Jump to content

At Home Gym: Heavy Bag Recommendation


Recommended Posts

Hey all. I started Muay Thai this January so I'm pretty new. In light of recent times, I've been following along with Sylvie's At Home Workouts and can really feel more comfort in the technicality of my Muay

But at the same, I've been itching to rip some punches and kicks into something. So I've decided to get a heavy bag to train during these quarantine days.

So my question is, since I can only get one, should I get a regular heavy bag (4'7") or a 6ft banana bag? (both weigh 150 lbs)

I can definitely see the argument for both. The natural and fluid swinging of the a regular heavy bag ecouraging more body movement as well as being helpful for teeps and clinching. But on the other hand, being able to do low kicks on the banana bag is a plus.

While watching training clips in Thailand, to my surprise, I noticed that a majority of the bags were regular heavy bags. Any reason for this?

Thanks for your thoughts!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I would say get the cheaper option! If they're the same price I personally recommend the banana bag, because unless you're training on a soft mat at home, falling over from a missed kick on the regular bag or from losing footing because you have to throw to the body on the regular bag would cause some accidents. 

I tend to use a half bag normally unless I'm specifically working on leg kicks or 'freestyling'. 

If you're gonna start swanging and banging the bag though, make sure you've got some decent handwraps/gloves (bag gloves would do) and that you're making a proper fist! Just to keep as safe as possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey there, 

I recommend the long heavy bag, for an all rounder. (Black and white in the picture) 
I recently added the tear drop bag to my gym for upper cuts and knees but I’m finding I’m still getting more wear out of the longer one. 
I can smash lower kicks on a longer bag too which is really satisfying on days I don’t feel flexible. 
hope this helps 👍🏼 

 

AC5FB272-6612-414A-9DA9-55BCF19AC775.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Normal heavy bag personal fave, one day wanna get one.

Much cheaper was the tiny little speedbag, so got that. Think you can buy for like 50 dollars US. But obvs cannot kick 😔 . Still great though and affordable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • Speculatively, it seems likely that the real "warfare roots" of ring Muay Thai goes back to all the downtime during siege encampment, (and peacetime) Ayutthaya's across the river outer quarters. One of the earliest historical accounts of Siamese ring fighting is of the "Tiger King" disguising himself and participating in plebeian ring fighting. This is not "warfare fighting" and goes back several hundred years. One can imagine that such fighting would share some fighting principles with what occurred on the battlefield, but as it was unarmed and likely a gambling driven sport it - at least to me - likely seems like it has had its very own lineage of development. Less was the case that people were bringing battlefield lessons into the ring, and more that gambled on fighting skills developed ring-to-ring. In such cases of course, developing balance and defensive prowess would be important.  Incidentally, any such Ayutthaya ring-to-ring developments hold the historical potential for lots of cross-pollination from other fighting arts, as Ayutthaya maintained huge mercenary forces, not only from Malaysia and the cusp of islands, but even an entire Japanese quarter, not to mention a strong commercially minded Chinese presence. These may have been years of truly "mixing" fighting arts in the gambling rings of the city (it is unknown just how separatist each culture was in this melting pot, perhaps each kept to their own in ring fighting).
    • For anyone who follows my writings I do not argue for any sense of a "pure" Muay Thai, or even Siamese fighting art history. Quite different than such I take one of Siam and Thai strengths is just how integrative they have been over centuries of development (while, importantly, preserving its core identity). For instance Western Boxing has had a powerful influence upon the form and development of Muay Thai for well over 100 years, and helped make it perhaps the premiere ring fighting art in the world, but Western Boxing itself was a very deep, complexly developed art which mapped quite well upon traditional Muay Thai in many areas, allowing it to flourish. This is quite different than the de-skilling that is happening in the sport right now, where instead the sport is being turned towards a less-skilled development, for really commercial reasons.  The story of whether the influx of attention, branding, not to mention the very important monetary investment that Entertainment Muay Thai has brought will actually help "save" traditional Muay Thai is yet to be written. It very well might, as the sport was reaching some important demographic and cultural dead-ends, and it needed an infusion. But, let's not have it be lost, what itself is being lost, which is the actual very high level of skill Thailand had produced...and how it had developed it. Let's keep our eye on the de-skilling.
    • One of the more slippery aspects of this change is that in its more extreme versions Entertainment Muay Thai was a redesign to actually produce Western (and other non-Thai) winners. It involved de-skilling the Thai sport simply because Thais were just too good at the more complex things. Yes, it was meant to appeal to International eyes, both in the crowd (tourist shows) and on streams, but the satisfying international element was actually Western (often White) winners of fights, and ultimately championship belts. The de-skilling of the sport and art was about tipping the playing field hard (involving also weigh-in changes that would favor larger bodied international fighters). Thais had to learn - and still have to learn - how to fight like the less skilled Westerners (and others). In some sense its a crazy, upside-down presentation of foreign "superiority", yes driven by hyper Capitalism and digital entertainment, but also one which harkens back to Colonialism where the Western power teaches the "native" "how its really done", and is assumed to just be superior in Nature. The point of fact is that Thais have been arguably the best combat sport fighters in the world over the last 50 years, and it is not without irony that the form of their skill degradation is sometimes framed as a return to Siam/Thai warfare roots. It's not. Its a simplification of ring fighting for the purpose of international appeal. 
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.4k
    • Total Posts
      11.6k
×
×
  • Create New...