Jump to content

The Study of a Muay Thai Guard Through Aesthetics | Diamond Guard


Recommended Posts

This post contains some of my photographic study of the Diamond Guard, a Muay Thai specific modification of an old western boxing guard often called the cross-armed guard, used by fighters like Archie Moore, Joe Frazier and George Forman. What I'm really interested in here is how photography itself can be used to explore a technique or a muay (a style), and the role that aesthetics plays in developing truly effective fighting skills and approaches. This is a particular interesting thought case because during the covid-19 shutdown Sylvie and I are working a great deal on this guard, something we would probably never do during regular training stints, and in many ways we are kind of making up its applications, and favorabilities, modeling them on Sylvie's muay as it already is trajectoried. Her Muay Khao forward advances, her drive to clinch engagements, the history of Muay Khao styles she models herself on. I shot these photos as a way of taking an aesthetic slice into the work we've been doing. What I'm interested in here is the way that aesthetics (or Aesthetics) - which often can be derided as the poor of a spectrum which holds "efficacy" on one end, and aesthetics on the other end - is actually the inflection point where the affective powers of the soul, the person, come to bear on the practicality of a technique. How it appears, what it feels like, what it communicates cuts into the shoreline of the Real of fighting. If one is to develop a defense, for instance, how it feels, what it expresses, what it looks like, may be vital questions for a fighter if one is going to reach the higher ceiling of one's capabilities, of its capabilities. Aesthetics, ultimately, allow the fighter to draw on the greater resources of the soul, the Self, to tap in a deeper poetry. And, this photo study is asking the question: What role can photography have in this?

1994122017_SylvieDiamondGuard-0014-2.thumb.jpg.dc2968ddd0c828c7610747f4391ecc66.jpg

 

1665796742_SylvieDiamondGuardcolor-9914.thumb.jpg.a62c2cca71606cd9cb206634e2b3c5ea.jpg

 

1085856543_SylvieDiamondGuardonblack-9921.thumb.jpg.318010a778fc6428cc7568342084cd98.jpg

 

2137567734_SylvieDiamondGuardontight-9941.thumb.jpg.06d4258c0ee8d1ea821f08ba524041f6.jpg

 

981335311_SylvieDiamondGuardsilentmovie-9976.thumb.jpg.19e9e067335f84f688830f85c88b4c89.jpg

 

981981518_SylvieDiamondGuardtheelbow-9932.thumb.jpg.6a34b664c793b03d28820aa1450b974c.jpg

 

278105142_SylvieDiamondGuardTwinSunsnarrow-9950.thumb.jpg.6c88aa1352ff15e359b2df79b4d28f8e.jpg

 

171030638_SylvieDiamondGuardTwinSuns-9919.thumb.jpg.40665e253aff80fd8ccdc096da7219aa.jpg

 

766514573_SylvieDiamondGuardclose-9952.thumb.jpg.b2f8932d107f59f69583ecf809063abc.jpg

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

observations on this perspective by photographer Dana Hoey, on another platform:

905361539_Annotation2020-04-10155256.jpg.086c94d0563605f1f544e917a534b9a9.jpg


 

Quote

 

Beautiful photos, Kevin. If photography consists of 4 main aesthetic traits (1. Can stop motion 2. Can change perspective. 3. Creates frame. 4. Consists of light and it’s absence), then these photos focus on a particularly interesting one - the frame. I’ve read Sylvia talking about the frame in clinch, doesn’t apply in the same way here I expect but the guard is a frame for a potential shot. Perspective is also interesting in these. As a purely photographic (non-painterly) quality perspective usually means an odd choice of angle, from the 2nd story or the ground. Here it’s the perspective of the attacker. Very cool.

Also - fight photography usually features #1 - stopping motion. Cool to have your aesthetic built on these more obscure (in fight photography) traits.

Oops forgot two more traits - depth perception (field of focus) and level of accutance or sharpness (my least favorite. Everyone loves sharpness n photos. It’s nice but it’s not the only thing).

