Jump to content

Reputation and Game Planning


Recommended Posts

Hello Sylvie, Hello Kevin,

I just started following your activities very recently. I am very impressed by Sylvie's accomplishment in the sport but also by your eagerness to study, learn and improve. Your work ethics and your mental strength are off the charts - even for a professional athlete, I think. Having watched a number of fights, I have a many questions and would hope you could comment on some of them. I would like to inquire about the women that Sylvie is fighting:

Sylvie has fought over 260 times now. How about the women that you face? How many fights do they typically have under their belt? Do they fight as often as you and would they have a similar number of fights then? 

I understand that Muay Thai fighters start at a very early age and basically "live" their profession. Would that be true of the women that Sylvie is fighting as well? Do you have any idea at what age they started the sport and if they have a similar training regime as Sylvie? Are they economically depending on the prize money they win from fighting or do they chose to enter the sport as a vocation?

How is Sylvie's reputation in the scene. Would you think all the other women competing know Sylvie and her success? Do the other women know about Sylvie's fighting style and strengths? Is Sylvie feared by the other women in the sport in Thailand?

Sylvie ends many of her fights per KO or TKO. Some of them quite devastating (in particular Fights 234 and 241 against Nong Benz and 244 against Jomkwan Klangsangsarakam). Are these endings "normal" for the sport? I mean these women could not get back up for a while. In 244 Jomkwan barely managed to crawl out of the ring. Do these women recover and get back to fighting?

Thank you for your feedback!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll try to answer this is some detail, there are some great questions in there.

 

Quote

How about the women that you face? How many fights do they typically have under their belt? Do they fight as often as you and would they have a similar number of fights then? 

 

I don't believe there is a woman alive who has fought as much as Sylvie has, Thai or non-Thai, in any combat sport. The primary reason we took the approach of fighting so much is that Sylvie was starting later in life, so we took the "Thai way" of how young fighters grew in the sport. In Thailand when you are young you learn BY fighting, and you fight a lot. You fight every sort of opponent, and the quality of the matchups is governed, usually, by gambling interests. But, Thais do not continue fighting in this way. It's a growing process, but as soon as you start getting a name Thais tend to fight less often, in more controlled matchups, usually looking for other Thais that they can beat (forcing favorable matchups for themselves, winning beats) or names they can beat to build their reputation. For males this means the Bangkok Stadium circuit, for females it means the side-bet circuit. To keep fighting and fighting and fighting, as Sylvie does, as a Thai would mean not having the leverage to force favorable matchups, and building your "nobody can beat me" reputation.

 

As to the number of fights that Sylvie's opponents typically have, this varies of course, she's fought over 150 opponents. Some have fight numbers in the 100s or 200s (famous World Champion opponents like Thanonchanok or Loma), most probably have fight totals around 75 or so.

 

Quote

I understand that Muay Thai fighters start at a very early age and basically "live" their profession. Would that be true of the women that Sylvie is fighting as well? Do you have any idea at what age they started the sport and if they have a similar training regime as Sylvie? Are they economically depending on the prize money they win from fighting or do they chose to enter the sport as a vocation?

 

