Jump to content

Learning Muay Thai - Early Childhood Development and Later Starts


Recommended Posts

moved from another thread to start a new line of discussion

This answer is kinda me thinking out loud haha.

I don't really have the answers to your question specifically but... in general terms (and this is purely my early childhood philosophy - not everyone's!) children learn best through play, so I imagine the kids around your gym are absorbing heaps of Muay Thai 'knowledge' through play, through adults modelling, through observation, through family and each other. Children make sense of their world through play so they probably mimic what they see important adults in their lives doing. I suppose this is a great example of how 'Muay Thai culture' is transmitted to the kids in a way that it can never be, for outsiders. It must just be in their blood - from being a baby around a gym, to playing to actually training. It's really mind blowing to think how integral it must be to their lives!

In terms of brain development and gross motor development, the learning of Muay Thai probably follows a progressive sequence - much like it does for adult beginners. Children who 'practise' these movements (whether through play or training) might be more likely to form the 'muscle memory' at quite a young age and then start developing the more cognitive skills of strategy and tactics, planning ahead and thinking about 'reading' their opponents intentions, at a later age when their cognitive function is more developed.

For instance, very young children are 'egocentric', meaning they find it difficult (or impossible) to put themselves in another's shoes (as a simple way of explaining it!). They can't really see another person's perspective. This is not 'egocentric' in the general usage sense of having a huge ego!

Sometimes children show you this trait when they say things like "Remember that dream where I was being chased?" They think because they know what was in the dream, that you will too. They can't put themselves in your shoes. This is one reason why young children have trouble sharing - THEY want the toy so that's all that matters. They don't understand that someone else might want it too. Its only later, they see the social payoff of sharing eg. adults are happy with you, kids share things back with you etc.

Until a child can cognitively move 'outside themselves' and see another's perspective, it would be pretty hard for them to predict an opponent's next move etc in Muay Thai. But the repetition in training (and playing) is also a vital way to develop the cognitive sense of sequence, order, successful combinations etc as well as the physical development of movements becoming 'second nature' and developing the required flexibility at such a young age eg. in the hips.

Sylvie, do you think the Thai kids and fighters you know are more flexible in general? Or is that totally an individual thing dependent on training or body type?

Definitely interesting to think about! Sorry for the rambling answer! I know, as a beginner myself, Muay Thai has been a very big mental challenge for me as well as physical. Moving from thinking about every single movement to some things starting to become second nature. Then in sparring, being under pressure, I could only barely think about my next move, let alone what my opponent was going to do next! Slowly, slowly I am working on getting better at these things. Little children probably do not think as overtly as we do about such things but develop their physical and strategic skills as they grow in age.

It would certainly be interesting to watch - maybe you have seen this, Sylvie, to some extent with Phetjee Jaa?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This answer is kinda me thinking out loud haha.

Sylvie, do you think the Thai kids and fighters you know are more flexible in general? Or is that totally an individual thing dependent on training or body type?

Definitely interesting to think about! Sorry for the rambling answer! I know, as a beginner myself, Muay Thai has been a very big mental challenge for me as well as physical. Moving from thinking about every single movement to some things starting to become second nature. Then in sparring, being under pressure, I could only barely think about my next move, let alone what my opponent was going to do next! Slowly, slowly I am working on getting better at these things. Little children probably do not think as overtly as we do about such things but develop their physical and strategic skills as they grow in age.

It would certainly be interesting to watch - maybe you have seen this, Sylvie, to some extent with Phetjee Jaa?

Flexibility is an interesting point because it's indirect. I never see Thais stretching. Even though Pi Nu tells westerners to "go stretch" and I've learned at several camps how to use the ring to learn how to open your hip for kicks (so it must be something Thais learn too at some point), I still never see them doing it. Sometimes Thais will come in for their very first session, whether kids or teens or adults, and within 20 minutes their kicks are awesome. It's incredible because it takes westerners years sometimes. But I reckon the flexibility in the hips comes from cultural differences like how squatting is still very common. In the west we start sitting in chairs from the moment we can sit up on our own and we rarely sit otherwise, so our hips develop an inflexibility that's not great for kicking. We have to "undo" something whereas cultures that still squat with some regularity don't have to "undo" anything.