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Heart 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

What I'm interested in, perhaps, is how the mood of a technical aesthetic can be capture and intensified by photography, and then possibly feedback and inform the development of the technique itself. Just as the role of play, or impersonation of a fighter can help us embody the technique in a higher, more affectively deep way. As photography is able to focus those aesthetic rays, in a sculpting way, I wonder if it can open up a technique to more of what it can truly be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • Speculatively, it seems likely that the real "warfare roots" of ring Muay Thai goes back to all the downtime during siege encampment, (and peacetime) Ayutthaya's across the river outer quarters. One of the earliest historical accounts of Siamese ring fighting is of the "Tiger King" disguising himself and participating in plebeian ring fighting. This is not "warfare fighting" and goes back several hundred years. One can imagine that such fighting would share some fighting principles with what occurred on the battlefield, but as it was unarmed and likely a gambling driven sport it - at least to me - likely seems like it has had its very own lineage of development. Less was the case that people were bringing battlefield lessons into the ring, and more that gambled on fighting skills developed ring-to-ring. In such cases of course, developing balance and defensive prowess would be important.  Incidentally, any such Ayutthaya ring-to-ring developments hold the historical potential for lots of cross-pollination from other fighting arts, as Ayutthaya maintained huge mercenary forces, not only from Malaysia and the cusp of islands, but even an entire Japanese quarter, not to mention a strong commercially minded Chinese presence. These may have been years of truly "mixing" fighting arts in the gambling rings of the city (it is unknown just how separatist each culture was in this melting pot, perhaps each kept to their own in ring fighting).
    • For anyone who follows my writings I do not argue for any sense of a "pure" Muay Thai, or even Siamese fighting art history. Quite different than such I take one of Siam and Thai strengths is just how integrative they have been over centuries of development (while, importantly, preserving its core identity). For instance Western Boxing has had a powerful influence upon the form and development of Muay Thai for well over 100 years, and helped make it perhaps the premiere ring fighting art in the world, but Western Boxing itself was a very deep, complexly developed art which mapped quite well upon traditional Muay Thai in many areas, allowing it to flourish. This is quite different than the de-skilling that is happening in the sport right now, where instead the sport is being turned towards a less-skilled development, for really commercial reasons.  The story of whether the influx of attention, branding, not to mention the very important monetary investment that Entertainment Muay Thai has brought will actually help "save" traditional Muay Thai is yet to be written. It very well might, as the sport was reaching some important demographic and cultural dead-ends, and it needed an infusion. But, let's not have it be lost, what itself is being lost, which is the actual very high level of skill Thailand had produced...and how it had developed it. Let's keep our eye on the de-skilling.
    • One of the more slippery aspects of this change is that in its more extreme versions Entertainment Muay Thai was a redesign to actually produce Western (and other non-Thai) winners. It involved de-skilling the Thai sport simply because Thais were just too good at the more complex things. Yes, it was meant to appeal to International eyes, both in the crowd (tourist shows) and on streams, but the satisfying international element was actually Western (often White) winners of fights, and ultimately championship belts. The de-skilling of the sport and art was about tipping the playing field hard (involving also weigh-in changes that would favor larger bodied international fighters). Thais had to learn - and still have to learn - how to fight like the less skilled Westerners (and others). In some sense its a crazy, upside-down presentation of foreign "superiority", yes driven by hyper Capitalism and digital entertainment, but also one which harkens back to Colonialism where the Western power teaches the "native" "how its really done", and is assumed to just be superior in Nature. The point of fact is that Thais have been arguably the best combat sport fighters in the world over the last 50 years, and it is not without irony that the form of their skill degradation is sometimes framed as a return to Siam/Thai warfare roots. It's not. Its a simplification of ring fighting for the purpose of international appeal. 
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.4k
    • Total Posts
      11.6k
×
×
  • Create New...