There are a lot of cliché ideas about Thai fighters that float about, that they are impoverished, fight for rice, or are forced into fighting in some ways. Yes, there are examples, but a lot of the pictures of Thai fighters out there are very broad brush, and are part of a exoticism of Thailand from the West. Not all Thai fighters (and I'll guess that we can just talk about female Thai fighters) start at a very early age. Some may start in their early teens. Not all are from poor family, many come from what we may call urbran middle class families, some even from more upperclass families (though there can be stigma with the sport). As to training regimes, I don't think there is a fighter in the world, male or female, Western or Thai, who trains like Sylvie. She's on her own path, reaching for something that isn't really in the sport. Thai female opponents are varied. Some may have started from a very young age and achieved fight brilliance and even World Championship status by the time they are 15, but then begin to coast because they have superior skills, accolades, and train rather modestly, especially when compared to their western opponents - I think someone like Thanonchanok is like that. Fighting at a World class level for 7 years or so, many Thai female fighters become slack, just when they are hitting their physical prime. There is no ascending "fight scene" of great opponents and also financial incentive to keep them pushing their development hard. Just another belt to win once in a while. Then there are a whole host of female Thai fighters who fight out of Sports Schools. They train together, while also going to school, fight each other in female fight scenes, compete for stadium belts, try to get on televised higher paying shows, fight for World titles, etc. Their training seems to be regular, but not super high level. They are generally highly skilled, usually quite experienced fighters (sometimes fighting as much as once a week) in reasonably athletic shape, trying to improve themselves. They can be from more middle class families. And then there are fighters who are younger but are rising stars that come out of the side-bet scene. They are super skilled, are beating all the top fighters of the province they are from, usually have around 70 fights or so. Often these fighters are in very good physical shape because they are prize fighters, and they may be fighting at the peak of their career.

 

Very few of Sylvie's opponents (as far as we can understand) are "economically depending on their prize money" in the more stereotypical sense of how that is imagined. They largely are fighting for their name, their pride, their position in the scene, many with hopes for dreams like getting on the National Team, which can be quite lucrative. There is such variety of opponent, it's hard to generalize, but that's the sense we get. Some treat it as a vocation, or a potential vocation, but there is such a lack of a progressive female fight scene, in the sense males have, the way forward is unsure.

 

Something that is also pretty unique in Sylvie's opponents is that 95% of them Sylvie doesn't even pick. We just find dependable promotions that will be a source for a volume of fights, and don't even give much voice (or even thought) about whatever opponent they choose for her. Most fighter handlers are angling for advantages, and reasonably so - part of the fight game is gaining the leverage and authority to shape matchups -, but Sylvie just goes with whatever the promoter chooses. We ask: What is the weight, and what is her name (just to see if she's fought her before), and that is about it. Promoters really like Sylvie for this reason, she's a very low friction fighter, willing to take disadvantages. 

 

Quote

How is Sylvie's reputation in the scene. Would you think all the other women competing know Sylvie and her success? Do the other women know about Sylvie's fighting style and strengths? Is Sylvie feared by the other women in the sport in Thailand?

 

Sylvie is something of a Unicorn of a fighter in Thailand. Many of the things she's become known for are just almost bizarre to Thais. She fights all over the country, in a variety of venues and promotions, whereas most fighters try to lock into lucrative single promotional, or powerful handles. Whereas most top Thai fighters quibble about 1 or 2 kg differences, Sylvie regularly takes on huge weight advantages even versus the best female Thai fighters in the country. She'll give up 5 kg, 7 kg to a literal World Champion. This just does not compute to Thais. And she wins (not always, but often). She got on the scale for a side bet fight, maybe a year ago, vs someone who is now the hottest Thai female fighter in Thailand, and was 5 kg lighter (after her opponent had cut), and their eyes practically fell out of their head. It's just not how it is done. Sylvie lost that fight, we are seeking a rematch, but it shows just out outside the lines Sylvie fights.

 

Everyone knows Sylvie's fighting style. In stadia where she has fought a lot, like Thapae Stadium in Chiang Mai, all the gamblers know what she's going to do. They match up huge weight disadvantages, and honestly the refs there break the clinch very quickly on her to make the match as exciting as possible, with both opponents having a chance. As to being feared, its really hard to know. She fights up so often, and on Thai television, it must create an aura. After Sylvie recently fought and beat a top fighter in the South (one of the very few she's fought her own weight), her opponent sat with her in the audience for a while, and told her nobody can beat her in the South. I pretty much know for sure that the present day WBC #1 ranked and WPMF World Champion near Sylvie's weight (a Thai) would never fight Sylvie, and probably for good reason. But, Thais also love coming after fighters with big reputations too, so there are always opponents. I think her reputation is that nobody at her weight in Thailand could beat her, but if fighting up 2 or 3 weight classes would be quite a scrap.