I have a super hard time with the chess game, strategic part of Muay Thai. I'm a "dumb" fighter. A few of the guys who are holding pads for me lately are trying to get me to anticipate the next move, block because I know someone's going to kick back, etc. I'm just no there yet. Yesterday I was clinching with a kid who is very new. He's basically rocketed forward in his progress in a very short amount of time, but he's still very basic in everything. I was letting him knee me then I'd knee him back, over and over again. I figured out a while back how to jerk on the neck of the person I'm clinching every time they try to knee, which shuts down the strike. I know when the knee is coming - I don't know when distance strikes are coming. Anyway, I was telling this kid that he could anticipate my return knee because it happened every time after he kneed, and to shove me instead of letting me knee him. He tried it and was just beside himself at this new trick. He wouldn't have thought of it on his own - at least not for a long time; I only came up with it after a billion attempts at clinching - but he was receptive. A few other things I showed him he wasn't receptive; he wasn't "ready" for those yet.

That's what's hard about teaching Muay Thai, you try to shortcut everything by giving techniques and tricks before the basics are in there. So the student learns them as intellectual knowledge, but isn't ready to apply them yet as experiential knowledge. That right there is the whole story of everything I learned with Master K and am only now starting to be able to actually do. That's why little kids learning from such an early age, through play, is just light years beyond what we learn in classes. That's why your native language, learned naturally, is always going to be so much better ingrained than a second language that you learn through study. I have all this experience in my body but I never learned how to play so I can't access it. Then these little kids who basically mess around for an hour every afternoon are doing, like, spinning and flying moves out of nowhere. They've done that a hundred times already. It's not "a move," it's a game. And yeah, I absolutely see this in Phetjee Jaa and her brother Mawin.

 

 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flexibility is an interesting point because it's indirect. I never see Thais stretching. Even though Pi Nu tells westerners to "go stretch" and I've learned at several camps how to use the ring to learn how to open your hip for kicks (so it must be something Thais learn too at some point), I still never see them doing it.

Wow, I can't believe (as a generalisation), Thais don't stretch! I'm always so stiff, I have to stretch before each session. I thought cos I'm old but maybe its the cultural thing! I've never thought about that before.

 

I have a super hard time with the chess game, strategic part of Muay Thai. I'm a "dumb" fighter. A few of the guys who are holding pads for me lately are trying to get me to anticipate the next move, block because I know someone's going to kick back, etc. I'm just no there yet.

I'm so surprised to hear you say this about yourself. My trainer was taught in the femeur (spelling?) fighter technical style at a femeur gym and that is how I have been (am being) taught. He is trying to get me to read my opponents and try out things with them to see what they're going to do next. It's soo hard!

Now I know it's hard if an experienced person like you also struggles with it. I love this part of Muay Thai though, even though its so challenging. I think I am slowly getting better at it but I'm constantly thinking about this as I watch videos of fights etc, trying to see how fighters incorporate this intellectual side. I do love watching Saenchai's 'trickiness' for this reason - you can actually see him (with a lot of replaying!) work out how his opponent is going to react to certain situations and then he counters it perfectly. It really is inspiring to me.

I suppose this is another thing young kids can really incorporate via cultural Muay Thai osmosis! If they grow up constantly 'playing Muay Thai' with each other, they could become inherently good at this style without having to think through it like I do!

It must be amazing for you, and at times demoralizing, to watch little kids mastering difficult moves! I like to incorporate that sense of fun and play into my training too and I really appreciate some of the young guys/girls I train with who like to joke and muck around a little bit. We all take the training part seriously but it's nice to be able to laugh and really feel that enjoyment together when we're all doing something we love.

I love your comment about experiential knowledge too. I don't know how it happens, but sparring really does make you better. I get so frustrated sometimes and having a bad night at sparring on a Friday can really ruin my entire weekend. But sometimes, all the thinking and the training seem to come together into some sort of alchemy and there's an improvement or a breakthrough or a new technique makes sense! Like for children, the repetition does help and being able to use the knowledge in a real world situation (eg. sparring under pressure) really helps to integrate it. Most of the time I can't actually tell I've improved and if my trainer happens to mention something, I always quietly ask him later what he was referring to haha. I need to know so I can pay attention to what I've done or achieved and move on to my next challenge.

