Jump to content

Muay Thai style vs Kickboxing style


Recommended Posts

Hey guys, I am Dionas from Greece and this is my first post here. I have an upcoming fight under muay thai rules in 2 months. My opponent only recently have started training muay thai, but he has a good kickboxing background. My question is if you have any recommendations about fighting against a kickboxing style opponent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless Dionas is fighting A-Class, he won't be allowed to elbow, but clinching isn't a bad idea if you're strong there. Teeping on the outside will be useful too, because if he's the type of kickboxer I think he would likely be, he'd be more accustom to front kicks which are designed more to cause pain than they are to off balance or maintain distance.

You will want to be either all the way in, or all the way out - as (while I'm speaking in stereotypes) if he is an experienced kickboxer there is a good chance he will actually be faster than you in combination. When you clinch up you will want to specifically tangle his arm with your arm, go outside, place your fist into his chest and get tricep control with the other arm. 

If he's new to muay thai but he's a kickboxer (I'm assuming K-1 style because you've mentioned that you're from Greece, I know that's a stereotype but that's the more popular style out there) - then I would expect him to rip out of the clinch with punching combos and that will be very dangerous for you if you don't tie his arms up fully. Don't think that because he's a kickboxer he won't be able to bust out of your clinch, because they do it all the time. If you just grab hold of him, he'll break out, if you tangle up his arms you'll give him more trouble. Sylvie has a good seminar on how to do it, if it's something you don't feel confident with.

Have fun!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you both for your answers. I am not fighting A-class, but we are allowed to elbow. In fact my plan for this fight contains a lot of elbowing and clinching, but I am assuming that my opponent will be ready for something like that since he also knows my background. I am also trying to find ways to take advantage of his 'hop around' kickboxing style (I dont know if I am saying this right)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dionas said:

Thank you both for your answers. I am not fighting A-class, but we are allowed to elbow. In fact my plan for this fight contains a lot of elbowing and clinching, but I am assuming that my opponent will be ready for something like that since he also knows my background. I am also trying to find ways to take advantage of his 'hop around' kickboxing style (I dont know if I am saying this right)

That's great news. Rare opportunity to elbow!  Will you have elbow pads?

If you want to slow him down if he is a bouncer, I'd recommend going for low kicks. I'd try to use the clinch best you can, just make sure you're controlling his arms. Don't make the mistake of thinking Muay Thai > Kickboxing, because you may find that he's more confident striking, because it was all he was doing for a while. So IMO control his arms in the clinch, go for knees and elbows. 

Wishing you the best!

  • Nak Muay 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AndyMaBobs said:

That's great news. Rare opportunity to elbow!  Will you have elbow pads?

If you want to slow him down if he is a bouncer, I'd recommend going for low kicks. I'd try to use the clinch best you can, just make sure you're controlling his arms. Don't make the mistake of thinking Muay Thai > Kickboxing, because you may find that he's more confident striking, because it was all he was doing for a while. So IMO control his arms in the clinch, go for knees and elbows. 

Wishing you the best!

Yeah we will be wearing protective gear including elbow pads. Thanks for your advice mate and wish you the best too! 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

How do the two differ? I do Thai but last night did kickboxing class since I was too late to make it to Thai.

Seemed more punch orientated and we did no clinch work but this may have just been the structure of that individual class.

Enjoyed it, and will go back, will it help improve my Thai also?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, alexeric said:

How do the two differ? I do Thai but last night did kickboxing class since I was too late to make it to Thai.

Seemed more punch orientated and we did no clinch work but this may have just been the structure of that individual class.

Enjoyed it, and will go back, will it help improve my Thai also?

If you're doing it at the same place, with the same coaches there probably won't be tons of difference in how you learn to punch and kick. Depending on where you go the rhythm is quite different. Kickboxing is fought with a lot more urgency because the fights are two rounds shorter + scoring favours aggression. It'll help your Muay Thai for sure.

As for how they're different? It really depends on what sort of kickboxing you're learning. If you're learning what typically gets called 'K1 rules' nowadays, you're learning the same tools from Muay Thai, but without elbows and clinch work is much more limited (K1 used to allow for more clinching but Buakaw and Overeem were too dominant with it). Teeps are a rarity, Giorgio Petrosyan is the most dominant combat sport athlete of all time, and a large part of his success comes from shoves and teeps + that guy has beaten quite literally every top name except for Masato and a draw against Buakaw. 