 

Quote

Sylvie ends many of her fights per KO or TKO. Some of them quite devastating (in particular Fights 234 and 241 against Nong Benz and 244 against Jomkwan Klangsangsarakam). Are these endings "normal" for the sport? I mean these women could not get back up for a while. In 244 Jomkwan barely managed to crawl out of the ring. Do these women recover and get back to fighting?

 

Oh, Jomkwan was definitely ok. She's one of the best (underrated) fighters in the world. She was walking around a few minutes later, and was cornering for a teammate. Nong Benz was ok too. Almost all of Sylvie's T/KO s are knee knockouts, which means either a liver shot or just taking someone's breath away. These aren't particularly damaging, but they can shut you down for a few minutes. The rate of her knockouts is pretty unusual in Thailand where points usually decide fights, especially given how much weight she gives up.

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Kevin von Duuglas-Ittu said:

As to training regimes, I don't think there is a fighter in the world, male or female, Western or Thai, who trains like Sylvie. She's on her own path, reaching for something that isn't really in the sport.

Thank you for your answers, Kevin. This does explain the success. Following up on that: How big an impact is the social media documentation on the success itself? I find Sylvie's comments on her own fights fascinating. Her insights open the door to what is actually going on (which as a layman I couldn't see before). I would have to think that doing this not only helps the followers on social media understand what is going on but should be very helpful for Sylvie herself to understand what she is doing well and what not and to improve herself. Basically, she is studying film of every fight. Since she is fighting some women more than once, studying the film of her last encounter must give her a huge advantage over her opponents if they didn't do that. In a couple of these videos Sylvie pointed out that she showed the fights later to her trainers and the former fighters that she is working with and they then gave her advice on what to do. How big of an impact is that? 

You mentioned above the "stigma" when talking about women from upper class families joining the scene. What is your sense of how Thais see Muay Thai fighters in general? Similar to MMA fighters in the west or even like football stars? Gambling seems to be a big part of the sport. How are the gamblers seen in Thailand? In the West this is seen as a vice. What is your sense how Thais look at this?

Finally, the pandemic must have had a massive impact on the scene. In one of your Vlogs you guys discussed that Clinching might be eliminated from the sport. Is the scene active at all now? Do you think that the sport will change as a result of the pandemic (in the sense that rule changes may become permanent)?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frank_B said:

 How big an impact is the social media documentation on the success itself? I find Sylvie's comments on her own fights fascinating. Her insights open the door to what is actually going on (which as a layman I couldn't see before). I would have to think that doing this not only helps the followers on social media understand what is going on but should be very helpful for Sylvie herself to understand what she is doing well and what not and to improve herself. Basically, she is studying film of every fight. Since she is fighting some women more than once, studying the film of her last encounter must give her a huge advantage over her opponents if they didn't do that. In a couple of these videos Sylvie pointed out that she showed the fights later to her trainers and the former fighters that she is working with and they then gave her advice on what to do. How big of an impact is that? 

Interesting observation, and I myself think, in much a spot on.

Because, its well known among serious students, to have  "learning journals" helps much in learning, in getting the knowledge mature.

And Sylvie together with Kevin does this, and in different forms. In written form, in discussing, in filming.  In talking about it, including these car ride blogs,, inside Sylvie´s  head it surely arouses new insights, and deepens up the knowledge.   And in fighting, obviously.   🙂

Just the talking on the task, none or very little of jolly joking around looking elsewhere.  None or very little of just empty talk.

Showing up the thoughs and films openly adds up in the same direction.  Its as an artist or writer or scientist:  You can paint or write for yourself, and its nice and worthwile.  But the real test, the real insights come, when you publish yourself, make yourself open for kibitzing - and criticizm.

 

Re social media.  There are comments.   I presume some of the comments may even be helpful, and helps to arise or deepen new insights?

 

So this is a campain on many different fronts, more or less coordinated.  Both physically and intellectually, and emotionally too.