One thing I like to remember - even though kids have an age advantage and can really 'absorb' their Muay Thai, adults do have more advanced and developed brains (for the most part! haha) and that gives me hope that I can still learn the strategy and intellectual aspects of MT.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • More footnoting. Peter Vail in his 1998 dissertation sketching out a socio-religious basis for gambling, and Muay Thai gambling in particular, as an aspect of masculinity and charisma. See also this piece on Peter Vail's comparison of Muay Thai Masculinity to the Monk and the Nakleng (gangster): Thai Masculinity: Postioning Nak Muay Between Monkhood and Nak Leng – Peter Vail        
    • One of the most confused aspects of Western genuine interest in Thailand's Muay Thai is the invisibility of its social structure, upon which some of our fondest perceptions and values of it as a "traditional" and respect-driven art are founded. Because it takes passing out of tourist mode to see these things they remain opaque. (One can be in a tourist mode for a very long time in Thailand, enjoying the qualities of is culture as they are directed toward Westerners as part of its economy - an aspect of its centuries old culture of exchange and affinity for international trade and its peoples.). If one does not enter into substantive, stakeholder relations which usually involve fluently learning to speak the language (I have not, but my wife has), these things will remain hidden even to those that know Thailand well. It has been called, perhaps incorrectly, a "latent caste system". Thailand's is a patronage culture that is quiet strongly hierarchical - often in ways that are unseen to the foreigner in Muay Thai gyms - that carries with it vestigial forms of feudal-like relationships (the Sakdina system) that once involved very widespread slavery, indentured worker ethnicities, classes and networks of debt (both financial and social), much of those power relations now expressed in obligations. Westerners just do not - usually - see this web of shifting high vs low struggles, as we move within the commercial outward-facing layer that floats above it. In terms of Muay Thai, between these two layers - the inward-facing, rich, traditional patronage (though ethically problematic) historical layer AND the capitalist, commerce and exchange-driven, outward-facing layer - have developed fighter contract laws. It's safe to say that before these contract laws, I believe codified in the 1999 Boxing Act due to abuses, these legal powers would have been enforced by custom, its ethical norms and local political powers. There was social law before there was contract law. Aside from these larger societal hierarchies, there is also a history of Muay Thai fighters growing up in kaimuay camps that operate almost as orphanages (without the death of parents), or houses of care for youth into which young fighters are given over, very much like informal adoption. This can be seen in the light of both vestigial Thai social caste & its financial indenture (this is a good lecture on the history of cultures of indentured servitude, family as value & debt ), and the Thai custom of young boys entering a temple to become novice monks, granting spiritual merit to their parents. These camps can be understood as parallel families, with the heads of them seen as a father-like. Young fighters would be raised together, disciplined, given values (ideally, values reflected in Muay Thai itself), such that the larger hierarchies that organize the country are expressed more personally, in forms of obligation and debt placed upon both the raised fighter and also, importantly, the authorities in the gym. One has to be a good parent, a good benefactor, as well as a good son. Thai fighter contract law is meant to at bare bones reflect these deeper social obligations. It's enough to say that these are the social norms that govern Thailand's Muay Thai gyms, as they exist for Thais. And, these norms are difficult to map onto Western sensibilities as we might run into them. We come to Thailand...and to Thailand's gyms almost at the acme of Western freedom. Many come with the liberty of relative wealth, sometimes long term vacationers even with great wealth, entering a (semi) "traditional" culture with extraordinary autonomy. We often have choices outside of those found even in one's native country. Famously, older men find young, hot "pseudo-relationship" girlfriends well beyond their reach. Adults explore projects of masculinity, or self-development not available back home. For many the constrictures of the mores of their own cultures no longer seem to apply. When we go to this Thai gym or that, we are doing so out of an extreme sense of choice. We are variously versions of the "customer". We've learned by rote, "The customer is always right". When people come to Thailand to become a fighter, or an "authentic fighter", the longer they stay and the further they pass toward that (supposed) authenticity, they are entering into an invisible landscape of social attachments, submissions & debts. If you "really want to be 'treated like a Thai', this is a world of acute and quite rigid social hierarchies, one in which the freedom & liberties that may have motivated you are quite alien. What complicates this matter, is that this rigidity is the source of the traditional values which draws so many from around to the world to Thailand in the first place. If you were really "treated like a Thai", perhaps especially as a woman, you would probably find yourself quite disempowered, lacking in choice, and subject only to a hoped-for beneficence from those few you are obligated to and define your horizon of choice. Below is an excerpt from Lynne Miller's Fighting for Success, a book telling of her travails and lessons in owning the Sor. Sumalee Gym as a foreign woman. This passage is the most revealing story I've found about the consequences of these obligations, and their legal form, for the Thai fighter. The anecdote of the disorienting photo op meet is exemplar. While extreme in this case, the general form of obligations of what is going on here is omnipresent in Thai gyms...for Thais. It isn't just the contractual bounds, its the hierarchy, obligation, social debt, and family-like authorities upon which the contract law is founded. The story that she tells is of her own frustrations to resolve this matter in a way that seems quite equitable, fair to our sensibilities. Our Western idea of labor and its value. But, what is also occurring here is that, aside from claimed previous failures of care, there was a deep, face-losing breech of obligation when the fighter fled just before a big fight, and that there was no real reasonable financial "repair" for this loss of face. This is because beneath the commerce of fighting is still a very strong hierarchical social form, within which one's aura of authority is always being contested. This is social capital, as Bourdieu would say. It's a different economy. Thailand's Muay Thai is a form of social agonism, more than it is even an agonism of the ring. When you understand this, one might come to realize just how much of an anathema it is for middle class or lower-middle class Westerners to come from liberties and ideals of self-empowerment to Thailand to become "just like a Thai fighter". In some ways this would be like dreaming to become a janitor in a business. In some ways it is very much NOT like this as it can be imbued with traditional values...but in terms of social power and the ladder of authorities and how the work of training and fighting is construed, it is like this. This is something that is quite misunderstood. Even when Westerners, increasingly, become padmen in Thai gyms, imagining that they have achieved some kind of authenticity promotion of "coach", it is much more comparable to becoming a low-value (often free) worker, someone who pumps out rounds, not far from someone who sweeps the gym or works horse stables leading horse to pasture...in terms of social worth. When you come to a relatively "Thai" style gym as an adult novice aiming to perhaps become a fighter, you are doing this as a customer attempting to map onto a 10 year old Thai boy beginner who may very well become contractually owned by the gym, and socially obligated to its owner for life. These are very different, almost antithetical worlds. This is the fundamental tension between the beauties of Thai traditional Muay Thai culture, which carry very meaningful values, and its largely invisible, sometimes cruel and uncaring, social constriction. If you don't see the "ladder", and you only see "people", you aren't really seeing Thailand.        
    • He told me he was teaching at a gym in Chong Chom, Surin - which is right next to the Cambodian border.  Or has he decided to make use of the border crossing?  🤔
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

