Jump to content

Technique Evolving Over Time - Good and Bad


Recommended Posts

I was thinking tonight during my run about how my technique has evolved the longer I've trained (and the more ring experience I've gained). While I think we all strive to "perfect" our technique as we go on, the changes in how we perform aren't always improvements.

 

A specific example of mine is my rear roundhouse. Starting out it was absolutely my strongest weapon. Then I broke my foot on the job and I had to adjust training for a while as it healed. Once I did start using it again full force, it wasn't the same as before. It was weaker. It was slower. It wasn't great. It's taken almost 8 months of focus to feel like it's back to a good place.

 

Am I the only one? I thought this might be fun to discuss.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know for me the kick changed because my step out changed - because of the injury and the habits I formed to compensate for it that stuck long after bones healed. You do as you practice, and for a while I wasn't practicing good kicks.

 

I know I've also learned to fight in closer and with more elbows, so in some ways the kick has been downgraded because I now have other weapons that I am pretty strong with. Overall I'm probably more balanced than before when I was crushing with just the one kick. It was really interesting to think about how different parts of my game have progressed each month, each year.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, I'm scared of re-injury, so I don't go as hard. Especially when drilling. That's what got me into this mess in the first place. The one thing I am grateful for is that my lower body is substantially stronger. But I'm still struggling with distance judgement and stepping out enough. Or even stepping forward. Like when we're doing light sparring, I'm afraid to use my left side at all, so I keep switching to southpaw to feel and then orthodox to go after someone. It's really bizarre.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know for me the kick changed because my step out changed - because of the injury and the habits I formed to compensate for it that stuck long after bones healed. You do as you practice, and for a while I wasn't practicing good kicks.

 

I know I've also learned to fight in closer and with more elbows, so in some ways the kick has been downgraded because I now have other weapons that I am pretty strong with. Overall I'm probably more balanced than before when I was crushing with just the one kick. It was really interesting to think about how different parts of my game have progressed each month, each year.

I feel like everything I've ever gotten "good" at has been at the minor expense of something else. I never actually "solve" anything, I just rearrange the same plates on the table over and over again, if that makes sense. So, when I broke my hand my jab got much better. When my kick got more balanced I kind of stopped punching. When my guard got better my kicks weren't as long. But all that changes. It comes and goes and everything gets better over time, but nothing is ever top-notch at the same time as anything else. So I just reshift my focus and work on the next thing to balance it out. 

I remember Arnold Schwarzenegger saying in "Pumping Iron" that he couldn't make his chest bigger without then having to make everything else a few centimeters bigger because he's already perfectly proportionate. It's that kind of balancing act, but without believing you're already perfect. It's just making these incremental changes.

But I guess all that is to say, don't give up on your kick. It went through a difficult time with the broken foot and other stuff got focus, but it'll come back around. I feel like all my progress that has really mattered in the long run has been in this neutral gear, like my balance or timing. Just a general awareness rather than a particular strike or limb or whatever. My teeps are doing really well for me right now, but I don't think it's the teep itself; I think it's the timing and comfort with throwing it. And that's from throwing thousands of shitty teeps in training, even when I wasn't thinking "man, my teeps are great." It's like it happened to me, rather than me doing anything for it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That makes sense Sylvie. Now that you say that, I can relate to that general awareness becoming better. Before I had zero body awareness, but slowly I'm becoming more aware of where I'm at, though nothing in particular has gotten better over anything else. Maybe that's why Coach has been giving me compliments where I felt he was full of it. I still feel super weak though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sylvie, I really like the image of rearranging plates. They're all still there, but the focus and order changes.

 

I'm still pushing forward. I think I had to accept that it's all evolving and not stress about "losing" something as I sharpen a different tool. I tend to obsess on things in a bad way, so it's a work-in-progress.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • Speculatively, it seems likely that the real "warfare roots" of ring Muay Thai goes back to all the downtime during siege encampment, (and peacetime) Ayutthaya's across the river outer quarters. One of the earliest historical accounts of Siamese ring fighting is of the "Tiger King" disguising himself and participating in plebeian ring fighting. This is not "warfare fighting" and goes back several hundred years. One can imagine that such fighting would share some fighting principles with what occurred on the battlefield, but as it was unarmed and likely a gambling driven sport it - at least to me - likely seems like it has had its very own lineage of development. Less was the case that people were bringing battlefield lessons into the ring, and more that gambled on fighting skills developed ring-to-ring. In such cases of course, developing balance and defensive prowess would be important.  Incidentally, any such Ayutthaya ring-to-ring developments hold the historical potential for lots of cross-pollination from other fighting arts, as Ayutthaya maintained huge mercenary forces, not only from Malaysia and the cusp of islands, but even an entire Japanese quarter, not to mention a strong commercially minded Chinese presence. These may have been years of truly "mixing" fighting arts in the gambling rings of the city (it is unknown just how separatist each culture was in this melting pot, perhaps each kept to their own in ring fighting).
    • For anyone who follows my writings I do not argue for any sense of a "pure" Muay Thai, or even Siamese fighting art history. Quite different than such I take one of Siam and Thai strengths is just how integrative they have been over centuries of development (while, importantly, preserving its core identity). For instance Western Boxing has had a powerful influence upon the form and development of Muay Thai for well over 100 years, and helped make it perhaps the premiere ring fighting art in the world, but Western Boxing itself was a very deep, complexly developed art which mapped quite well upon traditional Muay Thai in many areas, allowing it to flourish. This is quite different than the de-skilling that is happening in the sport right now, where instead the sport is being turned towards a less-skilled development, for really commercial reasons.  The story of whether the influx of attention, branding, not to mention the very important monetary investment that Entertainment Muay Thai has brought will actually help "save" traditional Muay Thai is yet to be written. It very well might, as the sport was reaching some important demographic and cultural dead-ends, and it needed an infusion. But, let's not have it be lost, what itself is being lost, which is the actual very high level of skill Thailand had produced...and how it had developed it. Let's keep our eye on the de-skilling.
    • One of the more slippery aspects of this change is that in its more extreme versions Entertainment Muay Thai was a redesign to actually produce Western (and other non-Thai) winners. It involved de-skilling the Thai sport simply because Thais were just too good at the more complex things. Yes, it was meant to appeal to International eyes, both in the crowd (tourist shows) and on streams, but the satisfying international element was actually Western (often White) winners of fights, and ultimately championship belts. The de-skilling of the sport and art was about tipping the playing field hard (involving also weigh-in changes that would favor larger bodied international fighters). Thais had to learn - and still have to learn - how to fight like the less skilled Westerners (and others). In some sense its a crazy, upside-down presentation of foreign "superiority", yes driven by hyper Capitalism and digital entertainment, but also one which harkens back to Colonialism where the Western power teaches the "native" "how its really done", and is assumed to just be superior in Nature. The point of fact is that Thais have been arguably the best combat sport fighters in the world over the last 50 years, and it is not without irony that the form of their skill degradation is sometimes framed as a return to Siam/Thai warfare roots. It's not. Its a simplification of ring fighting for the purpose of international appeal. 
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.4k
    • Total Posts
      11.6k
×
×
  • Create New...