 

 

Edited by StefanZ
  • Gamma 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Frank_B said:

Basically, she is studying film of every fight. Since she is fighting some women more than once, studying the film of her last encounter must give her a huge advantage over her opponents if they didn't do that. In a couple of these videos Sylvie pointed out that she showed the fights later to her trainers and the former fighters that she is working with and they then gave her advice on what to do. How big of an impact is that? 

I know it may be hard to believe because of the way people in the west treat film and video, but its actually a very small part of what is going on. Looking at her fights again, at the very best, might give her confidence that certain work she is putting in is paying off a bit, but 99% of what she is doing with her fight commentary is just reliving the event for the benefit of others. She's really just trying to relay everything that mattered. Any kind of advice from video from others is pretty minor, and very often advice from the outside can be misplaced, because they just don't understand (often) how Sylvie has to fight to win, given the circumstances of how her opponents fight her. Female Thai fighters don't fight like male stadium fighters, so much of the outside advice, if from a particular fight video, is based on classic fighting tendencies which are much harder to apply in the female fight scene. I would say the fight video experiences are way less than .1% of a benefit. On the other hand, her commentary done on all her Muay Thai Library film sessions is very helpful. It allows her to isolate more objectively, the lessons and important bits, and incorporate them in her training. For instance just looking at her bag work with Wangchannoi, objectively, got her to really radically change how she did bagwork recently.

 

15 hours ago, Frank_B said:

You mentioned above the "stigma" when talking about women from upper class families joining the scene. What is your sense of how Thais see Muay Thai fighters in general?

This is actually changing in real time in Thai culture, but there is a very long stigma of the living scene of Muay Thai in Thailand as low-class, dirty, wrong-side-of-the-tracks. Middle class families would enroll their kids in TKD classes, because it isn't shirtless, and they have nice clean white uniforms, for instance. But in the last 5 years or so gyms, and Muay Thai gyms, have been branding themselves much more to the upper classes in cities, as a way to stay fit for women, so the classic stigma is shifting.

It also has to be said that while Muay Thai has had a class stigma, it also, ideologically, has been very important for Thai Nationalism and identity. So Thai victories, especially vs foreigners, is much esteemed and glorified. Perhaps the same thing could be seen, in parallel, with western boxing, which had a history of lower-class and disreputable participation, but boxing victories were celebrated at a very high level. 

15 hours ago, Frank_B said:

How are the gamblers seen in Thailand? In the West this is seen as a vice.

There is a very strong moralistic slant against gamblers and gambling. Gambling is largely illegal throughout the country, for moral reasons. And in Thailand it is only lawful at specific stadia. That being said, the country is quite superstitious and the government lottery (and various black market lotteries) is a huge phenomena. But Muay Thai does suffer socially from its gambling stigma.

 

15 hours ago, Frank_B said:

Finally, the pandemic must have had a massive impact on the scene. In one of your Vlogs you guys discussed that Clinching might be eliminated from the sport. Is the scene active at all now? Do you think that the sport will change as a result of the pandemic (in the sense that rule changes may become permanent)?

We've covered this in detail in the Muay Thai Bones podcasts, I think. Clinch has recovered in the sport, but it's place in the sport is less secure than what might be widely thought. I'm not really sure how much COVID will effect Muay Thai, a large part of that is how many surges of infection take place, and how effective the vaccine is. Muay Thai in Thailand finds itself in a difficult position. Because it is socially disreputable to some degree, and the first COVID cluster in Thailand came around Lumpinee (the 2nd one now, notably, has oriented now around an illegal casino), Muay Thai has to be super conservative in relation to COVID. It has an uphill PR problem. The reason why this is so complex is that Thailand's economy is heavily dependent on tourism, so while Thailand has had an amazingly good COVID safety record, one of the best in the world, there is great pressure to open up to tourists soon, faster than say a tourism competitor like Vietnam. Muay Thai in Bangkok and elsewhere is linked to tourism, so there is some risk in how and when the country will open up, which could cause long term problems with Muay Thai if things go wrong.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, StefanZ said:

Showing up the thoughs and films openly adds up in the same direction.  Its as an artist or writer or scientist:  You can paint or write for yourself, and its nice and worthwile.  But the real test, the real insights come, when you publish yourself, make yourself open for kibitzing - and criticizm.