    • Hi, this might be out of the normal topic, but I thought you all might be interested in a book-- Children of the Neon Bamboo-- that has a really cool Martial Arts instructor character who set up an early Muy Thai gym south of Miami in the 1980s. He's a really cool character who drives the plot, and there historically accurate allusions to 1980s martial arts culture. However, the main thrust is more about nostalgia and friendships.    Can we do links? Childrenoftheneonbamboo.com Children of the Neon Bamboo: B. Glynn Kimmey: 9798988054115: Amazon.com: Movies & TV      
    • Davince Resolve is a great place to start. 
    • I see that this thread is from three years ago, and I hope your journey with Muay Thai and mental health has evolved positively during this time. It's fascinating to revisit these discussions and reflect on how our understanding of such topics can grow. The connection between training and mental health is intricate, as you've pointed out. Finding the right balance between pushing yourself and self-care is a continuous learning process. If you've been exploring various avenues for managing mood-related issues over these years, you might want to revisit the topic of mental health resources. One such resource is The UK Medical Cannabis Card, which can provide insights into alternative treatments.
    • Phetjeeja fought Anissa Meksen for a ONE FC interim atomweight kickboxing title 12/22/2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu92S6-V5y0&ab_channel=ONEChampionship Fight starts at 45:08 Phetjeeja won on points. Not being able to clinch really handicapped her. I was afraid the ref was going to start deducting points for clinch fouls.   
    • Earlier this year I wrote a couple of sociology essays that dealt directly with Muay Thai, drawing on Sylvie's journalism and discussions on the podcast to do so. I thought I'd put them up here in case they were of any interest, rather than locking them away with the intention to perfectly rewrite them 'some day'. There's not really many novel insights of my own, rather it's more just pulling together existing literature with some of the von Duuglus-Ittu's work, which I think is criminally underutilised in academic discussions of MT. The first, 'Some meanings of muay' was written for an ideology/sosciology of knowledge paper, and is an overly long, somewhat grindy attempt to give a combined historical, institutional, and situated study of major cultural meanings of Muay Thai as a form of strength. The second paper, 'the fighter's heart' was written for a qualitative analysis course, and makes extensive use of interviews and podcast discussions to talk about some ways in which the gendered/sexed body is described/deployed within Muay Thai. There's plenty of issues with both, and they're not what I'd write today, and I'm learning to realise that's fine! some meanings of muay.docx The fighter's heart.docx
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.3k
    • Total Posts
      11k
×
×
  • Create New...