Jump to content

The Study of a Muay Thai Guard Through Aesthetics | Diamond Guard


Recommended Posts

This post contains some of my photographic study of the Diamond Guard, a Muay Thai specific modification of an old western boxing guard often called the cross-armed guard, used by fighters like Archie Moore, Joe Frazier and George Forman. What I'm really interested in here is how photography itself can be used to explore a technique or a muay (a style), and the role that aesthetics plays in developing truly effective fighting skills and approaches. This is a particular interesting thought case because during the covid-19 shutdown Sylvie and I are working a great deal on this guard, something we would probably never do during regular training stints, and in many ways we are kind of making up its applications, and favorabilities, modeling them on Sylvie's muay as it already is trajectoried. Her Muay Khao forward advances, her drive to clinch engagements, the history of Muay Khao styles she models herself on. I shot these photos as a way of taking an aesthetic slice into the work we've been doing. What I'm interested in here is the way that aesthetics (or Aesthetics) - which often can be derided as the poor of a spectrum which holds "efficacy" on one end, and aesthetics on the other end - is actually the inflection point where the affective powers of the soul, the person, come to bear on the practicality of a technique. How it appears, what it feels like, what it communicates cuts into the shoreline of the Real of fighting. If one is to develop a defense, for instance, how it feels, what it expresses, what it looks like, may be vital questions for a fighter if one is going to reach the higher ceiling of one's capabilities, of its capabilities. Aesthetics, ultimately, allow the fighter to draw on the greater resources of the soul, the Self, to tap in a deeper poetry. And, this photo study is asking the question: What role can photography have in this?

1994122017_SylvieDiamondGuard-0014-2.thumb.jpg.dc2968ddd0c828c7610747f4391ecc66.jpg

 

1665796742_SylvieDiamondGuardcolor-9914.thumb.jpg.a62c2cca71606cd9cb206634e2b3c5ea.jpg

 

1085856543_SylvieDiamondGuardonblack-9921.thumb.jpg.318010a778fc6428cc7568342084cd98.jpg

 

2137567734_SylvieDiamondGuardontight-9941.thumb.jpg.06d4258c0ee8d1ea821f08ba524041f6.jpg

 

981335311_SylvieDiamondGuardsilentmovie-9976.thumb.jpg.19e9e067335f84f688830f85c88b4c89.jpg

 

981981518_SylvieDiamondGuardtheelbow-9932.thumb.jpg.6a34b664c793b03d28820aa1450b974c.jpg

 

278105142_SylvieDiamondGuardTwinSunsnarrow-9950.thumb.jpg.6c88aa1352ff15e359b2df79b4d28f8e.jpg

 

171030638_SylvieDiamondGuardTwinSuns-9919.thumb.jpg.40665e253aff80fd8ccdc096da7219aa.jpg

 

766514573_SylvieDiamondGuardclose-9952.thumb.jpg.b2f8932d107f59f69583ecf809063abc.jpg

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

observations on this perspective by photographer Dana Hoey, on another platform:

905361539_Annotation2020-04-10155256.jpg.086c94d0563605f1f544e917a534b9a9.jpg


 

Quote

 

Beautiful photos, Kevin. If photography consists of 4 main aesthetic traits (1. Can stop motion 2. Can change perspective. 3. Creates frame. 4. Consists of light and it’s absence), then these photos focus on a particularly interesting one - the frame. I’ve read Sylvia talking about the frame in clinch, doesn’t apply in the same way here I expect but the guard is a frame for a potential shot. Perspective is also interesting in these. As a purely photographic (non-painterly) quality perspective usually means an odd choice of angle, from the 2nd story or the ground. Here it’s the perspective of the attacker. Very cool.

Also - fight photography usually features #1 - stopping motion. Cool to have your aesthetic built on these more obscure (in fight photography) traits.

Oops forgot two more traits - depth perception (field of focus) and level of accutance or sharpness (my least favorite. Everyone loves sharpness n photos. It’s nice but it’s not the only thing).

