Jump to content

Weight Distribution (and punching)


Recommended Posts

Hey guys, brand new to the forums and fairly new to Muay Thai. Just have a question regarding weight distribution and weight shifting with punches.

 

I'm being trained to basically keep my weight 50/50 between each leg. A habit I seem to have with my right cross is to shift my weight forward onto my front leg as I throw it. In the past (previous trainers, different martial arts) I've been told to do that simply to get more weight/momentum/power behind the punch, but I can definitely see that it has some negatives (like making your lead leg heavy and easy to kick).

 

I read and see conflicting advice though. So guys and girls, what have you been taught? Do you try to keep the weight even when you throw punches, do you lean and shift your weight around with strikes? I'm curious to hear about it!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've only ever been instructed to transfer weight during a right cross, although some teachers seem to emphasize the hip rotation more than actually getting more weight on that front leg. Jack Dempsey steps forward and almost "stumbles" with how much he drives into that front leg, but it's quick so unless someone were kicking your leg at that exact moment your weight is back off of it pretty fast... and Dempsey didn't do Muay Thai, so leg kicks weren't an issue. Karuhat and Namkabuan (my favorite danger duo) both have a really fast, loose (relaxed) right cross that is almost like you're being pulled by the right fist. You carry all your weight forward at once, like a lunge or like in fencing, rather than stepping. Oh... their punches are amazing. And then I've been taught by Neung and Chatchai, both of whom had boxing careers, that the right cross comes out long, with a big step and weight transfer forward and the head moving off-center as well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for the reply and information Sylvie! 

I guess the next question I'd ask is how much of your weight are you shifting to your front foot? My habit is putting nearly all of my weight over my front foot and really leaning forward and into the punch, which seemed to make me off balance. If I missed my opponent, I'd probably fall forward. I also don't think I'd get as much rotation / torque from my body and hips that way, but I might be wrong.

I think the other thing is that I'm doing this stationary and on a bag. Maybe things would change if I had to throw moving forward in the mix with sparring and whatnot? As I said, I've really only just started training MT at this place. Probably overthinking it, which I tend to do. Thank you anyway!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being stationary in front of a bag is something that just takes time and experience to get around. Obviously making concerted efforts will make changes occur more consistently than just letting time move you along, but don't rush it.

The "how much weight" question falls into the same trap of "everybody is different." As a rule I'd say you should not be able to pull your back foot off the ground with how much weight you have on the front one, but probably there are schools of thought that disagree with that. My advice is to watch fighters you either already identify with stylistically or who you want to be like stylistically, make an estimate on how much of their weight is moving and try to imitate it in the mirror to figure it out. My own personal advice is the forsake all other aspects in the interest of balance. Power and speed don't mean anything if you're off-balance, so the correct distribution of weight is the one that delivers the most power and speed without affecting balance.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • Speculatively, it seems likely that the real "warfare roots" of ring Muay Thai goes back to all the downtime during siege encampment, (and peacetime) Ayutthaya's across the river outer quarters. One of the earliest historical accounts of Siamese ring fighting is of the "Tiger King" disguising himself and participating in plebeian ring fighting. This is not "warfare fighting" and goes back several hundred years. One can imagine that such fighting would share some fighting principles with what occurred on the battlefield, but as it was unarmed and likely a gambling driven sport it - at least to me - likely seems like it has had its very own lineage of development. Less was the case that people were bringing battlefield lessons into the ring, and more that gambled on fighting skills developed ring-to-ring. In such cases of course, developing balance and defensive prowess would be important.  Incidentally, any such Ayutthaya ring-to-ring developments hold the historical potential for lots of cross-pollination from other fighting arts, as Ayutthaya maintained huge mercenary forces, not only from Malaysia and the cusp of islands, but even an entire Japanese quarter, not to mention a strong commercially minded Chinese presence. These may have been years of truly "mixing" fighting arts in the gambling rings of the city (it is unknown just how separatist each culture was in this melting pot, perhaps each kept to their own in ring fighting).
    • For anyone who follows my writings I do not argue for any sense of a "pure" Muay Thai, or even Siamese fighting art history. Quite different than such I take one of Siam and Thai strengths is just how integrative they have been over centuries of development (while, importantly, preserving its core identity). For instance Western Boxing has had a powerful influence upon the form and development of Muay Thai for well over 100 years, and helped make it perhaps the premiere ring fighting art in the world, but Western Boxing itself was a very deep, complexly developed art which mapped quite well upon traditional Muay Thai in many areas, allowing it to flourish. This is quite different than the de-skilling that is happening in the sport right now, where instead the sport is being turned towards a less-skilled development, for really commercial reasons.  The story of whether the influx of attention, branding, not to mention the very important monetary investment that Entertainment Muay Thai has brought will actually help "save" traditional Muay Thai is yet to be written. It very well might, as the sport was reaching some important demographic and cultural dead-ends, and it needed an infusion. But, let's not have it be lost, what itself is being lost, which is the actual very high level of skill Thailand had produced...and how it had developed it. Let's keep our eye on the de-skilling.
    • One of the more slippery aspects of this change is that in its more extreme versions Entertainment Muay Thai was a redesign to actually produce Western (and other non-Thai) winners. It involved de-skilling the Thai sport simply because Thais were just too good at the more complex things. Yes, it was meant to appeal to International eyes, both in the crowd (tourist shows) and on streams, but the satisfying international element was actually Western (often White) winners of fights, and ultimately championship belts. The de-skilling of the sport and art was about tipping the playing field hard (involving also weigh-in changes that would favor larger bodied international fighters). Thais had to learn - and still have to learn - how to fight like the less skilled Westerners (and others). In some sense its a crazy, upside-down presentation of foreign "superiority", yes driven by hyper Capitalism and digital entertainment, but also one which harkens back to Colonialism where the Western power teaches the "native" "how its really done", and is assumed to just be superior in Nature. The point of fact is that Thais have been arguably the best combat sport fighters in the world over the last 50 years, and it is not without irony that the form of their skill degradation is sometimes framed as a return to Siam/Thai warfare roots. It's not. Its a simplification of ring fighting for the purpose of international appeal. 
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.4k
    • Total Posts
      11.6k
×
×
  • Create New...