You should learn some clinch work, because in kickboxing you need to know how to punch and clutch, because the pace is so fast. I'd say it was probably just that particular class.  If your focus is Muay Thai, I'd suggest to train kickboxing every so often but I wouldn't focus  on it. If you'd rather kickboxing competition you can really stay and train in either, just so long as you're okay with losing weapons if you're training Muay Thai and competing in kickboxing, but you certainly won't be lost so long as you're sparring regularly with people who have a kickboxing style.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Recent Topics

  • Latest Comments

    • Speculatively, it seems likely that the real "warfare roots" of ring Muay Thai goes back to all the downtime during siege encampment, (and peacetime) Ayutthaya's across the river outer quarters. One of the earliest historical accounts of Siamese ring fighting is of the "Tiger King" disguising himself and participating in plebeian ring fighting. This is not "warfare fighting" and goes back several hundred years. One can imagine that such fighting would share some fighting principles with what occurred on the battlefield, but as it was unarmed and likely a gambling driven sport it - at least to me - likely seems like it has had its very own lineage of development. Less was the case that people were bringing battlefield lessons into the ring, and more that gambled on fighting skills developed ring-to-ring. In such cases of course, developing balance and defensive prowess would be important.  Incidentally, any such Ayutthaya ring-to-ring developments hold the historical potential for lots of cross-pollination from other fighting arts, as Ayutthaya maintained huge mercenary forces, not only from Malaysia and the cusp of islands, but even an entire Japanese quarter, not to mention a strong commercially minded Chinese presence. These may have been years of truly "mixing" fighting arts in the gambling rings of the city (it is unknown just how separatist each culture was in this melting pot, perhaps each kept to their own in ring fighting).
    • For anyone who follows my writings I do not argue for any sense of a "pure" Muay Thai, or even Siamese fighting art history. Quite different than such I take one of Siam and Thai strengths is just how integrative they have been over centuries of development (while, importantly, preserving its core identity). For instance Western Boxing has had a powerful influence upon the form and development of Muay Thai for well over 100 years, and helped make it perhaps the premiere ring fighting art in the world, but Western Boxing itself was a very deep, complexly developed art which mapped quite well upon traditional Muay Thai in many areas, allowing it to flourish. This is quite different than the de-skilling that is happening in the sport right now, where instead the sport is being turned towards a less-skilled development, for really commercial reasons.  The story of whether the influx of attention, branding, not to mention the very important monetary investment that Entertainment Muay Thai has brought will actually help "save" traditional Muay Thai is yet to be written. It very well might, as the sport was reaching some important demographic and cultural dead-ends, and it needed an infusion. But, let's not have it be lost, what itself is being lost, which is the actual very high level of skill Thailand had produced...and how it had developed it. Let's keep our eye on the de-skilling.
    • One of the more slippery aspects of this change is that in its more extreme versions Entertainment Muay Thai was a redesign to actually produce Western (and other non-Thai) winners. It involved de-skilling the Thai sport simply because Thais were just too good at the more complex things. Yes, it was meant to appeal to International eyes, both in the crowd (tourist shows) and on streams, but the satisfying international element was actually Western (often White) winners of fights, and ultimately championship belts. The de-skilling of the sport and art was about tipping the playing field hard (involving also weigh-in changes that would favor larger bodied international fighters). Thais had to learn - and still have to learn - how to fight like the less skilled Westerners (and others). In some sense its a crazy, upside-down presentation of foreign "superiority", yes driven by hyper Capitalism and digital entertainment, but also one which harkens back to Colonialism where the Western power teaches the "native" "how its really done", and is assumed to just be superior in Nature. The point of fact is that Thais have been arguably the best combat sport fighters in the world over the last 50 years, and it is not without irony that the form of their skill degradation is sometimes framed as a return to Siam/Thai warfare roots. It's not. Its a simplification of ring fighting for the purpose of international appeal. 
  • The Latest From Open Topics Forum

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      1.4k
    • Total Posts
      11.6k
×
×
  • Create New...