Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello !

 

I discovered 8limbs.us quite recently and I find it amazing ! Thanks for all the good videos !

After watching the floating block, I decided to try it myself in order to improve my (still imperfect) kicks.

 

So here is my question : after training, I recorded two very short videos at home and since I don't see what's still wrong with my kicks, but I know they are not perfect yet, I though I could ask here  :sweat:

 

I'm interested in every details : arms position, legs position, hips rotation, etc.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDJGbSZi9bk

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R52m7cZ8IJY

 

I know the quality of the vid isn't perfect, but I didn't dare to record at the gym...

Thanks !  :thanks:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello !

 

I discovered 8limbs.us quite recently and I find it amazing ! Thanks for all the good videos !

After watching the floating block, I decided to try it myself in order to improve my (still imperfect) kicks.

 

So here is my question : after training, I recorded two very short videos at home and since I don't see what's still wrong with my kicks, but I know they are not perfect yet, I though I could ask here  :sweat:

 

I'm interested in every details : arms position, legs position, hips rotation, etc.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDJGbSZi9bk

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R52m7cZ8IJY

 

I know the quality of the vid isn't perfect, but I didn't dare to record at the gym...

Thanks !  :thanks:

 

Hey, I love that you posted these - it's a cool idea to have a community "workshop" on technique, to borrow a word from writers.

Keep in mind that there is no one right way to kick. So here are my suggestions based on what I see from my own experience, but surely your coaches have their own rules and you as an individual will have a personal style as well. Anyway, those are the disclaimers.

The foot of your standing leg is pivoting super strong, which is one style of kicking, but I'd recommend stepping out with that foot when you first initiate the kick. So, when you watch the video you should see your standing foot stepping at an angle closer to the chair. Your foot should disappear behind the chair as you're kicking.

You have really well-trained arm position with your arm swing and opposite side guard. The arm that you keep up by your face (your right arm, since this is a left kick) is what you use to re-balance yourself when you return the kicking leg, first in the block and then back to starting position. So the tighter you keep that arm, the better your balance will be when pulling your kicking leg back to the block and then back to starting position.

In the long run you want the floating block to be up a little higher, the same level as if you are checking a kick from your normal stance. But don't be too picky about that one, that's just an "eventually" or "ultimately" kind of goal that will take time as you get more comfortable with that floating block.

Each kick looks pretty uniform to the one before it, so that's a really good sign that you have control over your movements!

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote : "Hey, I love that you posted these - it's a cool idea to have a community "workshop" on technique, to borrow a word from writers."

Thanks, I wasn't sure the forum was a good place for such a personal question  :sweat:

 

I'll keep an eye on your advice, thank you very much !  :smile:  :thanks:

 

What do you mean by : " the tighter you keep that arm " ?

Should it be closer to my face ?

 

 

 

 

Welcome to the community Julien! 

Thanks !  :thanks:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

What do you mean by : " the tighter you keep that arm " ?

Should it be closer to my face ?

 

Yeah, it's close enough to your head but I mean put more of a squeeze in the arm. Like if you were trying to hold your hand on your head and someone else was trying to pull it away, how you'd squeeze to not let them pull it off. That's what I mean by "tighter." The tension in that arm will help you to re-balance yourself as you return off the kick (and as a guard if anyone tries to hit you while you're kicking). It doesn't have to be tense the whole time, but as your kick lands and you start to come back, then it should be tight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like if you were trying to hold your hand on your head and someone else was trying to pull it away, how you'd squeeze to not let them pull it off. That's what I mean by "tighter." 

 Got it !

 

Thank you :)

 

Happy new year  :sorcerer: (I'm two days early)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • Speculatively, it seems likely that the real "warfare roots" of ring Muay Thai goes back to all the downtime during siege encampment, (and peacetime) Ayutthaya's across the river outer quarters. One of the earliest historical accounts of Siamese ring fighting is of the "Tiger King" disguising himself and participating in plebeian ring fighting. This is not "warfare fighting" and goes back several hundred years. One can imagine that such fighting would share some fighting principles with what occurred on the battlefield, but as it was unarmed and likely a gambling driven sport it - at least to me - likely seems like it has had its very own lineage of development. Less was the case that people were bringing battlefield lessons into the ring, and more that gambled on fighting skills developed ring-to-ring. In such cases of course, developing balance and defensive prowess would be important.  Incidentally, any such Ayutthaya ring-to-ring developments hold the historical potential for lots of cross-pollination from other fighting arts, as Ayutthaya maintained huge mercenary forces, not only from Malaysia and the cusp of islands, but even an entire Japanese quarter, not to mention a strong commercially minded Chinese presence. These may have been years of truly "mixing" fighting arts in the gambling rings of the city (it is unknown just how separatist each culture was in this melting pot, perhaps each kept to their own in ring fighting).
    • For anyone who follows my writings I do not argue for any sense of a "pure" Muay Thai, or even Siamese fighting art history. Quite different than such I take one of Siam and Thai strengths is just how integrative they have been over centuries of development (while, importantly, preserving its core identity). For instance Western Boxing has had a powerful influence upon the form and development of Muay Thai for well over 100 years, and helped make it perhaps the premiere ring fighting art in the world, but Western Boxing itself was a very deep, complexly developed art which mapped quite well upon traditional Muay Thai in many areas, allowing it to flourish. This is quite different than the de-skilling that is happening in the sport right now, where instead the sport is being turned towards a less-skilled development, for really commercial reasons.  The story of whether the influx of attention, branding, not to mention the very important monetary investment that Entertainment Muay Thai has brought will actually help "save" traditional Muay Thai is yet to be written. It very well might, as the sport was reaching some important demographic and cultural dead-ends, and it needed an infusion. But, let's not have it be lost, what itself is being lost, which is the actual very high level of skill Thailand had produced...and how it had developed it. Let's keep our eye on the de-skilling.
    • One of the more slippery aspects of this change is that in its more extreme versions Entertainment Muay Thai was a redesign to actually produce Western (and other non-Thai) winners. It involved de-skilling the Thai sport simply because Thais were just too good at the more complex things. Yes, it was meant to appeal to International eyes, both in the crowd (tourist shows) and on streams, but the satisfying international element was actually Western (often White) winners of fights, and ultimately championship belts. The de-skilling of the sport and art was about tipping the playing field hard (involving also weigh-in changes that would favor larger bodied international fighters). Thais had to learn - and still have to learn - how to fight like the less skilled Westerners (and others). In some sense its a crazy, upside-down presentation of foreign "superiority", yes driven by hyper Capitalism and digital entertainment, but also one which harkens back to Colonialism where the Western power teaches the "native" "how its really done", and is assumed to just be superior in Nature. The point of fact is that Thais have been arguably the best combat sport fighters in the world over the last 50 years, and it is not without irony that the form of their skill degradation is sometimes framed as a return to Siam/Thai warfare roots. It's not. Its a simplification of ring fighting for the purpose of international appeal. 
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.4k
    • Total Posts
      11.6k
×
×
  • Create New...