This is quite different than the de-skilling that is happening in the sport right now, where instead the sport is being turned towards a less-skilled development, for really commercial reasons.  The story of whether the influx of attention, branding, not to mention the very important monetary investment that Entertainment Muay Thai has brought will actually help "save" traditional Muay Thai is yet to be written. It very well might, as the sport was reaching some important demographic and cultural dead-ends, and it needed an infusion. But, let's not have it be lost, what itself is being lost, which is the actual very high level of skill Thailand had produced...and how it had developed it. Let's keep our eye on the de-skilling.
    • One of the more slippery aspects of this change is that in its more extreme versions Entertainment Muay Thai was a redesign to actually produce Western (and other non-Thai) winners. It involved de-skilling the Thai sport simply because Thais were just too good at the more complex things. Yes, it was meant to appeal to International eyes, both in the crowd (tourist shows) and on streams, but the satisfying international element was actually Western (often White) winners of fights, and ultimately championship belts. The de-skilling of the sport and art was about tipping the playing field hard (involving also weigh-in changes that would favor larger bodied international fighters). Thais had to learn - and still have to learn - how to fight like the less skilled Westerners (and others). In some sense its a crazy, upside-down presentation of foreign "superiority", yes driven by hyper Capitalism and digital entertainment, but also one which harkens back to Colonialism where the Western power teaches the "native" "how its really done", and is assumed to just be superior in Nature. The point of fact is that Thais have been arguably the best combat sport fighters in the world over the last 50 years, and it is not without irony that the form of their skill degradation is sometimes framed as a return to Siam/Thai warfare roots. It's not. Its a simplification of ring fighting for the purpose of international appeal. 
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.4k
    • Total Posts
      11.6k
×
×
  • Create New...