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Heart 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

What I'm interested in, perhaps, is how the mood of a technical aesthetic can be capture and intensified by photography, and then possibly feedback and inform the development of the technique itself. Just as the role of play, or impersonation of a fighter can help us embody the technique in a higher, more affectively deep way. As photography is able to focus those aesthetic rays, in a sculpting way, I wonder if it can open up a technique to more of what it can truly be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • Karuhat leaves our house after another PRP treatment this afternoon, a big American seminar tour in Feb. I have trepidation that he literally could be an accidental target for ICE and other anti-foreigner tactics. Going to my home country and maybe at risk. 
    • Many are curious or questioning why I’ve become so focused on fighters of the Golden Age, if it might be some form of nostalgia, or a romance of exoticism for what is not now. Truthfully, it is just that of the draw of a mystery, the abiding sense of: How did they do that?, something that built up in me over many years, a mystery increasing over the now hundreds of hours I’ve spent in the presence of Golden Age fighters - both major and minor. Originally it came from just standing in the ring with them, often filming close at hand, and getting that practically synaptic, embodied sense that this is just so different, the feeling you can only get first hand - especially in comparison. You can see it on video, and it is apparent, but when you feel it its just on another order, an order of true mystery. When something moves through the space in a new or alter way it reverberates in you. How is it that these men, really men from a generation or two, move like this. It’s acute in someone like Karuhat, or Wangchannoi, or Hippy, but it is also present in much lessor names you will never know. It’s in all of them, as if its in the water of their Time. I’ve interviewed and broken down all the possible sources of this. It seems pretty clear that it did not come to them out of some form of instruction. It was not dictated or explicitly shown, explained (so when coaches today do these today they are not touching on that vein). It does not seem sufficient to think that it came from just a very wide talent pool, the sheer number of young fighters that were dispersed throughout the country in the 1980s, as if sheer natural selection pulled those movements and skills out. It did not come from sheerly training hard - some notable greats did not train particularly hard, at least by reputation. It’s not coached, its not trained, its not numerical. A true mystery. Fighters would come from the provinces with a fairly substantial number of fights, but at a skill level which they would say isn’t very strong, and within only a few years be creating symphonies in the ring. Karuhat was 16 when he fought his first fight (with zero training) and by 19 was one of the best fighters who ever lived. Sirimongkol accidentally killed an opponent in the provinces (I would guess a medical issue for the opponent, a common strike) and was pulled down to Bangkok because of this sudden "killer" reputation, but he’d tell you that he was completely unskilled and of little experience. Within a few years he was among the very best of his generation. We asked him: Who trained you, who taught you?, expecting some insight into a lineage of knowledge and he told us “Nobody. I learned from watching others.” This runs so hard against the primary Western assumptions of how Knowledge is kept, recorded and passed, but it is a story we heard over and over. Somehow these men, both famous and not, developed keen, beautiful (very precise) movement and acute combat potency without direct transmission or even significant instructional training. The answer could be located nowhere…in no particular place or function. Sherlock Holmes said of a mystery: Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.. All these things that we anticipate make great fighters, these really seem to be the impossible here. They were not the keys, it seems. Instead it appears that it was in the very weave of the culture, and the subcultures of Muay Thai, within the structures of the kaimuay experiences, in the richly embedded knowledges of everyone in the game, in the states of relaxation of the aesthetics of muay itself, in the practices of play, in the weft of festival fighting, the warp of equipmentless training, in endurance, in the quixotic powers of gambling, the Mother’s Milk of Muay Thai itself, which is a very odd but beautiful thing to conclude. It does pose something of a nostalgia, because many of these cultural and circumstantial elements have changed - some radically altered by a certain modernity, some shifted subtly - so there is a dimension of feeling that we want not to lose all of it, that we might still pull some substantial threads forward into our own future, some of that cultural DNA that made some of the greatest fighters ever what they were. It's not a hope to return to those past states, but a respect for what they (mysteriously) created. As we approximate techniques, copy movements, mechanize styles, coach harder and harder, these are all the things that make up a net through which everything slips out. Instead, this mystery, the how did they become so great, so proficient, so perceptive, so smooth, so electric, so knowing, stands before us, something of a challenge to our own age and time.
    • I guess you're in the UK?  If so, do college.  At your age it's free.  As for after college, do what youth allows.  Have a go at fighting.   You pay for uni whatever age you are.  Nothing wrong in doing something in uni in your mid -20's+.  I did a second degree in my 30's.  I would not have been held back by a career as a fighter earlier on.  As you get older, you begin to regret the things that you didn't do, far more than the things that you did.     Good luck in your fight career!
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.4k
    • Total Posts
      11.6k
×
×
  • Create New...