Thank you for recognizing this. It's one of the hardest parts, especially for someone who has been inherently shy much of her life. We've felt from the very beginning an obligation to put it out there, to share the knowledge and the perspective, but it's been a balancing act, because at the same time Sylvie is developing to become a fighter, a great fighter, so the social web of relations isn't always helpful in that. We've just tried to be very nose-to-the-grindstone on this, and keep putting out more high quality thought, documentation, art. Everything...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • Really enjoyed this title fight between Jaroensook and Captainteam, a classic stand off between Muay Khao and Muay Femeu. Jaroensook is out of the Boon Lanna gym in Chiang Mai and Hill Tribe (and ethnic minority in the North) which has had some modest success in Muay Thai, and Captainteam is Kru Thailand's son, and one of the more femeu specialists in the sport now. I didn't really know Jaroensak so the first round mislead me. He looked really comfortable leading with hands and I thought he was going to be a Muay Maat fighter (Boon Lanna has had a few aggressive Muay Maat fighters), but in the second round he went straight into Muay Khao persistence hunting, never rushing, just getting positive entry positions (better than in the first round) and starting to foil TeamCaptain's excellent throw-game. I'm pretty much always going to subconsciously watch for Muay Khao vs the femeu specialist, so nothing against TeamCaptain (love Kru Thailand!), it was just great to see that classic match up and the dynamics of yore. Also the finish - which looked borderline foul-ish, but clean enough - came out of nowhere in a way that is exactly how Muay Khao style works. You just start slowly degrading the ruup of the femeu fighter, not really winning the point fighting game, not even looking like you are having an effect yet, but then suddenly a door opens, the ruup is broken and open just for a moment and your "doh" (your continuous rhythms) just take the opening almost unconsciously.    It's also kind of cool to see Jaroensak achieve some clinch position success with a variety of Long Clinch, a style of clinch somewhat perfected by Tanadet Tor Pran.49. Below is a film study I edited together of his approach: This is an article we put out on Tanadet's Long Clinch style with video and screenshots.  Jaroensak doesn't lay out quite like Tanadet, and doesn't have full, wide manipulative base, but several times he got very strong positions in the clinch passing into Long Clinch dynamics for a few beats. Tanadet is Hill Tribe and from Chiang Mai, so I wonder if there was some influence or cross-over? He used to additionally train at the original Lanna Muay Thai, the gym Boon's gym has grown out of. You can find Tanadet's Muay Thai Library sessions here where he teaches the Long Clinch technique and style: #56 Tanadet Tor. Pran49 - Mastering Long Clinch (63 min) watch it here This is one of the most interesting and, if mastered, dominant clinch positions one can use, and the entire session is devoted to it. I filmed with young Long Clinch master Tanadet, and discover all the small refinements he created that turned what for many fighters is just a transitional position, into an entire system of attack. This is a rare session, capturing a little known and used clinch system.
    • There can be no doubt that Thailand's culture is a hybriding culture, a synthesizing culture that has grown from the root weaving diversity from influences around the world, reaching well back to when the Ayuthaya Kingdom was the commercial hub for the entire mercantile region, major influences stretching in trade all the way to China and all the way to Europe, if not further, while - and this is important - still maintaining its own Siamese (then Thai) character, a character that was both in great sympathy towards these integrative powers, but also in tension or contest with them. This being said, I think there is a rather profound misunderstanding of the nature of Thailand's traditional Muay Thai and the meaning and value of its underpinnings in the culture, when seen from the West, and this is the (at times) assumed majority of thinking of fighting as "labor", and the rewards or marking of that labor as some kind of "wage". This is often the conceptual starting place from which Westerners think about the value and possible injustices of Thailand's Muay Thai, often boiled down to the question: Is the fighter getting a "fair wage"?  I do think there are strong and important wage oriented justice scales that can be applied, but mostly these are best done in the contemporary circumstances of Thailand's new commodification of Muay Thai itself...that is to say, to turn traditional commitments and performances INTO labor, that is to say, to capitalize it. It is then that the question of labor and wage holds the best ground. But, the question of wage or payment fairness really is doing another operation, often without intent, which is by reframing traditional Muay Thai in terms of labor and wage, along with the strong normative, Capitalist sense that such labor should exist freely in a labor market of some kind, one is already deforming traditional Muay Thai itself, and in a certain sense perhaps...adding to its colonization, or at least its transmutation into a globalized, commodified humanity, something I would suggest the core values of traditional Muay Thai (values that actually draw so many Western adventure-tourists to its homeland), stand in anchored opposition to. To be sure, Capitalism is deeply interwoven into the fabric of Thai culture, and has been for much of the 20th century, but this weave is perhaps best understood terms of how Siam/Thailand's traditional Muay Thai is of the threads of greatest resistance to Capitalism itself (along with its atomizing, individualizing, labor/wage concept of human beings). When we think of the values that not only motivate fighters, but also structure and give meaning to their fighting, at least across the board of the Muay Thai subculture, we really are not in the realm of individualizied workers who sell their labor within a labor market. (This mischaracterization is perhaps most egregious when discussing Child and Youth fighting from a Western perspective, where it is very commonly repictured as "child labor" (ignoring the degree to which such terminology completely recasts the entire question of the meaning and value of fighting itself, within Thai culture). We are instead within a realm of traditional pre-Capitalist values (which themselves have morphed with tension with Capitalizing forces), a world of craft (not "work"), composed of strong social hierarchies that are in constant agonism with each other, where fighting is probably best understood as struggle over Symbolic Capital (with some modification to Bourdieu's concept). The traditional Muay Thai world is primarily not a world of labor and wage - anymore than, to use an even more traditional example, novice monks should be considered to be doing "labor" in wats and monestariess, for the (some would regard as false) "wage" of spiritual merit. Instead, the meaning and value of such commitments and performances are embedded within the traditional frame itself (a frame which can be examined or challenged for ethical failures, to be sure), and to extract them from that embedded value system and its attendant, inculcating motivations, is to subvert the very nature of Thailand's traditional Muay Thai.  It doesn't mean that Thai Muay Thai fighters don't fight "for" money, or that money's paid or won do not matter, in fact in a gambling-driven sport - gambling driven at its very first roots, both in terms of history and in terms of apprenticeship - money amounted indeed matter a great deal. It's just that the labor / wage framework is a significantly inadequate, and in fact destructively transformative in its inaccuracy (even when well-motivated).  This conceptual misunderstanding from the West is even made more complicated in that today's traditional Muay Thai is fast adapting to new "labor" style economic pressures, in the sense that fighters are increasingly working more - in a hybrid sense - in the tourism economy, both in gyms were they have to train and partner Westerners, and in the ring where they have to fight in a transformed way in Entertainment tourism vs Western tourists (tourist who may be viewed as both customers purchasing Thai services and also as discounted laborers), all with the economic view that the Western visitor holds a certain degree of economic priority. Traditional Thais are pressed now in towards becoming something more like laborers, while still maintaining many if not most of the customary motivations and the embedded values of Muay Thai, kaimuay subculture, leaving analysis perhaps best to a case by case basis.     
    • Welcome to the dark side. Honestly, the "blue belt" equivalent in Muay Thai is when you stop flinching during sparring and actually land a clean teep.  If you're training 2-3 times a week, you'll probably reach that "competent" level in about 18 months. Striking is weird because a lucky punch from an untrained giant can still suck, but by then you'll have the footwork to make them look silly.
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.4k
    • Total Posts
      11.6k
×
×
  • Create New...